HomeMy WebLinkAboutSupplemental Attachments - 1/13/2020Iti0r6 ,S4sorl
ak JOWL
RUNWAY 6-24
* RUNWAY ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED IN 1943
* LAST FAA FUNDED REHABILITATION 1981 - 2-INCH ASPHALT SURFACE OVER
FABRIC REINFORCEMENT
* FAA HAS DETERMINED THAT RUNWAY 6-24 NOT ELIGIBLE FOR AIP FUNDING
DUE TO 95% WIND COVERAGE FOR A 10.5 KNOT CROSS WIND FROM OTHER 2 RUNWAYS
* REHABILITATION OPTIONS REVIEWED:
OPTION 1. JOINT AND CRACK REPAIR $290,200**
OPTION 2. RECONSTRUCT
a. EXISTING RUNWAY (5,400 FT X 130 FT) $5,307,900
b. 95% OF SMALL AIRCRAFT (3,280 FT X 75 FT) $2,978,250
c. 100% OF SMALL AIRCRAFT (3,890 FT X 75 FT) $3,434,200
OPTION 3. MILL AND OVERLAY
a. EXISTING RUNWAY (5,400 FT X 130 FT) $3,169,800
b. 95% OF SMALL AIRCRAFT (3,280 FT X 75 FT) $1,832,900
c. 100% OF SMALL AIRCRAFT (3,890 FT X 75 FT) $2,112,300
** ASSUMES 12,300 SQUARE FEET OF CRACK REPAIR AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS.
FORT DODGE
MASON CITY
SIOUX CI,
CEDAR RAPIDS
DES MOINFS
DUBUQUE
IOWA AIRPORTS
WITH 2 RUNWAYS
KELLEY FELCHLE
From: Kendra Wyatt
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 12:42 PM
To: QUENTIN HART; KELLEY FELCHLE
Subject: FW: 5 Sullivans
From: David Dreyer <davedreyer@outlook.com>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 12:03 PM
To: Mayor <Mayor@WATERLOO-IA.ORG>; Margaret Klein <Margaret.Klein@WATERLOO-IA.ORG>; Jerome Amos Jr
<Jerome.Amos@WATERLOO-!A.ORG>; Sharon Juon <Sharon.Juon@WATERLOO-IA.ORG>; Pat Morrissey
<Pat.Morrissey@WATERLOO-IA.ORG>; Ray Feuss <Ray.Feuss@WATERLOO-IA.ORG>; jonathon.grieder@waterloo-ia.org;
Dave Boesen <Dave.Boesen@WATERLOO-IA.ORG>
Subject: 5 Sullivans
Employees of the citizens
Upon reading the agreement, all 39 pages, I have some comments for your appraisal.
First; I assume the manager is Sectra. Do they hire/fire, pay all employees at the center, pay for small maintenance, pay
utilities etc or are ail these expenses the cities as this is a city building and reads like the workers will be city employees?
At 4.3 there is verbiage about paying unused vacation which indicated city staff! So are they being paid $10,000 a month
plus bonus to just manage.
Second: What shape is the facility in now? Previously we bonded $750.000 a year for upkeep and yet the facility got in
this shape??
Third: section 3.4 indicates we will pay $48,450 in Transition expenses. I believe this means we pay them to move to
town? Right why?
Fourth: 5.1 Indicates we are not allowed to use any liscensed software owned by the manager! Ok we shouldn't need to
and None of This facilities business should be on the managers software! If our software can't do it get some that will! !f
this manager goes away we need a smooth transition to another and having all our records on our software makes that
happen.
Fifth: 5.4 No tax position inconsistent with being a service provider for the city. Exhibit A item P states once the city
makes available sufficient funds the manager will pay all taxes. We own the facility so there shouldn't be any property
taxes. Since, I assume, this venue is run "for profit" for the benefit of the "city treasury" why does the city make that
money available, why not an operating expense?
Sixth: 9.1 Funding Is this a for profit business? Why are we funding $250,000 on the first day then as time goes on we
reimburse the manage for each months purchases. Being a "for profit" to assist the city government the "profit" should
be increasing that bank account steadily!
Seventh: Exhibit D doesn't show they are to purchase Dram shop insurance! I assume at different events they will be
selling liquor "for profit". Providing Spectra doesn't acquire dram shop insurance this will put that liability on the City!
Eighth: 2020 operating budget. Reads like a Bad investment! In 6 months we lose $250,000? Are the indicated indirect
expenses for the whole year because if not that's $500,000 a year We put into Our structure for someone else to make
money! I'm convinced we could have found someone in Waterloo or Iowa to accept that deal!!
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ THIS BEFORE YOU VOTE! Seeing this to start this week I suppose your minds are made
up! Is it the Right decision this time???
Mr Mayor could/would you have some explanation on this during the meeting so the citizens can understand?
By the way I noticed some verbiage about having performance reviews, in this contract! I'm curious why it's in here but
we can't allow in city government?
Dave
1
WATERLOO
CRUISE A NEW ALTITUDE
INTER -DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO: MEMBERS, WATERLOO CITY COUNCIL
CC:
Mayor Quentin Hart
Michelle Weidner, CFO
Sheila Combs, Airport Bookkeeper
FROM: Keith Kaspari, C.M., MPA, Airport Direc
DATE: January 13, 2020
RE: 4-Year Snapshot Review of Total Air Traffic Operations (Takeoffs & Landings) from Runway 6/24.
As we have now completed CY-2019, Staff wanted to provide you all an updated 4-Year report of Air Traffic
Operations (ATO's) for Takeoffs and Landings for Runway 6/24 at Waterloo Regional Airport, with numbers
reflecting the following:
CY-2016
377 Total Takeoffs and Landings
(No Separate Monthly Reports. Just Seasonal Total - April thru November - as reported by the FAA's Air Traffic Control Tower)
CY-2017
647 Total Takeoffs and Landings
NOTE: Runway 6/24 Closed During the Months of November 2016 thru March 2017
April
40
May
50
June
50
July
50
August
50
September
113
October
108
November
164
December (Thru 12/3)
22
2790 Livingston Ln • Waterloo IA 50703 • P: 319-291-4483 • F: 319-291-4250 • www.FIyALO.com 1
CY-2018
784 Total Takeoffs and Landings
(Per Month)
January
0
February
0
March
0
(Note: Operations on Runway 6/24 From January thru March Suspended due to Frozen Water in Runway Lighting cans)
April
(From Winter Season, Reopened Runway on April 24)
10
May
82
June
(Runway 18/36 Reopened Due to Construction on June 4th)
(Duration of Closure Lasted 6-Weeks)
273
July
151
August
60
September
129
October
56
November
15
December
(Thru December 8th)
8
2
CY-2019
503 Total Takeoffs and Landings
(Per Month)
January
3
February
0
March
2
April
36
May
60
June
70
July
153
August
53
September
57
October
36
November
14
December
19
Summary:
As reflected above, the 4-Year total reflects a tally of 2,311 takeoffs and landings, in contrast with a 4-Year average
of 19,038 total Air Traffic Operations (final Air Traffic Operations for CY-2019) not available as of the date of this
correspondence.
The above total reflects an annual average of 577 takeoffs and landings, or approximately 3.03% of the overall total
of the 19,038 Air Traffic Operations at Waterloo Regional Airport.
Lastly, as you can see from the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) report (see attached), the report reflects Runway
6/24 to be in two conditions, "Poor" and "Very Poor."
As you may know, the Airport Board directed me to submit two separate CIP Requests for the FY-2020 — 2024 CIP
period, as follows:
> FY2020 — Staff submitted a request for approximately $300,000 for the resealing and repainting of the
runway.
This is, at best, a highly conservative estimate, and temporary stop -gap for a handful of years until natural
weathering will require City officials to continue on -going yet significant pavement rehabilitation, and/or
much more expensive pavement reconstruction — either of which would require GO bond issuance.
3
Example No: 1 - If this project request was approved, and if the City of Waterloo bonded for an estimated
$6,000,000 for a future Fiscal Year, the above project request alone would require approximately 5.0% of
the $6M total — again, when there are much higher priority needs for the bonded funds the City of Waterloo
would issue.
For this example, the above annual average of 577 takeoffs and landings would equate to approximately
$519.93 per landing or takeoff.
As a result of discussion by senior City Leadership via the CIP projcess, this project request was not
approved. Therefore, Staff has no intention of requesting funds for this project again in the future.
➢ FY2024 — Staff submitted a second request for approximately $1,900,000 for the complete reconstruction
of the runway — yet, with a reduced length and width, from the current -day 5,400 long x 130 wide, to
approximately 3,280 x 75.
Example No: 2 - If this project request is approved, and if the City of Waterloo would again bond for an
estimated $6,000,000 for a future Fiscal Year, this project request alone would dominate approximately
31.58% of the $6M total — again, when there are much higher priority needs for bonded funds the City of
Waterloo would issue.
For this example, the above annual average of 577 takeoffs and landings would equate to approximately
$3,292.89 per landing or takeoff.
As of the date of this correspondence, this project request for bond funds was not approved by Senior City
Leadership, and Staff has no intention of submitting this request again.
➢ Additional Note:
The Federal Aviation Administration, as of CY-2011 and the then future project for an update to the
Airport Master Plan, will no longer provide any federal funding support for this runway.
This is due to the current Primary ILS (Instrument Landing System) Runway (12/30) in addition to our
Secondary Runway (18/36), combined, that accommodates the following percentage of total air traffic
operations at the following wind speeds — both in knots and miles per hour:
WIND DATA — ALL WEATHER
CROSSWIND
SPEED IN
KNOTS PER
HOUR
CROSSWIND
SPEED IN
MILES PER
HOUR
PRIMARY
ILS
RUNWAY
12/30
SECONDARY
RUNWAY
18/36
COMBINED
RUNWAYS
12/30 & 18/36
10.5 KNOTS
12.075
89.91%
85.54%
97.52%
13.0 KNOTS
14.95
94.75%
91.65%
99.16%
16.0 KNOTS
18.40
98.43%
96.97%
99.76%
20.0 KNOTS
23.0
99.63%
99.12%
99.96%
NOTE:
The Federal Aviation Administration determined that they would no longer provide any federal funding support for
Runway 6/24 — as the City of Waterloo was a recipient of Federal Stimulus Funds via the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act (ARRA), as the City of Waterloo accepted a Stimulus Grant via the FAA for pavement
improvements for ALO's Secondary Runway 18/36 (North -South) for the Center -Section of this Runway.
4
SUMMARY:
As you can see from the numbers above, even with a minimum of crosswinds at 10.5 knots per hour, Runways
12/30 and 18/36 combined, accommodates approximately 97.52% of all potential air traffic operations.
Therefore, using a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), the expenditure of bonded dollars for either the $300,000 or
$1,900,000 does not justify the expenditure of these critical funds whereby there are much higher priority
needs for the airport department combined with other higher priority needs by other City departments.
Additionally, the above request for $1,900,000 will be the approximate match funding needed when the City
of Waterloo undergoes an extensive rehabilitation and/or reconstruction program for our Primary Runway
12/30 (Northwest -Southeast) that will be needed to begin on or around FY-2029, as determined via a Staff
Estimated Long -Range Needs Analysis (Attached).
For this future Runway 12/30 project, total cost is estimated to approach $20,000,000 — and pending what the
FAA will allow (final as reconstructed width), and type of pavement allowed (concrete or asphalt) to be
constructed.
Therefore, the City of Waterloo, as Airport Sponsor, will be required to provide a 10% match, or
approximately $2,000,000, pending final scope of work for this future critical project.
NOTE:
For this project, the Federal Aviation Administration will not issue any "Discretionary" funding assistance to
the City / Airport until Waterloo Regional Airport has a verified Financial Plan showcasing the matched local
funding is available to complete the project each year over an estimated 4-Year construction (season) project.
Discretionary Assistance by the FAA is defined as any funds allocated to the Community or Airport Sponsor
in excess of the annual entitlement total received for project assistance.
For ALO, that annual total is $1,000,000.
--- End of Memo ---
5
• • II
INN
.11 .
_.I, I
1 1
III I
MS •
R36-8
82
A
0
1111••••
LEGEND
85
SATISFACTORY
70
FAIR
POOR
0 VERY POOR
25
SERIOUS
10
FA 1 LED
0
NOT EVALUATED
SECT ION BOUNDARY
WGA-9 SECT ION DES 1 GNAT ION
PREPARED.,
AECOM
SDI SYCAMORE STREET SUITE 22.2 WATERLOO, IA. SOZOS 1.31.874,6632
SOO SM. >el STREET SUITE 301 DES MOINES, IA. 503011 141.21-79.10
PC I VALUE
711
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
WATERLOO REGIONAL AIRPORT
CITY OF WATERLOO DBA WATERLOO REGIONAL AIRPORT
Long Range Planning and Needs Analysis FY2020 - FY2040
Federal
Fiscal
Year
Project
Description
AIP Entitlement
or
Discretionary
Funding @ 90%
Local Match
of 10%
Via
(PFC's or Other)
Estimated
Total
Project
Cost
Percent Project
Completed; or,
Grant Sponsor to
Use Bond Funds
1.Obstruction
$141,750.
$15,750.
$157,500.
0%
2020
Mitigation
ALO Using i-
Years of
2. Complete
Reconstruction of
$575,302.
$63,923.
$639,225.
0%
Entitlement
G.A. Term. Apron
Funding
(Charter Aircraft Area)
3. Complete
$2,206,042.
$245,116.
$2,451,158.
0%
Sponsor
carrying over
Reconstruction of
Taxiway B —
ENT funds
(South)
from 2018 &
2019
LOCATION:
TTL: $2,923,094.
TTL: $324,789.
TTL: $3,247,883.
Between Alpha
Taxiway &
Intersection of
RWY- 18/36
Maintenance of
Runway 12/30
Application of
2021
Pavement
Preservative, Add
$634,528.
$70,503.
$705,031
N/A
Txwys Alpha (East &
Echo), Add Airfield
Pvmnt Markings
Rehabilitation of
2022
Taxiway Alpha
$1,150,987.
$127,887.
$1,278,874.
N/A
(West)
1.Airfield Pavement
$189,248.
$21,027.
$210,275.
2023
Markings
2. Airfield Pavement
$265,500.
$29,500.
$295,000.
N/A
Sweeper
TTL: $454,748.
TTL: $50,527.
TTL: $505,275.
No Project
ALO to Carry Over
2024
Balance of Funds
See Below
See Below
See Below
N/A
From 2023 & 2024
to 2025
RWY Rehabilitation
Intersection of
$2,000,000.
$200,000.
$2,200,000.
2025
RWY 18/36
Does Not Include
N/A
Est. $594,725.
(N&S of RWY 12/30)
In ENT
Funds from 2023
Airport Fire Truck
2026
Replace 1993
$1,150,000.
$115,000.
$1,265,000.
N/A
Oshkosh T-1500
Misc. Terminal
2027
Renovations
Replacement of Pax
$1,000,000.
$100,000.
$1,100,000.
N/A
Boarding Bridge,
Other Misc. Projs.
RWY 12/30 Rehab.
2028
Evaluation,
Financial Plan &
$1,000,000.
$100,000.
$1,100,000.
N/A
Proj. Design
Services
CITY OF WATERLOO DBA WATERLOO REGIONAL AIRPORT
Long Range Planning and Needs Analysis FY2020 - FY2040
2029
Runway 12/30
Pvmnt Rehab
Phase 1 of 4
ENT: $1,000,000.
DISC: $3,500,000.
$500,000.
$5,000,000
Yes.
Estimated At:
$500,000.
2030
Runway 12/30
Pvmnt Rehab
Phase 2 of 4
ENT: $1,000,000.
DISC: $3,500,000.
$500,000.
$5,000,000
Yes.
Estimated At:
$500,000.
2031
Runway 12/30
Pvmnt Rehab
Phase 3 of 4
ENT: $1,000,000.
DISC: $3,500,000.
$500,000.
$5,000,000
Yes.
Estimated At:
$500,000.
2032
Runway 12/30
Pvmnt Rehab
Phase 4 of 4
ENT: $1,000,000.
DISC: $3,500,000.
$500,000.
$5,000,000
Yes.
Estimated At:
$500,000.
2033
Replace Snow
Removal Equipment
(TBD — Fleet Eval.
ALO to Carry
Over Funds to
FY-2035
N/A
2034
Replace Snow
Removal Equipment
(TBD — Fleet Eval.
ALO to Carry
Over Funds to
FY-2035
N/A
2035
Replace Snow
Removal Equipment
(Broom - Plow - Blower)
$2,025,000.
$225,000.
$2,250,000
N/A
2036
Airport Fire Truck
Replace 2006
E-One Titan
$1,150,000.
$115,000.
$1,265,000.
N/A
2037
Pavement Rehab.
West & East
General Aviation
Apron, Taxilanes
HNGR 4 and
T-HNGR Areas
A-B-C
$1,000,000.
$100,000.
$1,100,000.
Does Not Include
$1,050,000 in ENT
from 2035
N/A
2038
Sponsor to Carry
Over Funds to 2040
N/A
2039
Sponsor to Carry
Over Funds 2040
N/A
2040
New Hangar
Development
Site Prep, Design
Services and
Construction
$3,000,000.
$300,000.
$3,300,000.
N/A
ESTIMATED
PROJECT
TOTALS
$35,488,357.
$3,828,706.
$39,911,788.
N/A
Shared Junk/ACIP-Airport Capital Imp Program — KK — ALO — Long Range Plan
RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS
Runway Design Category
Length (ft.)
Small Airplanes - Approach Speed Less Than 30 Knots
Small Airplanes - Approach Speed Less Than 50 Knots
75% Small Airplanes With Less Than 10 Seats
95% Small Airplanes With Less Than 10 Seats
100% Small Airplanes With Less Than 10 Seats
Small Airplanes With 10 or More Seats
Large Airplanes - 75% of Fleet at 60% Useful Load
Large Airplanes - 75% of Fleet at 90% Useful Load
Large Airplanes - 100% of Fleet at 60% Useful Load
Large Airplanes - 100% of Fleet at 60% Useful Load
Critical Design Aircraft (Maximum Take -Off Weight)
ERJ 140/145
MD-87
B737-800
330
870
2,750
3,280
3,890
4,350
5,460
7,000
5,510
8,290
6,791
8,430
8,400
Based on FAA Advisory Circular 150/5325-4A and Manufacturer's Data.
Option
Runway Length by Width
Estimated Construction Cost
Reconstruct Current Configuration
5,400' by 130'
$5,307,900
95% Small Aircraft < 10 Seats
(Includes Pavement Removal)
3,280' by 75'
$2,978,250
95% Small Aircraft < 10 Seats
3,280' by 75'
$2,514,020
100% Small Aircraft < 10 Seats
(Includes Pavement Removal)
3,890' by 75'
$3,434,200
100% Small Aircraft < 10 Seats
3,890' by 75'
$2,949,300
,63
SCALE
603,
AECOM
60159CA693RESTREEI S111TE113 WATERLOO.19. 60103 1.610-232-053,
6003.W.101SIREET SOITE301 0ES131OINE5,13. 60309 1-616013.1610
RECONSTRUCT CURRENT CONFIGURATION
5,400 FT BY 130 FT
RECONSTRUCT RUNWAY 6-24
WATERLOO REGIONAL AIRPORT
Reconstruct Runway 6-24
Existing Width and Length (5,400 by 130)
Description
Unit
Estimated Quantity
Estimated Unit Price
Total Estimate
Mobilization and Safety
LS
1
$ 630,500.00
$ 630,500.00
Pavement Removal
SYD
78,000
$ 5.30
$ 413,400.00
Excavation
CYD
13,000
$ 5.50
$ 71,500.00
Base Course
CYD
13,000
$ 30.00
$ 390,000.00
Bituminous Pavement
Ton
20,000
$ 80.00
$ 1,600,000.00
Pavement Grooving
SYD
78,000
$ 6.00
$ 468,000.00
Pavement Marking
LS
1
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
Runway Edge Lights
EA
70
$ 800.00
$ 56,000.00
Lighting Cable & Conduit
LFT
18,000
$ 8.00
$ 144,000.00
Contin@ency(15%)
LS
1
$ 567,500.00
$ 567,500.00
Design/Construction Administration
LS
1
$ 957,000.00
$ 957,000.00
Total Construction Estimate $ 5,307,900.00
RUNWAY 6-24
3280' 6Y 75
nREPAREunY.
AECOM
501 SYCAMORE STREET SOITE222 WATERLOO. LA 50703 1.319.2326531
SOB SAY. 7.51REET =TEEM DES MORES... 50300 1515-323.7510
95% OF SMALL AIRCRAFT < 10 SEATS
3,280 FT BY 75 FT
RECONSTRUCT RUNWAY 6-24
WATERLOO REGIONAL AIRPORT
Reconstruct Runway 6-24
95% of Small Aircraft Less than 10 Seats
3280 b., 75 - With Pavement Removal Outside of Runway
Description
Unit
Estimated Quantity
Estimated Unit Price
Total Estimate
Mobilization and Safety
LS
1
$ 353,700.00
$ 353,700.00
Pavement Removal
SYD
84,500
$ 5.30
$ 447,850.00
Excavation
CYD
4,600
$ 5.50
$ 25,300.00
Backfill Removal Areas Beyond
Pavement
CYD
6,500
$ 10.00
$ 65,000.00
Base Course
CYD
4,600
$ 30.00
$ 138,000.00
Bitumirous Pavement
Ton
7,000
$ 80.00
$ 560,000.00
Pavement Grooving
SYD
27,400
$ 6.00
$ 164,400.00
Paveme nt Marking
SFT
1
$ 9,000.00
$ 9,000.00
Runway Edge Lights
EA
50
$ 800.00
$ 40,000.00
Lighting Cable & Conduit
LFT
10,000
$ 8.00
$ 80,000.00
Relocate VASI
LS
1
$ 100,000.00
$ 100,000.00
Topsoiling
CYD
6,500
$ 15.00
$ 97,500.00
Seeding and Mulching
ACRE
15
$ 2,800.00
$ 42,000.00
Contingency (15%)
LS
1
$ 318,500.00
$ 318,500.00
Design/:onstruction Administration
LS
1
$ 537,000.00
$ 537,000.00
Total Construction Estimate
$ 2,978,250.00
Reconstruct Runway 6-24
95% of Small Aircraft Less than 10 Seats
3280 by 75 without Pavement Removal Outside of Runway
Description
Unit
Estimated Quantity
Estimated Unit Price
Total Estimate
Mobilization and Safety
LS
1
$ 298,600.00
$ 298,600.00
Pavement Removal
SYD
27,400
$ 5.30
$ 145,220.00
Excavation
CYD
4,600
$ 5.50
$ 25,300.00
Backfill itemoval Areas Beyond
Paveme it
CYD
-
$ 10.00
$ -
Base Course
CYD
4,600
$ 30.00
$ 138,000.00
Bituminous Pavement
Ton
7,000
$ 80.00
$ 560,000.00
Pavement Grooving
SYD
27,400
$ 6.00
$ 164,400.00
Pavement Marking
SFT
1
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
Runway Edge Lights
EA
50
$ 800.00
$ 40,000.00
Lighting Cable & Conduit
LFT
10,000
$ 30.00
$ 300,000.00
Relocate VAST
LS
1
$ 100,000.00
$ 100,000.00
Topsoiling
CYD
-.
$ 15.00
$ -
Seeding and Mulching
ACRE
-
$ 2,800.00
$ -
Continge ncy (15%)
LS
1
$ 269,000.00
$ 269,000.00
Design/Construction Administration
LS
1
$ 453,500.00
$ 453,500.00
Total Construction Estimate
$ 2,514,020.00
1.7
6DA�E
RREIi1NE11DV.
1=COM
SO 1 SYCAMORE STREET SUITE= WATERLOO.IM1 50103 1319.332ssv
5006.IN 101 STREET SUITE.1 DES MOINES. IA. 50309 1.51531.1910
100% OF SMALL AIRCRAFT < 10 SEATS
3,890 FT BY 75 FT
RECONSTRUCT RUNWAY 6-24
WATERLOO REGIONAL AIRPORT
Reconstruct Runway 6-24
100% cf Small Aircraft Less than 10 Seats
3280 b / 75 without Pavement Removal Outside of Runway
Description
Unit
Estimated Quantity
Estimated Unit Price
Total Estimate
Mobilization and Safety
LS
1
$ 408,000.00
$ 408,000.00
Pavement Removal
SYD
84,500
$ 5.30
$ 447,850.00
Excavation
CYD
5,500
$ 5.50
$ 30,250.00
Backfill Removal Areas Beyond
Pavement
CYD
16,500
$ 10.00
$ 165,000.00
Base Course
CYD
5,500
$ 30.00
$ 165,000.00
Bitumir ous Pavement
Ton
8,300
$ 80.00
$ 664,000.00
Pavement Grooving
SYD
32,500
$ 6.00
$ 195,000.00
Pavement Marking
SFT
1
$ 11,000.00
$ 11,000.00
Runway Edge Lights
EA
56
$ 800,00
$ 44,800.00
Lighting Cable & Conduit
LFT
12,000
$ 8.00
$ 96,000.00
Relocate VASI
LS
1
$ 100,000.00
$ 100,000.00
Topsoiling
CYD
6,000
$ 15.00
$ 90,000.00
Seeding and Mulching
ACRE
11
$ 2,800.00
$ 30,800.00
Contingency (15%)
LS
1
$ 367,000.00
$ 367,000.00
Design/Construction Administration
LS
1
$ 619,500.00
$ 619,500.00
Total Construction Estimate $ 3,434,200.00
Reconstruct Runway 6-24
100% of Small Aircraft Less than 10 Seats
3890 by 75 - Without Pavement Removal Outside of Runway
Description
Unit
Estimated Quantity
Estimated Unit Price
Total Estimate
Mobilization and Safety
LS
1
$ 350,500.00
$ 350,500.00
Pavement Removal
SYD
32,500
$ 5.30
$ 172,250.00
Excavation
CYD
5,500
$ 5.50
$ 30,250.00
Backfill Removal Areas Beyond
Paveme it
CYD
-
$ 10.00
$ -
Base Coarse
CYD
5,500
$ 30.00
$ 165,000.00
Bituminous Pavement
Ton
8,300
$ 80.00
$ 664,000.00
Paveme -it Grooving
SYD
32,500
$ 6.00
$ 195,000.00
Pavement Marking
SFT
1
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
Runway Edge Lights
EA
56
$ 800.00
$ 44,800.00
Lighting Cable & Conduit
LFT
12,000
$ 30.00
$ 360,000.00
Relocate VASI
LS
1
$ 100,000.00
$ 100,000.00
Topsoiling
CYD
-
$ 15.00
$ -
Seeding and Mulching
ACRE
-
$ 2,800.00
$ -
Contingency (15%)
LS
1
$ 315,500.00
$ 315,500.00
Design/C:onstruction Administration
LS
1
$ 532,000.00
$ 532,000.00
Total Construction Estimate $ 2,949,300.00
• ":"
•
•
X '-"A--;>;4"i'?•-1.-tfir7..
too y+t..
„.,„; • ..)• • r •
/ 1
nelft AI;
adhPli
an aPIMIMrit+rr" r.
. IIIIINIIIIMIP 411140R.,�
._111.110011 _____ a
sR� a --
Ainingla •
�IEMINIMENLtwo* u.l
AIR WilliMIER.WI..a
lllllllll i 1111I I I IIIIN11111\1\\\l�\\\\\\\\`\\\\
••••••1.1.11./1.111......••••=01101RMOOMIOM11111•••••••••••••••..1.*•0011011.01.1.10111M11.11110MONOMIeram.....1601110111011777.....
16 It \ \ \ 1. \ ♦`\ C" V 50"IV ►GQi
2015-04-05 19.13.38
2015-04-05 19.09.15
2015-04-05 19,08.09
2015-04-05 19.06.58
2015-04-0519.03.54
2015-04-05 19 00.41
2015-04-05 18.59.04
2015-04-05 19.10.34
2015-04-05 19.09.07
2015-04-05 19.08.04
2015-04-05 19.05.02
2015-04-05 19.03.37
2015-04-05 19.00.37
2015-04-05 19.10.23
2015-04-05 19.08.40
2015-04-05 19.07.40
2015-04-05 19.04.52
2015-04-05 19.03.28
2015-04-05 18.59.56
2015-04-05 19.10.13
2015-04-05 19.08.32
2015-04-05 19.07.32
2015-04-05 19.04.35
2015-04-05 19.01.01
2015-04-05 18.59.40
2015-04-05 19 09.46
2015-04-05 19.08.14
2015-04-05 19.07,07
2015-04-05 19.04.05
2015-04-05 19.00.54
2015-04-05 18.59.17
2015-04-05 18.58.57
2015-04-05 18.58.20
2015-04-05 18.58.14
2015-04-05 18.58.08
2015-04-05 13.57.39
2015-04-05 1 £1.56.15
2015-04-05 18.55.13
2015-04-05 18.51.05
2015-04-05 18 48.55
2015-04-05 18.44.43
2015-04-05 18.13.46
2015-04-05 18.57.32
2015-04-05 18.56.11 HDR
2015-04-05 18.54.57
2015-04-05 18.51.01
2015-04-05 18.48.48
2015-04-05 18.44.38
2015-04-05 18.57.03
2015-04-05 18.56.10
2015-04-05 18.54.21
2015-04-05 18.49.42
2015-04-05 18.45.25
2015-04-05 18.44.29
2015-04-05 18.56.58
2015-04-05 18.55.45
2015-04-05 18.54.14
2015-04-05 18.49.36
2015-04-05 18.45.20 HDR
2015-04-05 18.44.09
2015-04-05 18.56.20
2015-04-05 18.55.26
2015-04-05 18.51.06 HDR
2015-04-05 18.48.59
2015-04-05 18.45.20
2015-04-05 18.43.57
2015-04-05 18.43.31
2015-04-05 18.43.21
2015-04-05 18.42.55
2015-04-05 18.42.43
2015-04-05 13.41.16
2015-04-05 18.39.03
2015-04-05 18.37.57
2015-04-05 18.33.41
2015-04-05 18.30.52
2015-04-05 18.28.18
2015-04-05 18.41.02
2015-04-05 18.38.53
2015-04-05 18.37.47
2015-04-05 18.32.57
2015-04-05 18.30.38
2015-04-05 18.28.11
2015-04-05 18.40.37
2015-04-05 18.38.42
2015-04-05 18.35.50
2015-04-05 18.31.32
2015-04-05 18.30.24
2015-04-05 18.28.05
2015-04-05 18.40.24
2015-04-05 18.38.17
2015-04-05 18.34.13
2015-04-05 18.31.17
2015-04-05 18.30.17
2015-04-05 18.27.59 HDR
2015-04-05 18.39.16
2015-04-05 18.38.07
2015-04-05 18.34.07
2015-04-05 18.31.04
2015-04-05 18.28.39
2015-04-05 18.27.59
2015-04-05 18.26.14
2015-04-05 18.26.06
2015-04-05 18.25.53
2015-04-05 18.25.40
2015-04-05 18.25.34
2015-04-05 13.24.28
2015-04-05 1 b.20.51
2015-04-05 18.18.04
2015-04-05 18 16.53
2015-04-05 18.15.09
2015-04-05 18.12.38
2015-04-05 18.24.16
2015-04-05 18.20.41
2015-04-05 18.17.45
2015-04-05 18.16.45
2015-04-05 18.14.58
2015-04-05 18.12.32
2015-04-05 18.24.05
2015-04-05 18.19.21
2015-04-05 18.17.38
2015-04-05 18.16.40
2015-04-05 18.13.54
2015-04-05 18.12.16
2015-04-05 18.23.53
2015-04-05 18.18.44
2015-04-05 18.17.18
2015-04-05 18.16.10
2015-04-05 18.12.08
2015-04-05 18.23.44
2015-04-05 18.18.13
2015-04-05 18.17.12
2015-04-05 18.15.54
2015-04-05 18.13.12
2015-04-05 18.11.50
2015-04-05 18.11.38
2015-04-05 18.10.47
2015-04-05 18.09.23
2015-04-05 18.08.36
2015-04-05 18.08.30
2015-04-05 18.08.18
2015-04-05 18.07.09
2015-04-05 18.05.56
2015-04-05 18.35.18
2015-04-05 18.03.48
2015-04-05 18.01.52
2015-04-05 18.07.57
2015-04-05 18.06.57
2015-04-05 18.05.41 HDR
2015-04-05 18.04.47
2015-04-05 18.03.28
2015-04-05 18.01.32
2015-04-05 18.07.38
2015-04-05 18.06.46
2015-04-05 18.05.40
2015-04-05 18.04.41
2015-04-05 18.03.15
2015-04-05 18.01.28
2015-04-05 18.07.24
2015-04-05 18.06.30
2015-04-05 18.05.32
2015-04-05 18.04.20
2015-04-05 18.02.50
2015-04-05 18.01.20
2015-04-05 18.07.09 HDR
2015-04-05 18.06.10
2015-04-05 18.05.25
2015-04-05 18.04.07
2015-04-05 18.02.23
2015-04-05 18.00.37
2015-04-05 18.00.28
EXPERIENCE
waterloo
M
PHONE (319) 233-8350
TOIL FREE (800) 728-8431
FAX (319) 233-2733
ex perienc ewate rloo.com
TO: City Council
FROM: Tavis Hall
DATE: January 13, 2020
RE: Spectra Venue Management Agreement
Experience Waterloo is generally in favor of the agreement struck between the City of Waterloo and Spectra Venue
Management for the purposes of management of the Five Sullivan Brothers Convention Center.
On Friday, January 9ih, we met with City leadership to address specific questions that our organization had regarding this
agreement. At that meeting, there was a request for $100,000 for FY20 and $100,000 for FY21 toward Convention Center
Management, with additional dollars likely being necessary in years beyond FY21. Ultimately, we are willing to make that
investment into management of this building, as it aligns with our strategic goals organizationally and in the interest of
maintaining a strong working relationship with the City of Waterloo, as we all strive to make Waterloo a great place to
live, work, play and stay. While we do not take that level of investment lightly, we recognize the importance of the
building on the overall tourism industry in Waterloo. It is our hope that the Convention Center once again becomes a
major contributor to Waterloo's tourism product.
Overall, tourism in the Cedar Valley is a major economic driver. Last year, tourism and travel generated $386,000,000 in
economic impact according to the Iowa Economic Development Authority and the US Travel Association. The tourism
industry creates 3,000 jobs in the Cedar Valley and generate $63,000,000 in payroll. In total, the Cedar Valley welcomes
810,000 hotel guests per year with an average daily spend of $476 per stay. Those dollars keep our favorite restaurants
and small businesses thriving, ultimately helping create an even greater sense of place for residents and visitors alike.
The Convention Center has an ability to help drive even larger numbers of visitors to the area, which is the focus of our
organization. With professional management of the facility, our hope is that meeting & event planners will be inspired to
consider Waterloo as the host of their next meeting, conference or event. With the attached hotel receiving large-scale
investment and the Convention Center seeing reinvestment per the development agreement on the hotel, the time for
professional management of the Convention Center is now.
As stated before, we are supportive of the venue management concept as proposed and excited to have such an
experienced partner in Spectra operating the Convention Center. We look forward to a mutually beneficial relationship
with Spectra as well as a continued strong relationship with the City of Waterloo.
Sincerely,
Tavis Hall
Executive Director, Experience Waterloo