HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/20/92CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
February 20, 1992
4:00 p.m.
Large Conference Room
Roll call: Mayor Manning, Angel, Dell, Buck, Brown and Wright.
Larry P. Burger, Clerk/Auditor, provided general fund expenditure
levels for the FY 1993 budget. The amount of tax levy to sustain
each operation was delineated. The chart indicated that the
problem does not lie in the city's general fund tax levy since with
increased valuations, all expenditures necessary for operation of
the general fund can be levied within the $8.10 levy. This levy
($19.84) includes current year expenditures plus negotiated salary
increases. The increase in the tax levy primarily comes from the
increased cost to the city for the police and fire pension levy and
debt service. The total of all other levies including the general
fund levy, is $19.84. In order to arrive at last year's tax levy
of $18.63 per $1000 of valuation, approximately $1.5 million must
be cut from the levy. Since most other levies outside the general
fund are fixed, i.e. employee benefits, debt service levy,
unemployment levy, police and fire pension levy, etc. most of the
cuts will need to come from the general fund operation.
Mr. Burger explained that in order to decrease the rate from $19.64
to $18.63, each department was asked to reduce its budget by 6.5%.
Even this lower rate would mean a slight increase in taxes of $40
per home with an assessed valuation of $50,000.
Councilperson Brown stated that during the last municipal election,
the voters had sent a clear message by stating they did not want
their property taxes raised. Councilperson Angel stated that the
6.5% reduction in department's budget was definitely cutting into
the "bone". Councilperson Buck stated that the Council has one of
two choices: either across the board cuts or eliminate some major
programs. Councilperson Brown supported the view of an across the
board cut. Councilperson Wright stated that it was important to
prioritize programs rather than across the board cuts.
Councilperson Buck proposed several major projects for elimination
or down -sizing. The first was the elimination of animal control.
City staff commented that if it were eliminated, some agency must
be responsible for handling bite cases. The current animal control
budget is $160,000. Buck also suggested the elimination of non -
conflict street lighting at an approximate cost savings of $85,000.
Councilperson Dell favored an across the board cut. Councilperson
Brown stated that the City cannot continue to fund large salary
increases because the money is simply not there. Councilperson
Angel stated that the City is bound by State Law in its collective
bargaining process. Jim Rodemeyer, Personnel Director, stated that
the council will be asked to consider a resolution that would
address the current Police Protective Association collective
bargaining process. In essence, the resolution states that if the
arbitrator awards any higher increase than the City's final offer,
the cost would come directly out of the Police Department's budget.
Councilperson Brown also stated that employees should share in
health care costs. Councilperson Buck supported the idea of
looking at specific program cuts since across the board cuts would
cause undue harm to those departments that have been asked to cut
back to fund previous major public safety expenditures.
Councilperson Brown reiterated his position that funding of human
service agencies should be cut from the city budget. Councilperson
Wright disagreed with this philosophy. Councilperson Dell stated
that these outside agencies do a valuable service to the city and
that we must look at their results and potential cost to the city
if funds are not allocated to these human service agencies.
Continuing with Mr. Buck's proposal cuts, he suggested that the
recent mayor and city council increases be rolled back to December,
1991, levels. He also suggested that the travel line item within
the city council budget be eliminated ($3100). Buck also suggested
City Council Work Session
February 20, 1992
Page 2
the closing of a fire station. Stations that would be considered
for closing include Nos. 5 and 6.
Mayor Manning stated that even after several of these larger
programs were eliminated, each department would then still be
requested to make a small decrease. He stated that if the Council
imposed an across the board decrease, the council is no longer
setting policy as it should be.
Councilperson Buck also suggested the possible closing of South
Hills Golf Course. Councilperson Dell stated that the City could
consider one pro for all three courses. Rick Tagtow, Director of
Parks and Forestry, stated that he would rather see a restructuring
of the pro shop activities whereby the City would realize revenue
from these individual, private enterprises. He stated that it is
important for the City to capitalize on our golf courses which is
considered to be an asset. Discussion was heard on whether the
Park Board or City Council is responsible for changing the pro
contracts. The City Attorney may want to investigate.
John Meyer, Public Works Director, stated that approximately one
year and a half ago, proposals for privatization of garbage
collection was solicited. At that time, the City could provide the
service at a lesser cost.
Larry P. Burger, Clerk/Auditor, stated that the FY 1993 budget
anticipates a cash carry over of approximately $1 million which
does not include the assets of the Waterloo Housing Authority. He
stated that he is considering asking the Council to adopt an
ordinance setting a minimum cash balance. He indicated that it is
standard practice for a city our size to have an approximate cash
carry over balance of $5 million. This cash reserve is important
to the city's bond rating and is a continual struggle to keep at
acceptable levels.
Councilperson Brown stated that the duties of the Civil Defense
Department could be transferred to the Fire Department and that it
is not a legal obligation of the City to maintain the Civil Defense
Department. Brown also suggested that the Convention and Visitors
Bureau be housed at the 5 Sullivan Brothers Convention Center.
This would reduce the City's subsidy to the Housing Authority which
basically is its occupancy cost at its current location (Chamber of
Commerce). Councilperson Brown also suggested that the Waterloo
Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Program be transferred to the
Community Development Department.
Councilperson Dell suggested that more engineering services be
conducted in-house eliminating the need for consultant services.
It was stated that currently city staff are doing all engineering
services related to the local option sales tax reconstruction
projects, the annual sidewalk repair program, small storm sewer
projects, and others. Currently, the engineering budget is
comprised of 94% personnel costs. If the city were to consider
doing all of its own engineering, a cadre of staff would be
required and most probably not be used on a year-round basis due to
their specialties. It was stated that the city can use outside
engineering services at a much cheaper rate.
Again, Mr. Buck stated that the city could cut major program areas
or impose a 6.5% across the board decrease. Councilperson Wright
stated that there were too many unanswered questions for a decision
at this time.
Unemployment costs are doubling which reflects the laying off of
the seasonal employees in the Park Department for 6 months of the
year. Larry P. Burger, Clerk/Auditor, stated that the city's
contribution to the police and fire pension has increased
dramatically with the transfer of funds to the State of Iowa. The
State is mandating that cities levy 17% of total salary costs which
City Council Work Session
February 20, 1992
Page 3
translates into a $600,000 increase from last year's levy. He
noted that the State imposed mandate has been very costly to the
city since the city's pension fund would most probably have been
self-funded within five years if the city had retained control of
the fund. Some discussion was heard on whether the city could
appeal or sue the State for this cost increase.
It was noted that the citizens report had recommended that the city
pick up the additional cost equal to MET's decrease in federal
funding. Although the exact amount of federal cuts have not yet
been determined, it is anticipated that an additional 10 cent levy
would be required to maintain current service levels.
Mr. Burger stated that as the budget currently stands, the city
would publish at the $19.84 levy rate unless the council directed
otherwise. It was the consensus of the council that the city
should publish at the $18.63 level. Any increases to the budget
after publication would require a new public hearing.
Chief Koehrsen stated that the 6.5% decrease in budget would mean
approximately $415,000 less to run the Waterloo Police Department
and that the affects would be devastating. Programs that would be
terminated include the following: two officers in the liaison
program at East and West High Schools, additional officers placed
into the tri county drug task force, four officers in the police
liaison program, and the number of ward cars on patrol in the city
would be cut by one-third, from 10 to 7. The following loss of
services would also occur: funeral escorts, closing the service
counter of the police department, no investigation into non -injury
automobile accidents, no response to simple misdemeanors unless
they are in progress or violence has occurred, no response to
reports of shoplifting, no investigation of minor larcenies to home
or businesses unless injury had occurred, and reduce of scope of
the narcotics enforcement unit. In total, the Department would be
twelve less personnel including police officers and civilians.
Kathy Oberle, 710 Forest Avenue, stated that the police and fire
department could cut costs drastically if the departments were
combined. She indicated that she had cut the city budget to a levy
of $18.35 per $1000 of valuation. Mr. Burger asked that she
provide the city with a copy of these cuts. She also stated that
the outside human service agencies should be funded as they serve
a definite need for various constituents. Her plan to combine
police and fire departments would begin with centralized dispatch
resulting in savings of two to four individuals. She also urged
cross training of various individuals. She also stated that non -
bargaining salary increases should be frozen and that a strong
statement should be sent to bargaining units concerning future
salary increases.
Dean Myhr, Director of Recreation, stated that his entire
department is non -bargaining personnel and that freezing their
salaries would be unfair.
No official action was taken on any of the above items. The next
meeting of the City Council to discuss the FY 1993 budget will be
held on Monday, February 24, 1992, in the Large Conference Room.
With no further business before the Council, the meeting was
adjourned at 5:35 p.m.
Larry P. Burger
City Clerk/Auditor