HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/31/2006 C,G(,C
J
MINUTES OF THE WATERLOO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING HELD ON
January 31, 2006, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
Chairperson Moine called the regular monthly meeting of the Waterloo Board of
Adjustment to order on Tuesday,January 31,2006, at 4:00 p.m. Board members in
attendance were: Moine,St.John and Mixdorf. Members not present were Holdiman and
Anfinson. Staff in attendance was Aric Schroeder and Shane Graham. There was 1 person
from the public in attendance.
I. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting on December 27, 2005.
Hearing no additions or corrections,Moine approved the minutes as submitted.
II. Approval of the agenda for Jann 9 31 7flO
It was moved by Mixdorf, seconded by St. John, to approve the agenda as submitted. Motion
carried unanimously.
III. Decision I+ems
1. Election of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for the 2006 calendar year.
It was moved by Mixdorf, seconded by St. John, to nominate Moine as chairperson and
Holdiman as vice chairperson for the 2006 calendar year.Motion carried unanimously.
2. Request by Ed and Wanda Hedges at 66n F. Rig Rnrk Rd for a variance to the
maximum square foot size limit for accessory structures to allow for the construction
of a 32'x45' (1,440sf) detached garage,with total square footage of accessory
structures of 2,304 square feet,504 square feet more than the maximum allowed, and
a variance to the accessory structure metal siding requirement to allow for the
construction of that structure with vertical metal siding.
Schroeder gave the staff report,noting that the property is located at 660 E Big Rock Rd,3/4 mile
east of Highway 63 and 2 mile west of the City Limits. The property in question and all
surrounding properties are zoned "A-1" Agricultural District and have been zoned as such
since adoption of the Zoning Ordinance No. 2479 in 1969. Schroeder noted that the request
would not appear to have a negative impact on the neighborhood, as the property is located in
an agricultural setting surrounded by farm ground,including one farm building setup
(including a hog confinement building) across the street. Therefore the size and metal siding of
the proposed building would appear to be compatible to the surrounding uses. Schroeder noted
that the applicants are proposing to build the 1,440 SF building in addition to the existing 864 SF
garage to store personal property. The Zoning Ordinance restricts the total detached accessory
structures to 6% of the lot size up to a maximum of 1,800 SF. 6% of the total lot area would be
7,448 SF,however the Ordinance still limits the maximum at 1,800 SF. The area of the existing
and proposed garage would be 2,304 SF, 504 SF over the maximum. The applicants are also
proposing that the structure utilize vertical metal siding. The Zoning Ordinance prohibits metal
siding except for horizontal aluminum/steel siding common on many residential structures.
Schroeder noted that in reviewing past requests for variances to exceed the accessory building
limit and to allow vertical metal siding, there have been similar requests approved when the
proposed structures were less than 6% of the total lot and also typically when the property was
not in the middle of a residential area, and on the fringe of the community adjacent to or within
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
January 31,2006 Minutes
architect to provide that information and may have more information available at the meeting,
but preliminary are planning on providing an assembly area that will be rated for 243 seats.
At 1 parking space per 4 seats, this would create 61 off-street parking spaces required by the
Ordinance. Based on the size and dimensions of the existing off-street parking area, it would
appear that this area would be able to accommodate a maximum of 18 parking spaces while
still providing necessary area for turning movements necessary to enter and exit the parking
area. The Ordinance indicates that the number of spaces required must be provided "off-
street on the same lot as the principal permitted use". However, as part of a variance,the
Board may be able to take into consideration abutting on-street parking spaces, such as the
approximately 15 spaces abutting the building within the 8th Street right-of-way. This
provides for a total of 33 spaces that would be available for the use. However,because
parking spaces within a street right-of-way are controlled by the City of Waterloo, there is no
guarantee that the spaces will always be available, as potential road or utility improvements
could require the removal of such spaces, although there are no current plans that would
require the loss of parking. In addition to the uniqueness of the available on-street parking
spaces, the applicants are indicating that the youth ministry program currently has
approximately 80 to 90 regular members, and that the do not anticipate that they would ever
exceed 150 members. In addition, the applicants are indicating that the age of members ranges
from 12 to 20,with an emphasis on the younger ages and the older ages typically being
mentors, and have suggested that for such a group (most of which under driving age) that the
required 1 space per 4 persons is excessive and suggest that 1 space per 8 persons would
provide ample parking. Based on the expected maximum membership of 150, using the 1
space per 8 persons would require 19 parking spaces. Based on the expected occupancy rating
of the Building Code of 243,using the 1 space per 8 persons would require 31 parking spaces.
The applicants are requesting approval of the variance to require a minimum of 20 parking
spaces be provided, including allowing the existing on-street parking spaces abutting the
building to be counted towards the 20 spaces required subject to a condition that if said on-
street parking spaces are made no longer available for any reason, that the applicants will
provide a minimum of 20 off-street parking spaces (which would likely require additional
paving of the grassy area along Commercial Street). Staff would recommend that the number
of spaces currently available (33) be maintained. Schroeder noted that staff recommends that
the variance to the number of parking stalls required be approved,as the request would not
appear to have a negative impact on the neighborhood or traffic conditions in the area, the
request is in conformance with the Future Land Use Map and the general intent of the
Comprehensive Plan, the request is unique in that it is reusing a fairly large and open building
space for a use that is primarily attended by non-driving age individuals, and subject to the
following conditions: That the variance to the number of parking spaces required is only
approved for the use of the premises as a youth ministry, and that a minimum of 33 parking
spaces be provided for the use, including allowing the existing on-street parking spaces
abutting the building to be counted towards the 33 spaces required subject to a condition that
if said on-street parking spaces are made no longer available for any reason, that the
applicants will provide a minimum of 33 off-street parking spaces, approved and constructed
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance.
The representative for the church spoke on the request,noting that he thinks 33 parking stall
was excessive given the use of the building and recommended that they be required to have
only 20 stalls. There was a long discussion about how many parking stalls should be required.
Moine commented that if 33 parking stalls are currently present, that they should be
maintained.
3