The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutI & S Group, Inc. - 9/4/2018 OWNER ¢ �- Document B101 TM - 2007 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect AGREEMENT made as of the Fourth day of September in the year Two Thousand Eighteen (In words, indicate day,month and year) ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: BETWEEN the Architect's client identified as the Owner: The author of this document has (Name, address and other information) added information needed for its completion.The author may also have revised the text of the original City of Waterloo AIA standard form.An Additions and 715 Mulberry Street Deletions Report that notes added Waterloo,IA 50703 information as well as revisions to Telephone Number:319-291-4311 the standard form text is available Fax Number:319-291-4286 from the author and should be reviewed.A vertical line in the left and the Architect: margin of this document indicates (Name, address and other information) where the author has added necessary information and where I&S Group,Inc.(ISG) the author has added to or deleted 314 East 4th Street from the original AIA text. Waterloo,IA 50703 This document has important legal Telephone Number:319-234-1515 consequences.Consultation with an Fax Number:319-234-1517 attorney is encouraged with respect for the following Project: to its completion or modification. (Name, location and detailed description) f Building Survey/Assessment for the City of Waterloo,Iowa. The Owner and Architect agree as follows. Inst. AIA Document 8101"—2007(formerly 8151 m—1997).Copyright®1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.WARNING:This AIA Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA®Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 16:32:36 on 08/29/2018 under Order No.1875935897 which expires on 0 711 31201 9,and is not for resale. User Notes: (389ADA3D) §2.2 The Architect shall perform its services consistent with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by architects practicing in the same or similar locality under the same or similar circumstances. The Architect shall perform its services as expeditiously as is consistent with such professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Project. §2.3 The Architect shall identify a representative authorized to act on behalf of the Architect with respect to the Project. §2.4 Except with the Owner's knowledge and consent,the Architect shall not engage in any activity,or accept any employment,interest or contribution that would reasonably appear to compromise the Architect's professional judgment with respect to this Project. §2.5 The Architect shall maintain the following insurance for the duration of this Agreement.If any of the requirements set forth below exceed the types and limits the Architect normally maintains,the Owner shall reimburse the Architect for any additional cost: (Idents types and limits of insurance coverage, and other insurance requirements applicable to the Agreement, if any.) 1 General Liability Each Occurrence $1,000,000.00 General Aggregate $2,000,000.00 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $1,000,000.00 Umbrella Each Occurrence/A e ate $2,000,000.00 .2 Automobile Liability Total Loss ---j-$1,000,000.00 .3 Workers' Compensation Bodily Injury by Accident $ 500,000.00 Workers' Com ensation Bodily Injury by Disease $ 500,000.00 Each Employee Workers' Compensation Bodily Injury $ 500,000.00 Policy Limit by Disease .4 Professional Liability per Claim $2,000,000.00 Professional Liability Annual Aggregate $2,000,000.00 EEEI ARTICLE 3 SCOPE OF ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES §3.1 The Architect's Basic Services consist of those described in Article 3 and include usual and customary structural,mechanical,and electrical engineering services. Services not set forth in Article 3 are Additional Services. §3.1.1 The Architect shall manage the Architect's services,consult with the Owner,research applicable design criteria,attend Project meetings,communicate with members of the Project team and report progress to the Owner. §3.1.2 The Architect shall coordinate its services with those services provided by the Owner and the Owner's consultants. The Architect shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of services and information Init. AIA Document B101 TM—2007(formerly B151 T —1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.WARNING:This AIA®Document is protected by U.S.copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 3 this AIA®Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) furnished by the Owner and the Owner's consultants.The Architect shall provide prompt written notice to the . Owner if the Architect becomes aware of any error,omission or inconsistency in such services or information. (Paragraph Deleted) §3.1.4 The Architect shall not be responsible for an Owner's directive or substitution made without the Architect's approval. §3.1.5 The Architect shall,at appropriate times,contact the governmental authorities required to approve the Construction Documents and the entities providing utility services to the Project. In designing the Project,the Architect shall respond to applicable design requirements imposed by such governmental authorities and by such entities providing utility services. §3.1.6 The Architect shall assist the Owner in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. §3.2 SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE SERVICES NIA §3.2.1 The Architect shall review the program and other information furnished by the Owner,and shall review laws, codes,and regulations applicable to the Architect's services. §3.2.2 The Architect shall prepare a preliminary evaluation of the Owner's program,schedule,budget for the Cost of the Work,Project site,and the proposed procurement or delivery method and other Initial Information,each in terms of the other,to ascertain the requirements of the Project. The Architect shall notify the Owner of(1)any inconsistencies discovered in the information,and(2)other information or consulting services that may be reasonably needed for the Project. §3.2.3 The Architect shall present its preliminary evaluation to the Owner and shall discuss with the Owner alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project,including the feasibility of incorporating environmentally responsible design approaches.The Architect shall reach an understanding with the Owner regarding the requirements of the Project. §3.2.4 Based on the Project's requirements agreed upon with the Owner,the Architect shall prepare and present for the Owner's approval a preliminary design illustrating the scale and relationship of the Project components. §3.2.5 Based on the Owner's approval of the preliminary design,the Architect shall prepare Schematic Design Documents for the Owner's approval.The Schematic Design Documents shall consist of drawings and other documents including a site plan,if appropriate,and preliminary building plans,sections and elevations; and may include some combination of study models,perspective sketches,or digital modeling.Preliminary selections of major building systems and construction materials shall be noted on the drawings or described in writing. §3.2.5.1 The Architect shall consider environmentally responsible design alternatives, such as material choices and building orientation,together with other considerations based on program and aesthetics,in developing a design that is consistent with the Owner's program,schedule and budget for the Cost of the Work.The Owner may obtain other environmentally responsible design services under Article 4. §3.2.5.2 The Architect shall consider the value of alternative materials,building systems and equipment,together with other considerations based on program and aesthetics in developing a design for the Project that is consistent with the Owner's program,schedule and budget for the Cost of the Work. §3.2.6 The Architect shall submit to the Owner an estimate of the Cost of the Work prepared in accordance with Section 6.3. §3.2.7 The Architect shall submit the Schematic Design Documents to the Owner,and request the Owner's approval. AIA Document B101 TM—2007(formerly 8151 TM—1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights Init. reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 4 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07113/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) §3.3 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE SERVICES NIA §3.3.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Schematic Design Documents,and on the Owner's authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work,the Architect shall prepare Design Development Documents for the Owner's approval. The Design Development Documents shall illustrate and describe the development of the approved Schematic Design Documents and shall consist of drawings and other documents including plans,sections,elevations,typical construction details,and diagrammatic layouts of building systems to fix and describe the size and character of the Project as to architectural,structural,mechanical and electrical systems,and such other elements as may be appropriate.The Design Development Documents shall also include outline specifications that identify major materials and systems and establish in general their quality levels. §3.3.2 The Architect shall update the estimate of the Cost of the Work. §3.3.3 The Architect shall submit the Design Development documents to the Owner,advise the Owner of any adjustments to the estimate of the Cost of the Work,and request the Owner's approval. §3.4 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE SERVICES NIA §3.4.1 Based on the Owner's approval of the Design Development Documents,and on the Owner's authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work,the Architect shall prepare Construction Documents for the Owner's approval. The Construction Documents shall illustrate and describe the further development of the approved Design Development Documents and shall consist of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the quality levels of materials and systems and other requirements for the construction of the Work.The Owner and Architect acknowledge that in order to construct the Work the Contractor will provide additional information, including Shop Drawings,Product Data, Samples and other similar submittals, which the Architect shall review in accordance with Section 3.6.4. §3.4.2 The Architect shall incorporate into the Construction Documents the design requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. §3.4.3 During the development of the Construction Documents,the Architect shall assist the Owner in the development and preparation of(1)bidding and procurement information that describes the time,place and conditions of bidding,including bidding or proposal forms;(2)the form of agreement between the Owner and Contractor;and(3)the Conditions of the Contract for Construction(General, Supplementary and other Conditions). The Architect shall also compile a project manual that includes the Conditions of the Contract for Construction and Specifications and may include bidding requirements and sample forms. §3.4.4 The Architect shall update the estimate for the Cost of the Work. §3.4.5 The Architect shall submit the Construction Documents to the Owner,advise the Owner of any adjustments to the estimate of the Cost of the Work,take any action required under Section 6.5,and request the Owner's approval. §3.5 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATION PHASE SERVICES NIA §3.5.1 GENERAL The Architect shall assist the Owner in establishing a list of prospective contractors.Following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents,the Architect shall assist the Owner in(1)obtaining either competitive bids or negotiated proposals; (2)confirming responsiveness of bids or proposals; (3)determining the successful bid or proposal,if any;and,(4)awarding and preparing contracts for construction. §3.5.2 COMPETITIVE BIDDING NIA §3.5.2.1 Bidding Documents shall consist of bidding requirements and proposed Contract Documents. §3.5.2.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner in bidding the Project by .1 procuring the reproduction of Bidding Documents for distribution to prospective bidders; .2 distributing the Bidding Documents to prospective bidders,requesting their return upon completion of the bidding process,and maintaining a log of distribution and retrieval and of the amounts of deposits,if any,received from and returned to prospective bidders; .3 organizing and conducting a pre-bid conference for prospective bidders;if necessary; Init. AIA Document B101 T"—2007(formerly B151 T —1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 5 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) .4 preparing responses to questions from prospective bidders and providing clarifications and interpretations of the Bidding Documents to all prospective bidders in the form of addenda;and .5 organizing and conducting the opening of the bids,and subsequently documenting and distributing the bidding results,as directed by the Owner. §3.5,2.3 The Architect shall consider requests for substitutions,if the Bidding Documents permit substitutions,and shall prepare and distribute addenda identifying approved substitutions to all prospective bidders. (Paragraphs Deleted) §3.6 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES NIA §3.6.1 GENERAL §3.6.1.1 The Architect shall provide administration of the Contract between the Owner and the Contractor as set forth below and in AIA Document A201 Tx--2007,General Conditions of the Contract for Construction.If the Owner and Contractor modify AIA Document A201-2007,those modifications shall not affect the Architect's services under this Agreement unless the Owner and the Architect amend this Agreement. §3.6.1.2 The Architect shall advise and consult with the Owner during the Construction Phase Services.The Architect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in this Agreement.The Architect shall not have control over,charge of,or responsibility for the construction means,methods,techniques, sequences or procedures,or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work,nor shall the Architect be responsible for the Contractor's failure to perform the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents.The Architect shall be responsible for the Architect's negligent acts or omissions,but shall not have control over or charge of,and shall not be responsible for,acts or omissions of the Contractor or of any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. §3.6.1.3 Subject to Section 4.3,the Architect's responsibility to provide Construction Phase Services commences with the award of the Contract for Construction and terminates on the date the Architect issues the final Certificate for Payment. §3.6.2 EVALUATIONS OF THE WORK §3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction,or as otherwise required in Section 4.3.3,to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed,and to determine,in general,if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work,when fully completed,will be in accordance with the Contract Documents.However,the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work.On the basis of the site visits,the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed,and report to the Owner(1)known deviations from the Contract Documents and from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor,and(2)defects and deficiencies observed in the Work. §3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents.Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable,the Architect shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents,whether or not such Work is fabricated,installed or completed.However,neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect to the Contractor, Subcontractors,material and equipment suppliers,their agents or employees or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. §3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under,and requirements of,the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor.The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. §3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings.When making such interpretations and decisions,the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by both Owner and Contractor,shall not AIA Document 6101 TM—2007(formerly 8151 TM—1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights Init. reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 6 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) show partiality to either,and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. The Architect's decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. §3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractor designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker,as that term is defined in AIA Document A201-2007,the Architect shall render initial decisions on Claims between the Owner and Contractor as provided in the Contract Documents. §3.6.3 CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR §3.6.3.1 The Architect shall review and certify the amounts due the Contractor and shall issue certificates in such amounts. The Architect's certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Owner,based on the Architect's evaluation of the Work as provided in Section 3.6.2 and on the data comprising the Contractor's Application for Payment,that,to the best of the Architect's knowledge,information and belief,the Work has progressed to the point indicated and that the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. The foregoing representations are subject(1)to an evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion,(2)to results of subsequent tests and inspections,(3)to correction of minor deviations from the Contract Documents prior to completion,and(4)to specific qualifications expressed by the Architect. §3.6.3.2 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has(1)made exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work,(2)reviewed construction means,methods,techniques,sequences or procedures,(3)reviewed copies of requisitions received from Subcontractors and material suppliers and other data requested by the Owner to substantiate the Contractor's right to payment,or(4)ascertained how or for what purpose the Contractor has used money previously paid on account of the Contract Sum. §3.6.3.3 The Architect shall maintain a record of the Applications and Certificates for Payment. §3.6.4 SUBMITTALS §3.6.4.1 The Architect shall review the Contractor's submittal schedule and shall not unreasonably delay or withhold approval.The Architect's action in reviewing submittals shall be taken in accordance with the approved submittal schedule or,in the absence of an approved submittal schedule,with reasonable promptness while allowing sufficient time in the Architect's professional judgment to permit adequate review. §3.6.4.2 In accordance with the Architect-approved submittal schedule,the Architect shall review and approve or take other appropriate action upon the Contractor's submittals such as Shop Drawings,Product Data and Samples, but only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents.Review of such submittals is not for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other information such as dimensions,quantities,and installation or performance of equipment or systems,which are the Contractor's responsibility.The Architect's review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or,unless otherwise specifically stated by the Architect,of any construction means,methods, techniques, sequences or procedures. The Architect's approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. §3.6.4.3 If the Contract Documents specifically require the Contractor to provide professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems,materials or equipment,the Architect shall specify the appropriate performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. The Architect shall review shop drawings and other submittals related to the Work designed or certified by the design professional retained by the Contractor that bear such professional's seal and signature when submitted to the Architect.The Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy,accuracy and completeness of the services,certifications and approvals performed or provided by such design professionals. §3.6.4.4 Subject to the provisions of Section 4.3,the Architect shall review and respond to requests for information about the Contract Documents.The Architect shall set forth in the Contract Documents the requirements for requests for information.Requests for information shall include,at a minimum,a detailed written statement that indicates the specific Drawings or Specifications in need of clarification and the nature of the clarification requested.The Architect's response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon,or otherwise with Init. AIA Document 8101 T"—2007(formerly 121151T —1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 7 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) reasonable promptness.If appropriate,the Architect shall prepare and issue supplemental Drawings and Specifications in response to requests for information. §3.6.4.5 The Architect shall maintain a record of submittals and copies of submittals supplied by the Contractor in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. §3.6.5 CHANGES IN THE WORK §3.6.5.1 The Architect may authorize minor changes in the Work that are consistent with the intent of the Contract Documents and do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time. Subject to the provisions of Section 4.3,the Architect shall prepare Change Orders and Construction Change Directives for the Owner's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents. §3.6.5.2 The Architect shall maintain records relative to changes in the Work. §3.6.6 PROJECT COMPLETION §3.6.6.1 The Architect shall conduct inspections to determine the date or dates of Substantial Completion and the date of final completion;issue Certificates of Substantial Completion;receive from the Contractor and forward to the Owner,for the Owner's review and records,written warranties and related documents required by the Contract Documents and assembled by the Contractor;and issue a final Certificate for Payment based upon a final inspection indicating the Work complies with the requirements of the Contract Documents. §3.6.6.2 The Architect's inspections shall be conducted with the Owner to check conformance of the Work with the requirements of the Contract Documents and to verify the accuracy and completeness of the list submitted by the Contractor of Work to be completed or corrected. §3.6.6.3 When the Work is found to be substantially complete,the Architect shall inform the Owner about the balance of the Contract Sum remaining to be paid the Contractor,including the amount to be retained from the Contract Sum,if any,for final completion or correction of the Work. §3.6.6.4 The Architect shall forward to the Owner the following information received from the Contractor: (1) consent of surety or sureties,if any,to reduction in or partial release of retainage or the making of final payment; (2) affidavits,receipts,releases and waivers of liens or bonds indemnifying the Owner against liens; and(3)any other documentation required of the Contractor under the Contract Documents. §3.6.6.5 Upon request of the Owner,and prior to the expiration of one year from the date of Substantial Completion, the Architect shall,without additional compensation,conduct a meeting with the Owner to review the facility operations and performance. ARTICLE 4 ADDITIONAL SERVICES §4.1 Additional Services listed below are not included in Basic Services but may be required for the Project.The Architect shall provide the listed Additional Services only if specifically designated in the table below as the Architect's responsibility,and the Owner shall compensate the Architect as provided in Section 11.2. (Paragraph Deleted) N/A (Table Deleted) §4.2 Insert a description of each Additional Service designated in Section 4.1 as the Architect's responsibility,if not further described in an exhibit attached to this document. N/A for this project. AIA Document 13101 TM—2007(formerly B151 TM—1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights Init. reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 8 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07113/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) §4.3 Additional Services may be provided after execution of this Agreement,without invalidating the Agreement. Except for services required due to the fault of the Architect,any Additional Services provided in accordance with this Section 4.3 shall entitle the Architect to compensation pursuant to Section 11.3 and an appropriate adjustment in the Architect's schedule. §4.3.1 Upon recognizing the need to perform the following Additional Services,the Architect shall notify the Owner with reasonable promptness and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need. The Architect shall not proceed to provide the following services until the Architect receives the Owner's written authorization: .1 Services necessitated by a change in the Initial Information,previous instructions or approvals given by the Owner,or a material change in the Project including,but not limited to,size,quality, complexity,the Owner's schedule or budget for Cost of the Work,or procurement or delivery method; .2 Services necessitated by the Owner's request for extensive environmentally responsible design alternatives,such as unique system designs,in-depth material research,energy modeling,or LEEDS certification; .3 Changing or editing previously prepared Instruments of Service necessitated by the enactment or revision of codes,laws or regulations or official interpretations; .4 Services necessitated by decisions of the Owner not rendered in a timely manner or any other failure of performance on the part of the Owner or the Owner's consultants or contractors; .5 Preparing digital data for transmission to the Owner's consultants and contractors,or to other Owner authorized recipients; .6 Preparation of design and documentation for alternate bid or proposal requests proposed by the Owner; .7 Preparation for,and attendance at,a public presentation,meeting or hearing; .8 Preparation for,and attendance at a dispute resolution proceeding or legal proceeding,except where the Architect is party thereto; .9 Evaluation of the qualifications of bidders or persons providing proposals; .10 Consultation concerning replacement of Work resulting from fire or other cause during construction; or .11 Assistance to the Initial Decision Maker,if other than the Architect. §4.3.2 To avoid delay in the Construction Phase,the Architect shall provide the following Additional Services, notify the Owner with reasonable promptness,and explain the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need.If the Owner subsequently determines that all or parts of those services are not required,the Owner shall give prompt written notice to the Architect,and the Owner shall have no further obligation to compensate the Architect for those services: 1 Reviewing a Contractor's submittal out of sequence from the submittal schedule agreed to by the Architect; .2 Responding to the Contractor's requests for information that are not prepared in accordance with the Contract Documents or where such information is available to the Contractor from a careful study and comparison of the Contract Documents,field conditions,other Owner-provided information, Contractor-prepared coordination drawings,or prior Project correspondence or documentation; .3 Preparing Change Orders and Construction Change Directives that require evaluation of Contractor's proposals and supporting data,or the preparation or revision of Instruments of Service; .4 Evaluating an extensive number of Claims as the Initial Decision Maker; .5 Evaluating substitutions proposed by the Owner or Contractor and making subsequent revisions to Instruments of Service resulting therefrom;or .6 To the extent the Architect's Basic Services are affected,providing Construction Phase Services 60 days after(1)the date of Substantial Completion of the Work or(2)the anticipated date of Substantial Completion identified in Initial Information,whichever is earlier. §4.3.3 The Architect shall provide Construction Phase Services exceeding the limits set forth below as Additional Services.When the limits below are reached,the Architect shall notify the Owner: .1 Unlimited reviews of each Shop Drawing,Product Data item,sample and similar submittal of the Contractor Init. AIA Document B101 T"—2007(formerly B151 TM—1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 9 this AIA®Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3139ADA25) .2 Bi-weekly visits to the site by the Architect over the duration of the Project during construction .3 Three(3)inspections for any portion of the Work to determine whether such portion of the Work is substantially complete in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents .4 One(1)final inspection for any portion of the Work to determine final completion and one year-end warranty inspection. §4.3.4 If the services covered by this Agreement have not been completed within (24)months of the date of this Agreement,through no fault of the Architect,extension of the Architect's services beyond that time shall be compensated as Additional Services. ARTICLE 5 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES §5.1 Unless otherwise provided for under this Agreement,the Owner shall provide information in a timely manner regarding requirements for and limitations on the Project,including a written program which shall set forth the Owner's objectives,schedule,constraints and criteria,including space requirements and relationships,flexibility, expandability,special equipment,systems and site requirements.Within 15 days after receipt of a written request from the Architect,the Owner shall furnish the requested information as necessary and relevant for the Architect to evaluate,give notice of or enforce lien rights. §5.2 The Owner shall establish and periodically update the Owner's budget for the Project,including(1)the budget for the Cost of the Work as defined in Section 6.1; (2)the Owner's other costs;and,(3)reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs.If the Owner significantly increases or decreases the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work,the Owner shall notify the Architect.The Owner and the Architect shall thereafter agree to a corresponding change in the Project's scope and quality. §5.3 The Owner shall identify a representative authorized to act on the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner shall render decisions and approve the Architect's submittals in a timely manner in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the Architect's services. §5.4 The Owner shall furnish surveys to describe physical characteristics,legal limitations and utility locations for the site of the Project,and a written legal description of the site.The surveys and legal information shall include,as applicable,grades and lines of streets,alleys,pavements and adjoining property and structures; designated wetlands; adjacent drainage;rights-of-way,restrictions,easements,encroachments,zoning,deed restrictions,boundaries and contours of the site;locations,dimensions and necessary data with respect to existing buildings,other improvements and trees;and information concerning available utility services and lines,both public and private,above and below grade,including inverts and depths.All the information on the survey shall be referenced to a Project benchmark. § 5.5 The Owner shall furnish services of geotechnical engineers,which may include but are not limited to test borings,test pits,determinations of soil bearing values,percolation tests,evaluations of hazardous materials,seismic evaluation,ground corrosion tests and resistivity tests,including necessary operations for anticipating subsoil conditions,with written reports and appropriate recommendations. §5.6 The Owner shall coordinate the services of its own consultants with those services provided by the Architect. Upon the Architect's request,the Owner shall furnish copies of the scope of services in the contracts between the Owner and the Owner's consultants.The Owner shall furnish the services of consultants other than those designated in this Agreement,or authorize the Architect to furnish them as an Additional Service,when the Architect requests such services and demonstrates that they are reasonably required by the scope of the Project.The Owner shall require that its consultants maintain professional liability insurance as appropriate to the services provided. §5.7 The Owner shall furnish tests,inspections and reports required by law or the Contract Documents,such as structural,mechanical,and chemical tests,tests for air and water pollution,and tests for hazardous materials. §5.8 The Owner shall furnish all legal,insurance and accounting services,including auditing services,that may be reasonably necessary at any time for the Project to meet the Owner's needs and interests. §5.9 The Owner shall provide prompt written notice to the Architect if the Owner becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project,including errors,omissions or inconsistencies in the Architect's Instruments of Service. AIA Document B101 TM—2007(formerly B151-—1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights Init. reserved.WARNING:This AIA®Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 10 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3139ADA25) §5.10 Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement,or when direct communications have been specially authorized,the Owner shall endeavor to communicate with the Contractor and the Architect's consultants through the Architect about matters arising out of or relating to the Contract Documents. The Owner shall promptly notify the Architect of any direct communications that may affect the Architect's services. §5.11 Before executing the Contract for Construction,the Owner shall coordinate the Architect's duties and responsibilities set forth in the Contract for Construction with the Architect's services set forth in this Agreement. The Owner shall provide the Architect a copy of the executed agreement between the Owner and Contractor, including the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. §5.12 The Owner shall provide the Architect access to the Project site prior to commencement of the Work and shall obligate the Contractor to provide the Architect access to the Work wherever it is in preparation or progress. ARTICLE 6 COST OF THE WORK §6.1 For purposes of this Agreement,the Cost of the Work shall be the total cost to the Owner to construct all elements of the Project designed or specified by the Architect and shall include contractors'general conditions costs, construction manager's fees,if any,and overhead and profit.The Cost of the Work does not include the compensation of the Architect,the costs of the land,rights-of-way,financing,contingencies for changes in the Work or other costs that are the responsibility of the Owner. §6.2 The Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work is provided in Initial Information,and may be adjusted throughout the Project as required under Sections 5.2,6.4 and 6.5. Evaluations of the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work,the preliminary estimate of the Cost of the Work and updated estimates of the Cost of the Work prepared by the Architect,represent the Architect's judgment as a design professional.It is recognized,however,that neither the Architect nor the Owner has control over the cost of labor,materials or equipment;the Contractor's methods of determining bid prices;or competitive bidding,market or negotiating conditions.Accordingly,the Architect cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work or from any estimate of the Cost of the Work or evaluation prepared or agreed to by the Architect. §6.3 In preparing estimates of the Cost of Work,the Architect shall be permitted to include contingencies for design,bidding and price escalation;to determine what materials,equipment,component systems and types of construction are to be included in the Contract Documents;to make reasonable adjustments in the program and scope of the Project;and to include in the Contract Documents alternate bids as may be necessary to adjust the estimated Cost of the Work to meet the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work.The Architect's estimate of the Cost of the Work shall be based on current area,volume or similar conceptual estimating techniques.If the Owner requests detailed cost estimating services,the Architect shall provide such services as an Additional Service under Article 4. §6.4 If the Bidding or Negotiation Phase has not commenced within 90 days after the Architect submits the Construction Documents to the Owner,through no fault of the Architect,the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work shall be adjusted to reflect changes in the general level of prices in the applicable construction market. §6.5 If at any time the Architect's estimate of the Cost of the Work exceeds the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work,the Architect shall make appropriate recommendations to the Owner to adjust the Project's size,quality or budget for the Cost of the Work,and the Owner shall cooperate with the Architect in making such adjustments. §6.6 If the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the conclusion of the Construction Documents Phase Services is exceeded by the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal,the Owner shall .1 give written approval of an increase in the budget for the Cost of the Work; .2 authorize rebidding or renegotiating of the Project within a reasonable time; .3 terminate in accordance with Section 9.5; .4 in consultation with the Architect,revise the Project program,scope,or quality as required to reduce the Cost of the Work;or .5 implement any other mutually acceptable alternative. §6.7 If the Owner chooses to proceed under Section 6.6.4,the Architect,without additional compensation,shall modify the Construction Documents as necessary to comply with the Owner's budget for the Cost of the Work at the Init. AIA Document 8101 T"—2007(formerly B751 T —1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) conclusion of the Construction Documents Phase Services,or the budget as adjusted under Section 6.6.1.The Architect's modification of the Construction Documents shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility under this Article 6. ARTICLE 7 COPYRIGHTS AND LICENSES §7.1 The Architect and the Owner warrant that in transmitting Instruments of Service,or any other information,the transmitting party is the copyright owner of such information or has permission from the copyright owner to transmit such information for its use on the Project.If the Owner and Architect intend to transmit Instruments of Service or any other information or documentation in digital form,they shall endeavor to establish necessary protocols governing such transmissions. §7.2 The Architect and the Architect's consultants shall be deemed the authors and owners of their respective Instruments of Service,including the Drawings and Specifications,and shall retain all common law,statutory and other reserved rights,including copyrights. Submission or distribution of Instruments of Service to meet official regulatory requirements or for similar purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the reserved rights of the Architect and the Architect's consultants. §7.3 Upon execution of this Agreement,the Architect grants to the Owner a nonexclusive license to use the Architect's Instruments of Service solely and exclusively for purposes of constructing,using,maintaining,altering and adding to the Project,provided that the Owner substantially performs its obligations,including prompt payment of all sums when due,under this Agreement.The Architect shall obtain similar nonexclusive licenses from the Architect's consultants consistent with this Agreement.The license granted under this section permits the Owner to authorize the Contractor, Subcontractors, Sub-subcontractors,and material or equipment suppliers,as well as the Owner's consultants and separate contractors,to reproduce applicable portions of the Instruments of Service solely and exclusively for use in performing services or construction for the Project.If the Architect rightfully terminates this Agreement for cause as provided in Section 9.4,the license granted in this Section 7.3 shall terminate. §7.3.1 In the event the Owner uses the Instruments of Service without retaining the author of the Instruments of Service,the Owner releases the Architect and Architect's consultant(s)from all claims and causes of action arising from such uses.The Owner,to the extent permitted by law,further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Architect and its consultants from all costs and expenses,including the cost of defense,related to claims and causes of action asserted by any third person or entity to the extent such costs and expenses arise from the Owner's use of the Instruments of Service under this Section 7.3.1.The terms of this Section 7.3.1 shall not apply if the Owner rightfully terminates this Agreement for cause under Section 9.4. §7.4 Except for the licenses granted in this Article 7,no other license or right shall be deemed granted or implied under this Agreement.The Owner shall not assign,delegate,sublicense,pledge or otherwise transfer any license granted herein to another party without the prior written agreement of the Architect.Any unauthorized use of the Instruments of Service shall be at the Owner's sole risk and without liability to the Architect and the Architect's consultants. ARTICLE 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES §8.1 GENERAL §8.1.1 The Owner and Architect shall commence all claims and causes of action,whether in contract,tort,or otherwise,against the other arising out of or related to this Agreement in accordance with the requirements of the method of binding dispute resolution selected in this Agreement within the period specified by applicable law,but in any case not more than 10 years after the date of Substantial Completion of the Work.The Owner and Architect waive all claims and causes of action not commenced in accordance with this Section 8.1.1. §8.1.2 To the extent damages are covered by property insurance,the Owner and Architect waive all rights against each other and against the contractors,consultants,agents and employees of the other for damages,except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance as set forth in AIA Document A201-2007,General Conditions of the Contract for Construction.The Owner or the Architect,as appropriate,shall require of the contractors,consultants,agents and employees of any of them similar waivers in favor of the other parties enumerated herein. §8.1.3 The Architect shall indemnify and hold the Owner and the Owner's officers and employees harmless from AIA Document 8101 TM—2007(formerly B151 T —1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights Init. reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 12 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (369ADA25) and against damages,losses and judgments arising from claims by third parties,including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses recoverable under applicable law,but only to the extent they are caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the Architect,its employees and its consultants in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. The Architect's duty to indemnify the Owner under this provision shall be limited to the available proceeds of insurance coverage. §8.2 MEDIATION §8.2.1 Any claim,dispute or other matter in question arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to binding dispute resolution. If such matter relates to or is the subject of a lien arising out of the Architect's services,the Architect may proceed in accordance with applicable law to comply with the lien notice or filing deadlines prior to resolution of the matter by mediation or by binding dispute resolution. §8.2.2 The Owner and Architect shall endeavor to resolve claims,disputes and other matters in question between them by mediation which,unless the parties mutually agree otherwise,shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Construction Industry Mediation Procedures in effect on the date of the Agreement.A request for mediation shall be made in writing,delivered to the other party to the Agreement,and filed with the person or entity administering the mediation.The request may be made concurrently with the filing of a complaint or other appropriate demand for binding dispute resolution but,in such event,mediation shall proceed in advance of binding dispute resolution proceedings,which shall be stayed pending mediation for a period of 60 days from the date of filing,unless stayed for a longer period by agreement of the parties or court order. If an arbitration proceeding is stayed pursuant to this section,the parties may nonetheless proceed to the selection of the arbitrator(s) and agree upon a schedule for later proceedings. §8.2.3 The parties shall share the mediator's fee and any filing fees equally. The mediation shall be held in the place where the Project is located,unless another location is mutually agreed upon.Agreements reached in mediation shall be enforceable as settlement agreements in any court having jurisdiction thereof. §8.2.4 If the parties do not resolve a dispute through mediation pursuant to this Section 8.2,the method of binding dispute resolution shall be the following: (Paragraph Deleted) [ ] Arbitration pursuant to Section 8.3 of this Agreement [X] Litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction [] Other(Specify) (Paragraphs Deleted) ARTICLE 9 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION §9.1 If the Owner fails to make payments to the Architect in accordance with this Agreement,such failure shall be considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination or,at the Architect's option,cause for suspension of performance of services under this Agreement.If the Architect elects to suspend services,the Architect shall give seven days'written notice to the Owner before suspending services.In the event of a suspension of services,the Architect shall have no liability to the Owner for delay or damage caused the Owner because of such suspension of services.Before resuming services,the Architect shall be paid all sums due prior to suspension and any expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services.The Architect's fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted. Init. AIA Document B101 TM—2007(formerly B151 TM—1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 13 this AIAa Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3139ADA25) §9.2 If the Owner suspends the Project,the Architect shall be compensated for services performed prior to notice of such suspension.When the Project is resumed,the Architect shall be compensated for expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Architect's services. The Architect's fees for the remaining services and the time schedules shall be equitably adjusted. §9.3 If the Owner suspends the Project for more than 90 cumulative days for reasons other than the fault of the Architect,the Architect may terminate this Agreement by giving not less than seven days'written notice. §9.4 Either party may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party initiating the termination. §9.5 The Owner may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days'written notice to the Architect for the Owner's convenience and without cause. §9.6 In the event of termination not the fault of the Architect,the Architect shall be compensated for services performed prior to termination,together with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Section 9.7. §9.7 Termination Expenses are in addition to compensation for the Architect's services and include expenses directly attributable to termination for which the Architect is not otherwise compensated,plus an amount for the Architect's anticipated profit on the value of the services not performed by the Architect. §9.8 The Owner's rights to use the Architect's Instruments of Service in the event of a termination of this Agreement are set forth in Article 7 and Section 11.9. ARTICLE 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS §10.1 This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located,except that if the parties have selected arbitration as the method of binding dispute resolution,the Federal Arbitration Act shall govern Section 8.3. §10.2 Terms in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as those in AIA Document A201-2007, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. §10.3 The Owner and Architect,respectively,bind themselves,their agents,successors,assigns and legal representatives to this Agreement.Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign this Agreement without the written consent of the other,except that the Owner may assign this Agreement to a lender providing financing for the Project if the lender agrees to assume the Owner's rights and obligations under this Agreement. §10.4 If the Owner requests the Architect to execute certificates,the proposed language of such certificates shall be submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to the requested dates of execution.If the Owner requests the Architect to execute consents reasonably required to facilitate assignment to a lender,the Architect shall execute all such consents that are consistent with this Agreement,provided the proposed consent is submitted to the Architect for review at least 14 days prior to execution. The Architect shall not be required to execute certificates or consents that would require knowledge,services or responsibilities beyond the scope of this Agreement. §10.5 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the Owner or Architect. §10.6 Unless otherwise required in this Agreement,the Architect shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence,handling,removal or disposal of,or exposure of persons to,hazardous materials or toxic substances in any form at the Project site. §10.6.1 The Client agrees,notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,to the fullest extent permitted by law,to indemnify and hold harmless the Architect,its officers,partners,employees and subconsultants(collectively, Consultant)from and against any and all claims,suits,demands,liabilities,losses,damages or costs,including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs arising out of or in any way connected with the detection,presence, AIA Document 8101 TM—2007(formerly B151 T —1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights Init. reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 14 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) handling,removal,abatement,or disposal of any asbestos or hazardous or toxic substances,products or materials that exist on, about or adjacent to the Project site,whether liability arises under breach of contract or warranty,tort, including negligence,strict liability or statutory liability,regulatory or any other cause of action,except for the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Architect. §10.7 The Architect shall have the right to include photographic or artistic representations of the design of the Project among the Architect's promotional and professional materials. The Architect shall be given reasonable access to the completed Project to make such representations.However,the Architect's materials shall not include the Owner's confidential or proprietary information if the Owner has previously advised the Architect in writing of the specific information considered by the Owner to be confidential or proprietary. The Owner shall provide professional credit for the Architect in the Owner's promotional materials for the Project. § 10.8 If the Architect or Owner receives information specifically designated by the other party as"confidential"or "business proprietary,"the receiving party shall keep such information strictly confidential and shall not disclose it to any other person except to(1)its employees,(2)those who need to know the content of such information in order to perform services or construction solely and exclusively for the Project,or(3)its consultants and contractors whose contracts include similar restrictions on the use of confidential information. ARTICLE 11 COMPENSATION §11.1 For the Architect's Basic Services described under Article 3,the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Paragraph Deleted) Compensation shall be Hourly Not to Exceed$206,390.00. Said fee to include all consultants/engineers along with any/all reimbursable expenses. Building Survey/Assessment is due February 15,2019. Attached as Exhibit `A"is copy of original ISG proposal dated May 3, 2018. Services available to Owner are: • Custom prioritization approach that incorporates engineering,planning,and funding expertise to outline recommended improvements ranked based on cost,immediacy,and range of time in which opportunities should be addressed. • Comprehensive and well-organized summary of assessment findings that focus on cross reference imagery, site and assessment findings,and relevant City data,supported by multidisciplinary team,including a Facilities Management and Planning professional with 30+years as director of campus facilities. • Focused solutions customized to community needs backed by an intimate connection to Waterloo and understanding of City permitting and facility requirements,allowing ISG to work nimbly throughout the process and offer detailed recommendations that comply with local code ordinances. • Integration of 3D scanning,drone,and other unique survey/assessment methods that will provide more than just imagery,but rather in-depth,layered visibility into current and future needs. §11.2 For Additional Services designated in Section 4.1,the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Paragraph Deleted) N/A Init. AIA Document B1011—2007(formerly B151 T'"—1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.WARNING:This AIA®Document is protected by U.S.copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 15 this AIA®Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible / under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3139ADA25) §11.3 For Additional Services that may arise during the course of the Project,including those under Section 4.3,the Owner shall compensate the Architect as follows: (Paragraph Deleted) N/A §11.4 Compensation for Additional Services of the Architect's consultants when not included in Section 11.2 or 11.3,shall be the amount invoiced to the Architect plus a multiple of one and 15/100 (1.15 ),or as otherwise stated below: Only if the Owner requests work of consultants outside our proposal scope. §11.5 Where compensation for Basic Services is based on a stipulated sum or percentage of the Cost of the Work, the compensation for each phase of services shall be as follows: (Table Deleted) N/A (Paragraph Deleted) §11.7 The hourly billing rates for services of the Architect and the Architect's consultants,if any,are set forth below.The rates shall be adjusted in accordance with the Architect's and Architect's consultants' normal review practices. (Paragraph Deleted) See Hourly Rate Table marked as Exhibit`B"attached. (Table Deleted) §11.8 COMPENSATION FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES NIA §11.8.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic and Additional Services and include expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants directly related to the Project,as follows: (Paragraphs Deleted) §11.8.2 For Reimbursable Expenses the compensation shall be the expenses incurred by the Architect and the Architect's consultants plus a multiple of one and 15/100 (1.15 )of the expenses incurred. See 11.8.1. N/A AIA Document B101 TM—2007(formerly 8151 TM—1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights Init. reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 16 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) §11.9 COMPENSATION FOR USE OF ARCHITECT'S INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE If the Owner terminates the Architect for its convenience under Section 9.5,or the Architect terminates this Agreement under Section 9.3,the Owner shall pay a licensing fee as compensation for the Owner's continued use of the Architect's Instruments of Service solely for purposes of completing,using and maintaining the Project as follows: §11.10 PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT §11.10.1 An initial payment of ($0.00)shall be made upon execution of this Agreement and is the minimum payment under this Agreement. It shall be credited to the Owner's account in the final invoice. §11.10.2 Unless otherwise agreed,payments for services shall be made monthly in proportion to services performed. Payments are due and payable upon presentation of the Architect's invoice.Amounts unpaid thirty(30 )days after the invoice date shall bear interest at the rate entered below,or in the absence thereof at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Architect. (Paragraph Deleted) §11.10.3 The Owner shall not withhold amounts from the Architect's compensation to impose a penalty or liquidated damages on the Architect,or to offset sums requested by or paid to contractors for the cost of changes in the Work unless the Architect agrees or has been found liable for the amounts in a binding dispute resolution proceeding. § 11.10.4 Records of Reimbursable Expenses,expenses pertaining to Additional Services,and services performed on the basis of hourly rates shall be available to the Owner at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 12 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Special terms and conditions that modify this Agreement are as follows: ARTICLE 13 SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT §13.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations,representations or agreements,either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Owner and Architect. § 13.2 This Agreement is comprised of the following documents listed below: .1 AIA Document B101T"-2007,Standard Form Agreement Between Owner and Architect .2 Exhibit"A"copy of ISG proposal to City of Waterloo dated: May 3,2018. .3 Exhibit"B"copy of Hourly Rate Table. (Paragraph Deleted) Init. AIA Document 13101 TM—2007(formerly B1511—1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 17 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3139ADA25) (Paragraph Deleted) This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first written above. OWNER ARCHI ECT (Signature) (Signature) Quentin M.Hart,Mayor Tim Verheyen,PE Principal (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) AIA Document B701 T"—2007(formerly 8151 T —1997).Copyright©1974,1978,1987,1997 and 2007 by The American Institute of Architects.All rights Init. reserved.WARNING:This AIA® Document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties.Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of 18 this AIA® Document,or any portion of it,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible t under the law.This document was produced by AIA software at 12:41:42 on 06/07/2018 under Order No.8977062192 which expires on 07/13/2018,and is not for resale. User Notes: (3B9ADA25) CITY CSF WATERLOG BUILDINGS SURVEY STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS BLACK HAWK SPRINKLER BUILDING 2 BOATHOUSE , 3 BYRNES PARK POOL CARNEGIE ANNEX CEDAR VALLEY SPORTSPLEX Co s WATERLOO CENTER FOR THE ARTS CITY HALL FIRE STATION#1 „kq 9 FIRE STATION#2 0 16 FIRE STATION#3 n Y FIRE STATION#4 FIRE STATION#5 { : FIRE STATION#6 20. 23 GATES PARK CLUBHOUSE � GATES PARK POOL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS s; TRAINING CENTER IRV WARREN CLUBHOUSE LEISURE SERVICES OFFICE � LIBRARY �� pr POLICE EVIDENCE STORAGE BUILDING POLICE SHOOTING RANGE 2 .# PUBLIC MARKET PUBLIC WORKS 3 , 24 RIVERFRONT STADIUM SOUTH HILLS CLUBHOUSE 26 UNICUE VETERANS MEMORIAL HALL Q WASTE MANAGEMENT 6 YOUNG ARENA 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIRM PROFILE TEAM QUALIFICATIONS RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE PROPOSED PROCESS STRU TUBE RE; STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF WATERLOO BUILDINGS SURVEY WATERLOO, IOWA Noel, As the City of Waterloo proactively plans for capital expenditures, ISG and StruXture understands the City seeks a firm to assess the condition of several properties, and to quantify maintenance and component replacement requirements. This is a critical endeavor, as healthy and functional buildings that promote an excellent environment in which to work and do business are needed to continue to support City residents. ISG and StruXture enjoyed walking through these facilities located in our own backyard, and are eager to offer our multidisciplinary facility assessment expertise as a dedicated partner and advocate, providing the City with a comprehensive view of the current state of City facilities and opportunities for future improvement. COMBINED FORCES + MULTIDISCIPLINARY SOLUTIONS ISG and StruXture have an extensive background conducting facility studies consisting of both City space evaluation as well as identifying physical characteristics related to current building conditions. Since the two firms joined forces in January of 2018, we now offer strengthened services backed by multidisciplinary design, engineering, planning, and environmental expertise. In-house drone,3D scanning, and visualization services also allow our delivery to be efficient, accurate, and cutting-edge. Capitalizing on our synergy as becoming one firm, ISG will conduct a thorough assessment of City systems, helping staff identify beneficial project prioritization and financial planning strategies.What separates a unique, custom deliverable from an average assessment is the ability to do more than just look at the surface level conditions.Through a multidisciplinary lens, ISG's team of engineers, architects, and project managers will work in close collaboration with the City, building users, and other identified stakeholders throughout the entire project process to integrate current and future needs and conditions with cutting-edge technology that will aid the accuracy and depth of the report.Together, ISG and StruXture are eager, ready, and committed to leverage our complementary services and experience as a unified firm team by providing the following advantages: • Custom prioritization approach that incorporates engineering,planning,and funding expertise to outline recommended improvements ranked based on cost, immediacy, and range of time in which opportunities should be addressed. • Comprehensive and well-organized summary of assessment findings that focus on cross reference imagery,site and assessment findings, and relevant City data,supported by multidisciplinary team,including a Facilities Management and Planning professional with 30+years as director of campus facilities. • Focused solutions customized to community needs backed by an intimate connection to Waterloo and understanding of City permitting and facility requirements, allowing ISG to work nimbly throughout the process and offer detailed recommendations that comply with local code ordinances. + ht �:_ G G + a + STRUXTURE • Integration of 3D scanning, drone, and other unique survey/assessment methods that will provide more than just imagery, but rather in-depth, layered visibility into current and future needs. More than just reporting the basics, ISG looks forward to providing a comprehensive, insightful assessment that will act as a critical resource for the City and growth stakeholders. We have provided an outline of our approach in the following pages, along with a snapshot of recent facility planning experience.We look forward to providing responsive service and focused solutions in support of the continuation of a strong future for the City of Waterloo. Sincerely, Tim Verheyen, PE Dan Channer,AIA Principal Principal and Senior Architect + V Ca. t 1j + _ _ _ + vV V l ^" c_ Y + ISG has a rich history, that extends over 40 years, of building trusting relationships with I clients, stakeholders, and the community. As amulti-disciplinary firm that is 100 percent JOINING • ' S owned by employees, ISG serves numerous markets and fosters strong collaboration between all disciplines providing clients a diverse knowledge base, high level of creativity, As of January 2, 2018, ISG has and broad perspective.ISG's business philosophy is centered around building relationships, joined forces with the reputable translating experience across synergistic markets to the advantage of partners, and architecture and interior design firm, constantly striving to add value to services by seeking new and creative technologies, StruXture Architects (StruXture), professionals, and ideas. ISG's flexibility makes it possible: our focus and innovative StruXture will continue to provide solutions make it happen. custom solutions with the noted adding backing brought forth by ISG. "One of many great reasons why we (StuXture) joined forces with ISG was due to the fact that we are not bound by geography or services when we need to support clients. With a one fim-) mentality, ' we are able to offer full, multi- disciplinary and market solutions regardless of numbers within our office." states Craig Schwerdtfeger, AIA, ISG Principal, Senior Architect. "However. we are deeply committed to r^e community and !nd *I ie. Opportunity to bring In talent from other areas inside and SERVICES outside of the State truly unique," notes Craig. XTURE IISG EMPLOYEES270+ D 1 9 OFFICES • + FIRM PRO IOWA TIES 85+ YEARS IN WATERLOO 1 55+ IOWA PROFESSIONALS i 50- IA COUNTIES SERVED ISG's experience working directly with area municipal clients has given our team valuable CITY O F EAGLE GROVE insight into the specific needs cities and communities require. In addition, ISG has worked Eagle Grove, IA with Iowa partners across multiple disciplines, including Sports and Recreation, Civic and Culture, Public Works. and Government. This broad experience across marl<ets leads to CITY OF WEST focused solutions when assessing a wide range of City buildings that includes fire stations, DES MOINES Byrnes Park Pool, Cedar Valley Sportsplex. Waterloo Center for the Arts, and Veterans West Des Moines, IA Memorial Hall. A snapshot of such clients and partners is outlined along the right side of CITY OF SIOUX CITY this page. Sioux City, IA BLACK HAWK COUNTY YMCA Waterloo, IA SAC CITY POOL Sac City, IA Or O CEDAR FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY Cedar Falls, IA STORM LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT Storm Lake, IA WATERLOO FIRE STATION #2 Waterloo, IA NORTH IOWA JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER Waterloo, IA WATERLOO • • • N SNAPSHOT ISG employees work live, and play in the City of Waterloo (City) area,which is exactly why our firm is so invested in helping strengthen . grow the community. Likewise, as neighborsand close partners, • served as a dedicated supporter of a numberof s organizations, programs, and non-profit groups. These contributions to a variety of economic, philanthropic, and education pr ograms reflects our • - to the community and shared investment in supportingdynamic and vibrant opportunities for - businesses, ! individuals j GL AL Thi.kg i <� rtiaCouKu:rc CE►'�fiR Wax so V1ILLEY XAWKEYE DIRECT UNDERSTANDING Whether through renovation or new design,the ISG and StRiXture team has completed work in more than a third of the buildings on the assessment list for this survey,This intimate familarity with City-owned buildings and their systems will lead to more streamlined assessments with a better-understanding of opportunities for efficiencies and cost savings. In addition, a local presence will allow for a true partnership approach and face-to-face meetings as needed. BUILDINGS SURVEY ALIGNMENT I . UNDERSTAND CITY . TM` NEEDS Facilites Management Planner Kevin a+ Hildebrandt,vii,walk through each of he oust n and Derfo rn Dre asses ren_a rorung any areas of concern. this will provde enhanced effioency when discipline ieade,s oerfom^their assessments, 2. PRIORITIZE IMPROVEMENTS J� a tried andto r o lorry a�k.ng ,r <,sL n7 a &ion+ .oilabo i` with io us ;rens lV.`e;`oo,ISG=,;;it J _ ,adm o'or- 3 ot 3 . DETERMINE COSTS B> �s ng in ous e cos*estimation expertise and incorporatii.g any data o- s/sterns❑sed by the City,ISG Ad!provide an expenditure plan that can be sorted by year,system and pnonty. .- CITY BUILDINGS • • + fAQUALIFICATIONS FOCUS ON WHAT MATTERS MOST One of the greatest advantages of working with ISG is the peace of mind that our recommendations will align with the full spectrum of facility systems. Without this multidisciplinary expertise, even simple changes to a facility or site can have unforeseen effects on other elements of a space, leaving gaps in evaluation and surprises during improvement design and construction. With an opportunity to work with the City to review current systems across multiple buildings, our team will approach evaluations armed with this added perspective. CONTINUITY + BUILDING CODE RELIABILITY IN BUILDING + PERMITTING SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS The overall physical condition ISG is extremely familiar and of each building and supportive verse with code requirements and infrastructure will be fully evaluated in potential paperwork headaches order to develop a meaningful set of that can result from only basic, recommendations. ISG will investigate surface level analysis. With civil critical systems and components of engineers and environmental each structure's site, and associated scientists in-house,the review infrastructure ensuring maximumteam has a detailed eye for site continuity and reliability in all solutions and infrastructure needs that can posed. impact future code and permitting ' requirements. .7 PROXIMITY + LISTENING + TRUST ° " ' = RESPONSIVENESS ISG's team operates with the With an office location in Waterloo, understanding that feedback from ISG has the ability to meet face- everyday users of the space is critical to to-face and efficiently review each assessing building efficiency and offering facility.This closeness cuts down recommendations that guide the City to a on travel times and costs, reduces positive future. opportunity for communication gaps, and provides a City partner that will truly be present and attentive to needs. COST ESTIMATING + FUNDING .... . ..... ........ ..........._..._.._. _ _. __.. ....._... . Implementation of changes will have a financial impact. Some changes may yield a financial savings through operational efficiencies, and other changes may require an investment of capital dollars to maintain and/or improve facilities ISG will work with the City to identify financial impacts to potential changes and to determine approximate savings opportunities and/or investment needs for various options to be considered. In addition, ISG's funding experts can help identify potential grants and programs to assist with any needed improvements. + _ + TEAM QUA DESIGN PHILOSOPHY ISG has been built on a model of service to our clients. We are based on the premise that although we possess strong design skills in many building types, each project is individual to that client, and deserves our full attention in understanding their goals, dreams and requirements. Careful listening is a skill we find in short supply by many of our competitors,but truly listening and understanding is the base foundation for an excellent assessment.To do so, ISG works together to leverage a shared understanding of the assessments goals when developing focused solutions.This process emphasizes the need for approaching each site as an interdependent collection of multiple facility improvement efforts, each of which directly contribute to the quality of a comprehensive report. COLLECTING THE RIGHT DATA I n order for a facility assessment to be useful to the City,it must include all the data fields the City uses.ISG will review the data fields the City uses,identify additional needed data fields,and refine and customize site visit checklists to capture the appropriate information in the requested timeframe. CREATING A LIVING DOCUMENT ISG understands that report format that can be easily exported into Excel for input and integration with existing facility management systems within the City will be critical for future use. ISG will work with the City to make sure our report format and data fields meet the City's needs. DEFINING CUTOFF FOR REPAIR VS. REPLACEMENT ISG will work with the City to determine a cutoff amount for repair versus replacement when it comes to City buildings and facility equipment. Defining this number ahead of time will 'help justify costs when needed. ESTABLISHING PRIORITIES ISG understands that reports will be used for decision making related to capital planning and deferred maintenance expenditures,which means recommendations will need to be clearly prioritized. During the kickoff meeting,ISG will review and define priorities for the City,which will then be translated into priority charts throughout the report. ?R'ORIT" ISSUE DESCRIPTION Life Safety As typically noted by Fire Marshall/Life Safety Officials, Deterioration Further deterioration will create higher future repair costs or may cause damage to other areas of the structure. Areas that do not meet the state health code requirements.Mechanical systems that do not currently comply with ASHRAE Standards are given a Health high priority.However,these upgrades are not mandated and would not be required unless other substantial work is being done to the facility and systems in question. Accessibility Items that must be completed to allow access to the building or primary function areas within the building. Haz.Materials Items that pose a significant impact to building occupants. Energy Item results in payback within 10 years or less. Deterioration Material or system that currently functions but will require replacement or major maintenance within five years. Accessibility Modifications required to meet state guidelines. Haz.materials Removal of items affected by other changes occurring in Priority 2. Health Inadequate exhaust and ventilation near lob equipment or other areas locking adequate ventilation. EnergyItem results in payback in more than 10 years. Health Items that do not meet state health code requirements, Deterioration Material or system currently functions but will require replacement or major maintenance in 6-10 years. Haz.Materials Removal of item affected by other changes occurring in Priority 3. Aesthetics Item which impacts the visual environment. Haz.Materials Removal of items affected by other changes occurring in Priority 4. Accessibility Items which do not meet full requirements of federal accessibility guidelines. �r- tP, s =. + TEAM QUALIFICATIONS CAPACITY + ADVANTAGE ISG is eager to leverage the unique strengths and experiences within our firm to the benefit of the City buildings project in order to provide local and innovative services. Collectively, ISG + StruXture form one team, and this synthesis will help ensure transparent communication, accountability, and an in-depth buildings review. The synergy in the combined project delivery approach will make collaboration seamless, and lead to a more successful project overall.The below diagram illustrates the project leadership team,selected for their expertise in similar projects and facilities planning,as well as the multidisciplinary team of designers,engineers,and planners who will assist in the comprehensive audit of City buildings. PROJECT LEADERSHIP FULL SYSTEM PROJECT RESOURCES Tim Verheyen, PE Kevin Hildebrandt Amanda Prosser, PLA.,CPS( Dan Channer, AIA Tony Effenberger. PE.GEED AP Jane Miller, IIDA.LEM AP ID-C Mike Nelson. PE Bob Mickelson Brad Penar, PE.SF.[_EED AP THE VALUE OF WORKING WITH ONE FIRM Ratherthan reachingout • electrical, d other design assistance to - e balance across all City buildings is maintained, ISG's full-service team will streamline project processes and foster cohesive a- a- point during this comprehensive buildings survey, ISG is able to seamiessly pull resources from our team of 270+ employees to provide cross-disciplinary guidance, which w prove invaluable to the Water'loo communit 08 Q)T(� Fo 7oo 41 0 0 �. - ISG . . + TEAM QUALFCATIONS TIM VIRHEYEN, PE PRINCIPAL With more than 10 years of civil engineering experience in project management and civil engineering, Tim focuses on infristi- cture and engineering designs that support community advancement. In addition to leading the civil engineering team at ISG's Waterloo office, Tim brings direct expertise in land development planning, commercial site design, and transportation studies. Tim will serve as principal-in-charge for the Waterloo buildings survey project, coordinating across disciplines to achieve timely and creative solutions. E D U C A T 10 N: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville - Edwardsville, IL E M P H A S I S A R E A: Civil Engineering, Stonnwater Management, Connectivity, Leadership, Oversight DAN CHANNER, AIA PRINCIPAL AND SENIOR ARCHITECT A licensed architect,Dan is actively involved in all project phases from drawing to client management.With an open management style. Dan meets regularly with clients and project teams to review goals and milestones. His attention to detail and communication skills make him an effective project leader. His biggest passion is providing clients with unique project solutions to address their needs. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts in Architecture, Iowa State University-Apes, IA E MP H A S I S A R E A: Project Management, Code Evaivat ons.Ana'ysss + "ragramming, Flexibility KEVIN HILDEBRANDT Kevin •rings 30+years as Director of Buildings and Grounds for •• r- and knowledge in operating public facilities will provide translat.• • • for buildings surveyand in making recommendationsfor and future needs. By expertisehaving Kevin's on be the first boots on • • leader to determine scope of • can then advise ISG's intemal team of specialty focus areas.This will ensure that each facility is reviewed in a cohesive manner,while also allowing for maximum accountability and leadership, Kevin is a cun-ent Board Member and Past President of Minnesota Association of School Administrators. Impact, Lifecycle Analysis Facilities Assessments, Space Planning, Building Operations, Analysis, Funding/Cost + _TEAM QUALIFICATIONS TONY EFFENBERGER, PE, LEED AP PRINCIPAL AND MECHANICAL GROUP LEADER Tony has provided sustainable, cost-effective HVAC, plumbing, and dehumidification for numerous government facilities. His approach includes identifying critical components,gathering key data, and analyzing mechanical system options. This careful and thorough review results in the selection of efficient and cost- effective equipment to provide comfort and reliability to staff and public members utilizing the facility. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science In Mechanical Engineering - South Dakota State University - id Brookings, SD EMPHASIS AREA: Mechanical Engineering, HVAC + Energy Systems, Plumbing Systems, Longevity + Capacity NELSON, ' ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL AND ELECTRICAL GROUP LEADER Mike specializes in analyzing the requirements for a facility, then developing efficient and cost effective solutions to meet his clients'needs. Mike is responsible for the coordination of electrical and low voltage(AV, y communication, and security systems) requirements for all aspects of site plans including: lighting, security ` systems, closed circuit communications, equipment, computer, and life safety systems. Mike is well-versed in emergency, stand-by, and back-up power methods for communication and electrical systems in emergency service, municipal, government, public safety, and medical facilities. His experience includes designing the power, lighting, and fire alarm systems of all types of facilities. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineenng, Minnesota State University, Mankato - Mankato, MN E M P H A S I S A R E A: Electrical Engineering,AV and Low-Voltage, Life + Fire Safety, Interior+ Exterior Lighting, Longevity+ Capacity BRAD PENAR, PE, SE, LEED AP STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Brad provides structural analysis, design, and construction administration services for projects across ISG's market sectors. His experience includes building condition studies and structural investigations for a diverse range of government facilities.When worming with owners,architects,contractors and engineers, Brad strives for cost-effective solutions to complex design issues by thoroughly exploring various framing system options. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign - Urbana, IL; Master of Science, Georgia Institute of Technology-Atlanta, GA EMPHASIS AREA: Structural Engineering, Foundations + Systems Design, Structural Analysis, Longevity + Durability + __FEAM QUALIFICATIONS , AMANDA P • ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GROUP LEADER X Amanda specializes in urban design, including solutions that blend the built environment with local landscapes * and create welcoming sites for public facilities. Lighting, pavement, sidewalk, and curb improvements are but a few of the many customized solutions Amanda provides ISG's facility project clients. Her unique graphic design based perspective allows for creative ideas to be fully articulated, thus making sure the public can grasp and appreciate the nuances of a design or planning outcome.Amanda oversees the design of landscape architecture improvements and overall connectivity in close collaboration with ISG's team of civil engineers and architects. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Landscape Architecture+ Bachelor of Environmental Design,North Dakota State University- Fargo, ND E M P H A S I S A R E A: Land Use Planning, Connectivity,Transportation/Multi-modal Integration PRINCIPAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN GROUP LEADER `t Understanding community and stakeholders' design needs that are both functional and aesthetically pleasing ' is always a challenge that Jane is ready to tackle. She loves the problem-solving basis of interior design and has an intimate understanding of the community and funding tools needed to make designs come to fruition. Through extensive Iowa and overall market expertise, Jane is also acutely aware of project challenges and innovative solutions that have led to success in communities and clients throughout the Midwest. Through direct integration with ISG's in-house multidisciplinary team, Jane will be a critical leader for the City of Waterloo. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts in Design+ Human Environment, University of Northern Iowa-Cedar Falls, IA EMPHASIS AREA: Space Use, Materials, Flexibility BOB • SENIOR CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATOR Fire houses, city department buildings, human services facilities, and public utilities are but a few of the many projects Bob has managed on behalf of ISG. Conscious of funding, planning, operational, and cost- efficiency demands, Bob understands the important roles public facilities hold for communities and works with stakeholders to ensure designs are sustainable as well as functional for users and staff. Exemplifying ISG's client-focused approach, Bob also provides city clients site and building evaluations to assess conditions and plan for the future,as well as when instances of sudden or disruptive repairs are needed. EMPHASIS AREA: Cost Estimating,Quality Assurance/Control,Permitting,Funding,Phasing,Schedule n DYNAMIC + FOCUSED FOCAL POINTS Whether assessing the need for new spaces or renovation of existing facilities, each ISG ACCESSIBILITY project is strategically planned to accommodate the wants and needs of stakeholders while Consideration of Americans with continuously considering facility goals and financial constraints. Disabilities Act requirements throughout assessments. DURABILITY ' Utilization of materials that require minimal maintenance and withstand the test of time and use. LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY Facility planning and design supporting functional, affordable. and environmentally responsible public service buildings. ASSESSMENTS + PROJECTS OF EVERY SCALE COST-EFFECTIVENESS Projects ranging from small, targeted improvements and updates. to extensive expansion Improvement plans developed using and reconstruction of facilities, strategic cost-analysis of multiple design and material options. CUSTOM PLANNING FOR EVERY COMMUNITY COLLABORATION + Experience successfully planning for project improvements and implementing construction INNOVATION ac-;vides in rural and urban crJmmuntties across the Midwes. Engagement of Stakeholders and '`,'e public to identify needs and develop FEASIBLE FUNDING + REALISTIC MAINTENANCE community specific solutions. Developing realistic and accurate cost estimates with realistic maintenance to allow all users HIGH FUNCTIONALITY the ability to receive the public services they support as City residents. Incorporation of practical, easy to maintain staff administration, public service,waiting, and common areas. WORK:INGENUITY AT DRO ! .;.hay• BETHANYCOLLEGE STUDENT ! • ' ATHLETIC CENTER RENOVATIONSBALLPARK + R E_\/A NT �D' ROJ [ECT EXPERIENCE CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT UPPER MIDWEST KEY FOCAL POINTS ISG conducted a facilities assessment for over 5,7 million square feet located across nearly 30 Site visits at each location sites contained in 613 acres throughout the Upper Midwest. ISG visited each site and issued a comprehensive report including anticipated expenditures for the next five to ten years. Tight timeline 5.7 million square feet evaluated YEAR COMPLETED 2016 613 acres TEAM INVOLVED Bob Mickelson - Project Manager FORT DODGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FORT DODGE, IA KEY FOCAL POINTS The District asked ISG to evaluate 10-year recommendations their existing education facilities -6ritized list of 10 buildings assessed and develop a pi improvements, which would aid Pre-referendum planning the School Board in devising major Interviews with maintenance staff updates across the next ten years, Priority list,creation In addition to seven schools, 4 c-)mrr'unity;rpu! evaluations incoroorated a transportation 'garage, stadium, and administration building. For YEAR COMPLETED all sites, assessments focused on 2016 location, exterior, interior, structure, accessibility, safety, hazards, and CORE TEAM INVOLVED mechanical and electrical systems. Recommendations and probable costs were organized Tony Effenberger- Mechanical with a priority ranking by the immediacy of their implementation, such as if an issue needed Engineer, Mike Nelson - Electrical completion within two years, or between two and five. Engineer: Brad Penar- Structural Engineer _771,I J" RrL-- 'L-''-.VANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE NRHEG • • KEY FOCAL POINTS The NRHEG School Distract serves Deferred maintenance program approximately 900 students for the communities of New Richland, Planning and prioritization w{ + Hartland, Ellendale, Geneva, and the Comprehensive site and facility surrounding rural areas.Two facilities assessments of both sites house the teaming environments and Staff interviews associated support spaces for ISD 2168. In January 2017, NRHEG Public Multidisciplinary approach Schools authorized ISG to conduct a a facilities condition assessment of YEAR COMPLETED its buildings. The purpose of this 2017 assessment is multi-faceted,and when complete will assist the School Board CORE TEAM INVOLVED with planning for maintenance and Bob Mickelson - Project Manager improvements, informing residents of facility needs, prioritization of short- and long-term projects,strategies for financial planning,and the development and enhancement of a I 0-year facilities maintenance plan. COUNTYBLUE EARTH • KEY FOCAL POINTS Growth has continued in an upward Comprehensive review of all County trend in Blue Earth County.With that departments positive trend comes more residents Programming and growth projections and increased demand for County services.ISG worked with the County Coordination with County Board Board and facilities staff to perform a Multiple suggestions for addressing ` r comprehensive review of all County space needs departments, facilities, and projected increase in County employees. Through careful programming and YEAR COMPLETED growth projections, ISG presented 2016 the County Board with multiple CORE TEAM INVOLVED concepts for addressing the need for Tony Effenberger- Mechanical additional space, including renovations of existing facilities, renovations of leased space, and Engineer, Mike Nelson - Electrical new construction on County-owned land. Engineer + RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE JWP PUBLIC • • KEY FOCAL POINTS ISG completed a facilities assessment Renovation, reconfiguring, and .,.` for Janesville-Waldorf-Pemberton expansion of two floors UWP) Public Schools that prompted a renovation and expansion of Coordination with District and their two floors of the District's school financial advisor building. ISG assisted JWP and their Phasing plan financial advisor to plan this project Combination of multiple funding and combine multiple funding sources sources in order to accomplish the Prioritized facility needs report District's facility goals. The lower level of the building YEAR COMPLETED was substantially reconfigured and renovated to devote a full level of 2014 the facility to early childhood education, special education, and school age care programs. CORE TEAM INVOLVED Work on the main floor of the building included the addition of a new secured entrance Mike Nelson - Electrical Engineer and a renovation of the former main entry into an open and welcoming dual use cafeteria/ commons area. SCHOOLSSPRINGFIELD PUBLIC KEY FOCAL POINTS Springfield Public School serves roughly I 0-year facility planning 600 students from kindergarten through twelfth grade. This project Priority list was a multidisciplinary assessment Staff interviews that promoted improvement planning. Multidisciplinary approach ISG visited Springfield Public School to perform a comprehensive site and Good, better, best cost and facility evaluation, which included the equipment approach building's interior and exterior, current accessibility, electrical and mechanical technology, and life safety conditions YEAR COMPLETED among others. The team prepared 2016 an assessment report summarizing CORE TEAM INVOLVED findings and outlining a prioritized list of Bob Mickelson - Project Manager improvements that will assist the School Board in making informed decisions regarding future District projects. X RELEVANT PEXPERILENCE MARTINASSESSMENT KEY FOCAL POINTS Establishing the County Attorney and Space study of 18 County staff as full-time employees led the departments spread across five Martin County Commissioners to facilities reexamine the organization of their present facilities.To provide direction Interviews with department to the Commissioners for improving directors, County staff, and invested space usage and maximizing efficiency, stakeholders ISG performed a space study that Incorporation of projected analyzed 18 County Departments population data to plan for future spread out . across five different needs facilities. Investigatory inspections at each YEAR COMPLETED location solidified a precise 2016 comprehension of how workplaces were being utilized and could be improved. Inspections CORE TEAM INVOLVED included meeting with and surveying all 18 department directors on space needs and uses. Mike Nelson - Electrical Engineer Examinations incorporated building code requirements, accessibility, and security features. Information gathered from these observations and surveys guided preliminary office layouts. NICOLLET COUNTY KEY FOCAL POINTS Nicollet County relocated Brown- Maximizing space usage to bring Nicollet Community Health, Social scattered government services into Services, Public Health, and Veteran's one location Services into a new $11.4 million 52,490-square-foot facility, including facility. ISG guided reorganization offices and conference areas s.t efforts, providing schematic designs, construction documents, and Flexible design construction administration, to help Energy-efficient equipment Nicollet County bring together four departments in a more efficient and cost-effective manner. YEAR COMPLETED 2016 Maximizing space usage was an important consideration. The CORE TEAM INVOLVED 52,490-square-foot facility includes offices and conference areas that were designed with Mike Nelson - Electrical Engineer, Bob the flexibility to accommodate meetings, events, and even community emergency situations. Mickelson - Project Manager Having four departments under one roof facilitates better communication between offices while also saving the County money in rental and lease agreements. y + ;-'. + RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE • • EXPERIENCE• e 117� Following proven approach, ISG has helped �I numerous Iowa communities implement PMPs :7, illustrating our in-depth understanding of the nee� to incorporate pavement and transportation needs into every analysis. CITY OF CLARION To address poor road conditions. Clarion gained a system-wide approach that included a maintenance and replacement plan to use in the budgeting process. REFERENCE jori i f_'dR, ; S a 53 2 2347 CITY OF MONROE The community sought to improve road conditions while also reducing maintenance costs by implementing a consistent maintenance schedule to provide projected savings over the lifespan of their streets. REFERENCE � si^r 2r�s _ 64125')23st CITY OF WEST DES MOINES The City of West Des Moines continues to seek innovative ways to extend their street rehabilitation dollars, and has partnered with ISG to do so since 2016 REFERENCE ,A;.N) ., r_iC 3E 34'7 CITY OF RUTHVEN Resulting from the pavement management index map provided by ISG, the community is now focused on extending the life of existing streets with a five-year maintenance plan. REFERENCE i ,,.,, , - , -I;. CITY OF HUMBOLDT With a detailed summary and analysis of the distresses,pavement ratings,and recommendations for repairs and preventative maintenance, the City is better equipped to pnorit;ze street projects. REFERENCE COMMUNITY RESOURCE PLANNING + TRAFFIC STUDY EXPERIENCE ISG helps municipalities visualize and responsibly accomplish strategic improvement initiatives while maintaining the sustainability of vital infrastructure. Through a collaborative effort, this process allows each city to efficiently and consistently deliver quality daily services to residents, including community resource planning and traffic study solutions. Recent Related Projects include: Recent Trofc Study Experience includes: • City of Clarion CIP+ Pavement Management Plan • ALDI • New Ulm High School Cianon,!A Medina,Shakopee.and St Paul,MN New Ulm,MN • City of Leon CIP+ Pavement Management Plan • Interstate Mills • Saint Peter High School Leon,IA Randolph,MN Saint PEne:MN • City of Redwood Falls Comprehensive Plan • Chart Industries • Hoffman Road Development Redwood Falls,MN New Prague,MN Mankato,MN • City of Moville CIP+Comprehensive Plan • Menards • Go-Riteway Moville.IA Yankton,SD La Crosse,WI • TH 60 ICE • Strupp Trucking Farbault,MN Onalaska.WI R _EEVANTPROTECT EXPERIENCE SUSTAINABLE DESIGN KEY FOCAL POINTS Now more than ever,designers of the built environment are incorporating sustainable materials, Install energy-saving lighting systems, energy efficient systems, responsible water and resource use, and minimal waste construction such as occupancy sensors, LED lighting practices into their everyday work. We embrace this responsibility, and seek cost-effective systems, natural lighting design, daylight opportunities for our partners to do the same, at no additional fee. The following design harvesting, and other automated solutions are but a few of the potential ways we help clients move forward for the betterment of controls,to reduce overall consumption. our planet and incorporate such suggestions into our facilities assessment reports. Explore innovative options for potential solar and/or hybrid energy systems, LEED CERTIFIED PROJECT SNAPSHOT such as high-per-formancesolar roof 133 Energy Guidelines LEEDO Silver panels, energy-efficient windows, and geothermal heating. Increase light while also boosting focus LEEDO Gold by installing glass walls and doors using energy efficient glazing. LEEDO Certified - Minimize carbon footprint by selecting rapidly renewable and locally sourced materials, only take from the earth what it can naturally replenish. and limit industryISG serves as an expert and follows • • - •. • provide impacts from material transportation. teacher trainings in LEED credits to help them understand innovative ways they can Limit water usage and maintenance buildinguse their new •• needs by installing low flow restroom SCHOOLSMIN GREEN • fixtures. B3 DESIGNS The 1 1 Energy Standard goal is to have net zero energy • • • The SB2030 Energy Standard minimum EUI is .1' • • • ISG-designed • • surpassed the minimum requirementslower MINNESOTA —u MINNESOTA---- NATIONAL GUARD NATIONAL GUARD RENOVATION RENOVATIONn AUSTIN ARMORY ' WINONA ARMORY a D SWIFT ASSESSMENT + MINIMAL DISRUPTION The following outlines the process of evaluation ISG will use to generate a comprehensive buildings survey that the City can use for short and long-term decision making related to capital planning, deferred maintenance expenditures, and other cu rent and future facility needs. I OII N-SITE COMPREHENSIVE VISITS STAFF --Or- INTERVIEWS REPORT ONE 1 KICK-OFF At the kick-off meeting, ISG will bring examples of prioritization tables and reports to review and define priorities and data fields for the City's reports,The facilities list will be reviewed to confirm which buildings should be assessed during the project. Site visit checklists will be refined and customized to the City's needs to ensure ISG's team captures appropriate information during on-site visits and staff interviews. ISG expects to receive available plans and documents from the City during this meeting. TWO I ON-SITE VISITS ISG will conduct on-site visits to each building/site to assess the general condition of existing facilities and lifecycle of systems and equipment using the customized checklists refined during the kickoff process. ISG's team uses iPads to document conditions and send assessments immediately from the site to the office,expediting time spent reporting.A multidisciplinary approach allows our team to evaluate all systems at once, which minimizes disruption to building users. Each building system will include the following components: • System description Condition rating Additional fields noted as necessary System cibservat,ons • System recorn- mei-idarions during project kickoff 3D Scanning + Drone Capabilities ISG has made it a priority to adopt'Innovative design and imaging technology, including the following capabilities that can be used to directly enhance the services and deliverables proposed. DRONE View and sample a Using images collected during fly-overs, GG's in-house cerlified drone pilots capture aen& surlv(!, live aerial environment courtesy of ISG's drone photos and quickly model surfaces, which can provide a view of existing site conditions and, boundaries before ISG's proiect team visits the site,streamlining the process, and imaging expertise. http://c1rdPJ,//dGH9Di In addition.the technoiogy's 3D capabilities allow our design and engineering teams to accur demonstrate where specific project elements, such as utility piping, strictural additions, and s- "A corrections.are required with greater clarity, M + PROPOSED PROCESS THREE I STAFF INTERVIEWS During staff interviews, ISG will come prepared with questionnaires tailored to each stakeholder group and lead discussions to obtain detailed information on building operations. known issues, and typical maintenance schedules to learn what problems, if any, are occurring that may not be evident upon visual inspection, such as slow drains or non-functional equipment. Sample questions include; How riony employees work in this building?What type of equipment is used?Are there any comfort issues within the building?Do you know the locations o f oil drains and where they lead to?Does staff access rooftops or work on elevated platforms? FOUR I COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ISG will compile findings from visits and interviews into a comprehensive report and Excel file that includes detailed descriptions of facility conditions, noting issues and concerns and offering recommendations. The Excel file, which will be able to be sorted by year, facility, condition item, and building system, will include a 10-year detailed capital and deferred maintenance plan and the possibility of inflationary factors to be considered over the term of the plan. SMALL CLUES, O . IMPACT Sometimes,the smallest clues are the most critical. For partners at the Fort Dodgc Community School positivelyservices failures at one of the District's facilities. Thanks to . Of experience, ISCs team was able to link damagea series of indications and alert the District of the issue before any major INSPECTIONincurred. EXTERIOR FOLLOW-UP lf�TERIOR DEMO INDICATION • • THE VISUAL DIFFERENCE Highly technical information does not need to be dry and difficult to decipher. ISG will combine the talents of engineering and architectural professionals, which have collectively gained experience in each of the practices listed in the RFQ. Utilizing a number of state-of-the-art computer software programs for design calculations as well as graphic documents, ISG will incorporate fresh new graphic layout and supporting images to transform the facility assessment report into a document that is increasingly utilized by a wide variety of end users. _llo„ x 11121 98,000.� 10-14 8 O16� 264 re eoeaeewwwwoee 838, 1,350 436 914 i s PROPOSED 2018 SCHEDULE ISG will follow the schedule outlined below, checking in with City staff along the way to ensure recommendations meet City needs and goals. WEEK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 19 110 11 12 13 14 15116117 18 19120121 22 23 Due diligence, documentation + j collection, kickoff with city Process data, collaborate, etc. Initial site visit for PM, focus efforts, notes, distribute, etc. Discipline specific visits j Writing the reports, developing estimates, etc. Presenting existing conditions to staff I 0 Finalize report, write recommendations Present final deliverables KICK-OFF ON-SITE VISITS STAFF INTERVIEWS COMPREHENSIVE REPORT TOTAL HOURS 240 60� 120 ONE WO 11�20 440 SUPPORT In order to complete the buildings survey and generate a report, ISG will need the City to provide building plans and REQUIRED documents, give access to building and building systems, and provide staff availability and any scheduling information FROM CITY for interviews and visit times. + PROPOSED PROCESS, FULL-SYSTEM QUALIFICATIONS ISG + StruXture will promote high levels of collaboration between our multi-disciplinary teams of professionals, leveraging the advantage of having all design disciplines in-house. Below. and on the pages to follow, are a list of disciplines,tools, and strategies ISG + StruXture will translate throughout the course of the City buildings survey. SUSTAINABILITY CONSENSUS Assessments Planning + Feasibility Community Planning Geographic Information TestingMunicipal Planning Systems Stormwater Engineering •� z „ Resource Planning Permitting INTEGRITY AESTHETIC Civil Engineering Structural Architecture Drone Services Engineering Interior Design Electrical Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture Land Surveying Transportation Planning Engineering ,; Mechanical Engineering Visualization Water/Wastewater Municipal Engineering Engineering Steam + Power 3D Scanning MU LTI-DISC]PLI NARY ADVANTAGE PLANNING COMMUNICATION especiallyISG's full circle expertise allows us to identify potential obstacles and Having all disciplines in-house will streamline opportunities at the onset of each project - an advantage that will prove communication both internally as a project team, as •• • planning options •r well as interaction and collaboration with the City by the City moving forward. providing one point of contact. PRODUCTION SharedISG uses a platform call-• Navisworks Manage which allowsdesign ISG will assist the City with evaluationof teams to integrate data from unrelated or non-compatible programs across independent system to obtain the best value. Using disciplines, streamlining efforts from simple preliminary plan development lifiecycle cost data, a combination of good, better, and to clash-detection . • comprehensive constructiondocument • best building systemsbe balanced to achieve the deemed necessary. mostover of + PROPOSED PROCESS MAKING IT HAPPEN - TEAM SCOPE OF WORK AND COLLABORATION It's simple:facility systems and materials should be reliable for owners and occupants,durable for extended use,serviceable across facility management, and offer a maximized return on investment for the City. Below are examples on how ISG ensures these goals are achieved. ONE THREE Cross Reference City Fixtures + Equipment Capture System + Site Details Establish Continuity Provide System Specifications for Reference Develop Consistent+ Efficient Maintenance Focus on Providing Streamlined Maintenance Program + Future Planning Needs THREE FOUR COST EFFECTIVE PROACTIVE COST STREAMLINED COST ESTIMATION CONTINUITYSAVINGS ` PROCESSES roofingExample:Use some schedule7cross City,and create maintenance when suggesting door,winclowroof Example:Digitize maintenance ExomplQ:Act as City extension for acleaning tolengrihenfife. and HVAC systems. for upkeep. throughout analysis. TWO FOUR Explore Rebate Options Provide City with Prioritized Options Review+ Adjust Allow City to Plan Ahead and Develop Strategic Plan Identify Cost Savings Opportunities Maximize Return on Investment f PROPOSED P DETAILED FINDINGS + COMPREHENSIVE REPORTS ISG has provided space and facility assessment reports to a number of clients, including education client Jackson County Central Schools to government clients like Blue Earth and Montgomery Counties. in addition to the other examples outlined in this SOQ. The following provides a glimpse into the approach we take when compiling these assessments as well as what ISG would provide to the City. " - OBSERVATIONS + RECOMMENDATIONS Ir Explanation of observations of the direct space and what it means for the City Photos and graphics depicting findings in a simplified and easy to process manner E% j Recommendations on renovation versus replacement of various buildings PRIORITIES, ESTIMATED COSTS, AND CASH FLOW CHART IN E Tasks and recommendations laid out clearly as short and long-term priorities to ensure maximum ROI is achieved I] Color coding for ease of readability and coordination S] Priorities and costs broken out by year so it is clear when/where to allocate funds - Z Lrl Immediate priorities to tackle, which will include anything that poses a health or safety risk Cost estimates for renewal, repair. and code compliance issues PROPOSED PR CES TEN YEAR EXPENDITURE PLAN Irl Information that is easy to sort by year, system, and priority IVIData fields that can be incorporated into City software Current building conditions and functional inadequacies identified MAPS + GRAPHICS i �II Overlaying the data in a visual manner over existing maps of the asier to process and use facility to make it e f; Visualization of issues and concerns, incorporating custom maps, drone ae-ials, and GiS, when needed _. ...._ - E Graphics to visualize data and show tc ends EXPERTISE Architecture Engineering Environmental Planning WORK Agriculture Civic+ Culture Commercial Education Energy Food + Industrial Government Healthcare Housing Mining Public Works Sports + Recreation Exhibit "B" 2018 Hourly Rate Table M1 EmHourlployee Type y Employee Type Hourly Rate Rate Administrative 1 $ 58 IT Consultant $ 94 Administrative II $ 75 Land Surveyor 11 $ 100 Administrative III $ 83 Land Surveyor III $ 113 Administrative N $ 109 Land Surveyor N $ 149 Architect 1 $ 97 Land Surveyor Technician 1 $ 80 Architect II $ 109 Land Surveyor Technician 11 $ 92 Architect III $ 128 Land Surveyor Technician III $ 100 Architect N $ 142 Land Surveyor Technician N $ 109 Architectural Technician 1 $ 87 Landscape Architect 1 $ 103 Architectural Technician II $ 94 Landscape Architect II $ 119 Architectural Technician III $ 105 Landscape Architect III $ 133 Architectural Technician N $ 116 Landscape Architect N $ 149 Business Writer $ 109 Marketing Consultant $ 128 Civil Engineer 1 $ 108 Marketing Specialist $ 91 Civil Engineer II $ 128 Mechanical/Electrical Engineer N $ 149 Civil Engineer III $ 135 Mechanical/Electrical Engineering Technician 1 $ 87 Civil Engineer N $ 149 Mechanical/Electrical Engineering Technician If $ 103 Civil Engineering Technician 1 $ 85 Mechanical/Electrical Engineering Technician III $ 109 Civil Engineering Technician II $ 91 Mechanical/Electrical Engineering Technician N $ 113 Civil Engineering Technician III $ 96 Mechanical Engineer 1 $ 107 Civil Engineering Technician N $ 111 Mechanical Engineer II $ 121 Community Resource Planner 1 $ 99 Mechanical Engineer III $ 140 Community Resource Planner II $ 107 Mechanical Engineer N $ 152 Community Resource Planner III $ 116 Project Manager 1 $ 109 Community Resource Planner N $ 135 Project Manager II $ 119 Development 1 $ 109 Project Manager III $ 129 Development II $ 121 Project Manager N $ 140 Development III $ 135 Senior Architect $ 188 Development N $ 149 Senior Engineer $ 188 Electrical Engineer 1 $ 107 Structural Engineer 1 $ 105 Electrical Engineer II $ 113 Structural Engineer II $ 118 Electrical Engineer III $ 131 Structural Engineer III $ 140 Electrical Engineer N $ 149 Structural Engineer N $ 152 Electrical Engineering Technician 1 $ 87 Technical Writer $ 109 Electrical Engineering Technician 11 $ 99 Electrical Engineering Technician N $ 142 Expenses Environmental Scientist/Engineer 1 $ 97 Survey Grade GPS/Robotics $ 49 Environmental Scientist/Engineer II $ 109 Mapping Grade GPS $ 16 Environmental Scientist/Engineer 111 $ 124 3D Laser Scanner $ 55 Environmental Scientist/Engineer N $ 135 Drone $ 110 Environmental Specialist $ 116 All-terrain Vehicle $ 22 GIS Specialist $ 135 Traffic Counter $ 10 Graphic Designer $ 85 Information Technology $ 88 Interior Design 1 $ 100 Mileage Reimbursement at IRS standard rate Interior Design II $ 107 Outside services are billed at cost plus 10% Interior Design III $ 118 Interior Design N $ 130