HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/17/95COUNCIL WORK SESSION
January 17, 1995
3:30 p.m.
Large Conference Room
Members present: Mayor Rooff, Anders, Jordan, Murphy, Getty,
Mollenhoff.
Members absent: Krizek, Collier.
Moved by Murphy, seconded by Mollenhoff that the Agenda, as
proposed, be approved. Ayes: Five. Absent: Krizek, Collier.
Motion carried.
Bob Stevenson, Administrative Director, reviewed the proposed list
of fund transfers to various Capital Improvement projects with the
council. The funds are being transferred to close out project
accounts after completion of the project and to assist in the
consolidation of funds where appropriate as requested by the City's
auditor. A complete listing of the fund transfers will be
available in the City Clerk's office for review by the public.
Don Temeyer, City Planner, identified the funding arrangements for
the expansion of the Park Avenue Ramp. Funds are available from an
EPA grant, special assessment fund and available taxes from the
Downtown Tax Increment Financing district. Downtown property
owners have agreed to assess additional taxes for the ramp
expansion through the special assessment fund. TIF funds will
become available after FY 1996 when the Conway Civic Center Ramp
debt is paid off. The $2,700,000 bond program combined with these
other funds will complete the project as estimated.
The importance of meeting parking needs to attract new businesses
to the downtown area was discussed. Discussion was also heard on
the potential to increase parking availability if a shuttle service
with MET is developed.
With no further discussion, it was moved by Murphy, seconded by
Getty that the meeting be adjourned at 4:06 p.m. Ayes: Five.
Absent: Krizek, Collier. Motion carried.
Susan Fangman
City Clerk
COUNCIL WORK SESSION
January 17, 1995
4:15 p.m.
Large Conference Room
Members present: Anders, Jordan, Murphy, Getty, Mollenhoff,
Krizek.
Members absent: Collier.
Moved by Getty, seconded by Jordan that the Agenda, as proposed, be
approved. Ayes: Five. Absent: Krizek, Collier. Motion carried.
Street Superintendent Dick Grimm presented two options for
continuing operations in the Sanitation Department. Currently the
department is understaffed and Manpower workers are being utilized
to fill the gap. Four additional refuse collectors would need to
be hired to return the department to a full service level.
As a second option, Dick Grimm provided a demonstration tape of a
proposed automated refuse collection system. The system includes
the purchase of a one-man refuse collection truck and one roll-out
container to be provided to each garbage customer for use on the
automated routes. A cost comparison between the current refuse
collection systems and the proposed automated system was presented
and discussed. It is estimated that staffing requirements and
their associated costs would be decreased with the use of the one-
man automated trucks. Additional savings could be realized in a
reduction of workers compensation costs, lost time due to work
related injuries and a decrease in required supervision.
The City of Cedar Falls is currently operating two routes using the
proposed system and it is working well. Cedar Falls has staggered
its collection fees based on the size of container utilized by the
residence. The fees are as follows: 32 gallon container rate is
$8.00 per month, 68 gallon container rate is $13.00 per month and
the 95 gallon container fee is $19.00 per month. Approximately
forty-five percent of the residents are using a 32 gallon
container. Additional bags may be placed on top of the container
for pickup if a sticker is purchased for a cost of $1.25 per
sticker.
The City of Waterloo would need to set up a volume based fee system
to accommodate the changes in refuse collection associated with an
automated system. It is being recommended that the City start with
two automated routes and maintain the remaining routes with two man
crews.
Councilperson Krizek is in attendance at 4:55 p.m.
Councilperson Jordan raised concerns with the costs as represented
and the perception of using a volume based fee if the fees are not
being reduced. It was felt that taxpayers would be unwilling to
implement the system if the fees for the automated routes are
established at a different level than the current garbage fee rate
structure. It was suggested that a transfer station could be an
option to cut the costs associated with service delivery. A
transfer station would allow increased productivity as more
residences could be serviced in one day.
Councilperson Getty encouraged the Council to review the Cedar
Falls automated routes as the City needs to make changes to the
current collection system and this is the right time to make those
adjustments. Councilperson Anders agreed that the decision to make
a change needs to be done quickly so that if it is determined that
no operational changes are needed four new employees could be hired
or the change to automation could be started with the purchase of
two new trucks as identified in the Capital Equipment program.
Council Work Session
January 17, 1995
Page 2
Councilperson Mollenhoff requested that the Finance Manager, Bruce
Meisinger, review the material provided and work with the Street
Superintendent to provide feedback on the cost analysis done by Mr.
Grimm. Councilperson Getty included a request for an analysis of
five fully automated routes being established with comparisons of
costs and revenues included in the proposal.
Moved by Mollenhoff, seconded by Krizek to direct Street
Superintendent Dick Grimm and Finance Manager Bruce Meisinger to
work together to prepare a GAAP cost analysis for the proposal and
staff is directed to seek bids for both types of refuse trucks.
Ayes: Six. Absent: Collier. Motion carried.
With no further business before the council, it was moved by
Mollenhoff, seconded by Krizek that the meeting be adjourned at
5:06 p.m. Ayes: Six. Absent: Collier. Motion carried.
Susan Fangman
City Clerk