HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/19/1986CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
May 19, 1986
5:15 p.m.
Council Chambers
Members present: Budak, Seeber, Lichty, Wright, Angel, Dowie, Miller
and Mayor McKinley.
Mayor McKinley stated that the reason for the meeting was to discuss
•the new format of the City Council Agenda. He referred to the Agenda
of May 19, 1986 which reflected a public information section on page
three. He reported that such items will no longer appear on the
"action" portion of the Agenda. These items will be merely for
Council information. Items that will appear under the information
section will include such items as bill payments, payout to City
employees who resign or retire, certification lists from the Civil
Service Commission, appointments or promotions made by the Police or
Fire Chiefs, minutes of various boards and commissions, and cleaning
and clothing allowances paid to Police and Fire Personnel. He
emphasized that the Council Agenda will now only reflect those items
that the Council has power to approve or deny.
In response to a question from Councilperson Wright, Michelle Temeyer
stated that she would check to verify that Community Development
Board Minutes do not need approval of the Council.
Councilperson Miller asked that whenever a license or permit is
presented to the Council for approval, that the Council be notified
in advance if there is a problem with the applicant meeting the
requirements of the ordinance.
There was discussion about the first item under "Resolutions to be
adopted" of the Council Agenda of May 19, 1986. This item was the
resolution approving the FY87 Salary Proposal for non -bargaining
employees. Several Council members indicated that they did not
realize that this item would be discussed by the full Council prior
to a City Council Work Session on this matter. It was indicated by
Mayor McKinley that the Reorganization Committee had reviewed the
proposed salary schedule and all three members unanimously approved
its contents. Councilperson Budak indicated that he had voted
affirmatively at the Reorganization Committee Meeting as he thought
it was a motion to refer this item to a Council Work Session.
The consensus of the Council was that the new format as explained
above be approved.
With no further business before the Committee, the meeting was
adjourned.
Michelle Temeyer
Deputy Clerk/Auditor