HomeMy WebLinkAboutDNR - Intended Use Plan (CIPP PH IVB SRF) - 5.15.23Letter of Transmittal
TO: Jesse Gaherty
Collections System/Project Director
City of Waterloo WMS
3505 Easton Avenue
Waterloo, IA 50702
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
❑x Attached
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Copy of Letter
❑ Prints
❑ Change Order
A=GOM
DATE: May 1, 2023
JOB ID NO. 60682318
ATTENTION:
RE: Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
Waterloo, Iowa
❑ Under Separate Cover Via
❑ Plans
❑ Samples
the Following Items:
❑ Specifications
Copies
Date
No.
Description
1
IUP Application
1
Construction Permit Schedule A
1
SRF Environmental Review Checklist
1
Socioeconomic Assessment Worksheet
1
Facility Plan
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
❑ For Approval
❑x For Your Use
❑ As Requested
❑ For Review and Comment
❑ For Bids Due
20
❑ Approved as Submitted
❑ Approved as Noted
❑ Returned for Corrections
❑ Resubmit Copies for Approval
❑ Submit Copies for Distribution
❑ Return Corrected Prints
❑ Prints Returned After Loan to Us
REMARKS: Mr. Gaherty --- Attached are the IDNR documents for the CIPP PH IVB project to be put on the City Council Agenda.
If approved, please have Mayor Hart sign the last page of the IUP and return it to me. I need to submit to IDNR by 06/01/2023.
If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 319-296-6878. Thank you.
COPY TO: SIGNED:
501 Sycamore Street, Suite 222
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
P.O. Box 1497 • Waterloo, Iowa 50704-1497
Christopher G Oelkers, PE
• (319) 232-6531
• Fax: (319) 232-0271
CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND
INTENDED USE PLAN (IUP) APPLICATION
The application for inclusion on the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) IUP can be submitted
only when the wastewater project is at the right stage of the construction permitting process. This
numbered list outlines the requirements of the permitting process that must be met prior to submitting
an IUP application. It also identifies the materials and information needed to complete the IUP
application. Please follow the preliminary steps and proceeding instructions to make sure your
application is complete before submitting it.
PRELIMINARY STEPS FOR IUP APPLICATION SUBMISSION
Enter the following information here:
1. Applicant Name: City of Waterloo, Iowa
SRF
STATE
REVOLVING FUND
2. DNR Number (e.g. W2014-#### or 52014-####): W2023-0164A
3. DNR Project Manager Name: Larry Bryant, PE
4. Project Name/Identification: CIPP Phase IVB
5. Project Initiation Meeting Held (enter meeting date):
01/30/2023
6. Flows and Loads Concurrence by DNR (enter date or N/A): NA
a. If N/A, state reason:
7. Wasteload Allocation Completed (enter date or N/A): NA
8. Antidegradation Alternatives Analysis Approved by DNR (enter date or N/A): NA
9. Facility Plan Submitted with IUP Application (choose Yes or Previously Submitted): ❑X Yes n Previously Submitted
a. If previously submitted, enter date submitted:
b. If previously submitted, enter certification date:
10. Iowa Construction Permit Application Schedule A Submitted with IUP Application
(enter Yes or No; previously submitted):
11. Iowa Construction Permit Application Schedule F and G submitted with IUP
Application (choose Yes, N/A, or Previously Submitted):
Ensure that your IUP application includes the following (all boxes must be checked)
12. Socioeconomic Assessment Worksheet attachment included with application
13. IUP Application signed
14. UEI Number included
15. Property Assurance Form signed and dated
16. SRF Environmental Review Checklist and Attachment included with application
❑X Yes
❑ Yes
Submission Instructions:
n D• o not submit a single file that includes all requested documents.
n E• ach requested document must be submitted as an individual, separate document.
n E• ach document must be titled using the following naming convention:
❑ Previously Submitted
❑X N/A ❑ Previously
Submitted
Document Name
Required Name/Title Structure
Example
IUP Application
ApplicantName_IUPApplication
Waterloo_IUPApplication
Environmental Review Checklist
ApplicantName_ERChecklist
Waterloo_ERChecklist
01/2023 cmc
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-1320
Document Name
Required Name/Title Structure
Example
Socioeconomic Assessment
Worksheet
ApplicantName_SAWorksheet
—
Waterloo SAWorksheet
—
Facility Plan
ApplicantName_FacilityPlan
Waterloo_FacilityPlan
Iowa Construction Permit Application
Schedules A, F and G
ApplicantName_ScheduleX
Waterloo_ScheduleA
Waterloo_ScheduleF
Waterloo_ScheduleG
Environmental Review Supporting
Materials
ApplicantName_ERSupplement_No._
*number each additional document sequentially
Waterloo_ERSupplement_No.1
*Your application will not be considered complete or acceptable if items 1 through 16 have not been completed
and/or included. See instructions below for additional guidance.
01/2023 cmc
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-1320
CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND
INTENDED USE PLAN (IUP) APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
ITEMS 1— 11: Wastewater Construction Permitting
The Clean Water SRF Intended Use Plan Application will only be accepted when Items 1 through 11 have
been completed through the Wastewater Construction Permitting Process of the DNR Wastewater
Engineering Section. Please refer to the Wastewater Permitting Process Manual for detailed information
on these steps.
SRF
STATE
REVOLVING FUND
1. Applicant Name: Enter the name of the applicant who is requesting SRF funding.
2. DNR Number (e.g. W2014-#### or S2014-####): All wastewater construction projects are assigned unique
numbers for tracking by DNR. A number beginning with W and the fiscal year indicates a Work Record. A
number beginning with S and the fiscal year indicates a Project.
3. DNR Project Manager Name: A project manager from the DNR Wastewater Engineering Section is assigned to
each project.
4. Project Name/Identification: A brief title/description of the project from Design Schedule A, General
Information. The project description must fall under the project scope established at the project initiation
meeting. An accurate description is necessary because multiple construction contracts may have the same
project numbers.
5. Project Initiation Meeting Held (date): A project initiation meeting must be held with the DNR, Owner,
Consulting engineer (licensed professional engineer), and other parties.
6. Flows and Loads Concurrence by DNR (date): If flows and loadings will change due to the project, the DNR
Project Manager must concur with the proposed design flows and loadings prior to preparing the Facility Plan. If
answer is n/a, state the reason. Example: previously approved flows and loadings remain unchanged.
7. Wasteload Allocation Completed (WLA) (date): If a Wasteload Allocation is required for the project, it must be
must be completed by the DNR and received by the Owner before preparing the Facility Plan. Enter "N/A" if
WLA is not required for the project.
8. Antidegradation Alternatives Analysis (AAA) Approved by DNR (date): If an antidegradation alternatives analysis
is required for the project, it must be approved by the DNR Project Manager before the Owner prepares the
Facility Plan. Enter date of DNR approval of the AAA. If a Facility Plan is submitted prior to DNR approval of
Antidegradation Alternatives Analysis, it will not be accepted for review. Enter "N/A' if AAA is not required for
the project.
9. Facility Plan Submitted with IUP Application: After completing all applicable planning steps as discussed above,
the Facility Plan may be submitted to DNR. Answer "Yes" if a Facility Plan is submitted along with the IUP
application:
a. If a Facility Plan was previously submitted, enter the date submitted.
b. If the Facility Plan was previously submitted, enter the date of certification by a licensed professional
engineer.
Facility Plan submissions shall follow Chapter 11 of the Iowa Wastewater Facilities Design Standards. All
engineering submittals shall follow all applicable law and rule related to submitting engineering documents by
licensed professional engineers. Electronic submittals are acceptable as long as they are in compliance with all
applicable law, including but not limited to Iowa Code 542B and Iowa Administrative Code 193C.
10. Iowa Construction Permit Application Schedule A: Design Schedule A must be certified by both the Owner and
the Consulting Engineer (licensed professional engineer). It is required and must be submitted for all wastewater
projects. Schedule A must indicate that Clean Water SRF financing will be requested to be considered as part of
this IUP application.
11. Schedules F and G (if needed for the project): Schedule G provides Wastewater Treatment Plant project design
information and Schedule F provides site information for treatment process site selection. Enter "N/A" if these
schedules are not needed for the project.
01/2023 cmc
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-1320
Items 12- 16: Additional SRF Requirements for a Complete Application:
12. Socioeconomic Assessment Worksheet must be completed and included as an attachment with the IUP
application. The worksheet can be found on the lowaSRF.com website, SRF Resources page under General
Information: https://www.iowasrf.com/about srf/srf-resources/
13. IUP Application Signed: The Intended Use Plan application must be signed by the Applicant's authorized
representative. Printed or electronic signatures are accepted.
14. UEI Number Included: The U.S. Federal Government has transitioned from using a Dun and Bradstreet Number
(DUNS) to using a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). Entity refers to prime contractors, organizations or individuals
applying for assistance awards, those receiving loans, sole proprietors, corporations, partnerships, and any
Federal Government agencies desiring to do business with the government.
You can register your entity to obtain a Unique Entity ID here: https://sam.gov/content/entity-registration
15. Property Assurance Form Signed: This form is required to be signed and dated regardless of whether or not the
Applicant currently intends to purchase land using SRF funds.
16. SRF Environmental Review Checklist and Attachments Completed and Submitted: The ER checklist outlines the
information needed to start the SRF ER Services. The environmental review checklist can be obtained here:
https://www.iowasrf.com/about srf/srf-resources/
Complete the requested information in the following sections to the best of your ability. Please print or type the
information on the form. If a particular item does not apply to your system, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." Attach
supporting documentation as needed. Keep a copy of the completed application for your records and submit the signed
form and supporting documents to the following e-mail address: srf-iup@dnr.iowa.gov
01/2023 cmc
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-1320
CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND
INTENDED USE PLAN (IUP) APPLICATION FORM
This form may be used to apply for inclusion on the project priority list (PPL) of the Clean Water SRF IUP after or
concurrent to submitting the Facility Plan to DNR for approval. IUPs are developed on an annual basis with quarterly
updates as needed.
*This form is not an application for a loan. SRF loan application materials may be obtained at www.lowaSRF.com. The loan
application should not be completed until after bids are received. Extended term financing (up to 30 years) is available to all
projects based on the weighted average useful life of the project components.
See Exhibit 14 - CWSRF Extended Term Worksheet
*Applicants will be required to comply with all applicable State and Federal requirements in order to be eligible to receive SRF
funding. A list of these requirements can be found at: https://www.iowasrf.com/about srf/srf-resources/
Section 1: Applicant and Other Project Contacts
Applicant Name: City of Waterloo
Applicant Address: 715 Mulberry Street
City: Waterloo State: Iowa
Authorized Representative:
Quentin Hart
Zip: 50702
Telephone Number: 319-291-4301
Signature:
QuercWuz 9 rt
SIGNED
E-mail: mayor@waterloo-ia.org
UEI Number: QFUUVJ8QTDN3
Population Served by System: 49,000
NPDES Number: 0790001
Title: Mayor
Consulting Engineer Firm: AECOM
Population Served by Project: 2000
Contact Person: Chris Oelkers
Telephone Number: 319-232-6531
Bond Counsel Firm: Ahlers Cooney
E-mail: christopher.oelkers@aecom.com
Contact Person: Kristin Billingsley Cooper
Telephone Number: 515-246-0330
*Municipal Advisor Firm: Speer Financial, Inc.
E-mail: kcooper@ahlerslaw.com
Contact Person: Maggie J. Burger
Telephone Number: 319-291-2077 E-mail: mburger@speerfinancial.com
*Required at time of application
Section 2: Project Schedule
Anticipated final plans and specifications submittal date:
August 31, 2023
Anticipated construction start date: Fall 2023 or Spring 2024
01/2023 cmc
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-1320
Section 3: Brief Project Summary (Attach additional pages if necessary.)
Describe the reasons for the proposed project: (i.e. specific water quality problem or system improvement)
The city was issued a Consent Decree by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Iowa due to Sanitary Sewer
Overflows (SSOs) and sewer bypasses that the city has experienced. The overflows and bypasses are likely caused by inflow and
infiltration which is caused, in part, by the deteriorated collection system. Service Areas 12, 13 and 14 have been identified via
sewer televising as the area's most in need of sewer rehabilitation.
Describe the proposed project: (i.e., specific solution to the water quality problem, or proposed system improvement)
Cured -In -Place Pipelining for deteriorated sanitary sewer segments in Service Areas 12, 13 and 14 based on CUES scores obtained
during regular cleaning and televising by City of Waterloo Staff. Existing manhole rehabilitation by concrete lining, joint grout
injection and chimney seals.
Primary Impacted Waterbody: Cedar River
Designated Surface Water Uses (e.g. Al, BWW): Al, BWW1, HH
Project Will Contribute to Water Quality... (check one)
n Improvement
n Maintenance
n Not Applicable
Project Will Allow the System to... (check one)
n Achieve Compliance
n Maintain Compliance
n Not Applicable
Project Will Allow the System to Address... (check all that apply)
❑ Existing TMDL
❑ Projected TMDL
❑ Watershed Management Plan
Not Applicable
Does your project involve a consolidation of two or more wastewater systems? (check one)
❑ Yes // No If yes, list systems and populations served:
Section 4: Connection & User Revenue Information (most recent fiscal year)
Number of Connections
Percent of System Usage
Annual Revenue
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
U nmetered
Total Number of Connections:
Total Revenue:
01/2023 cmc
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-1320
Section 5: Project Cost
Cost Category
Estimated Total Cost in
$
Legal Expenses
10,000
Land and Easements
+
0
Engineering Planning Fees
+
0
Engineering Design Fees
+
120,000
Engineering Construction Fees
+
100,000
Construction
+
2,200,000
Equipment
+
Other:
+
Other:
+
PROJECT SUBTOTAL
=
2,430,000
Contingencies
+
57,562
Planning and design loan proceeds, if rolling
into construction loan
+
Less Any Funds Requested from Other Sources
-
LOAN SUBTOTAL
=
2,487,562
Loan Initiation Fee (Loan Subtotal x .005)
+
12,438
TOTAL IUP REQUEST (Round to the nearest $1,000)
=
2,500,000
Which other funding programs are you considering to assist in completion of this project? (Check all that apply)
Funding Program
Yes
No
Amount (If Known)
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
❑
X
USDA — Rural Development Grant and/or Loan
❑
X
Reserve Funds
❑
X
Other —Specify:
❑
X
01/2023 cmc
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-1320
Section 6: Acquisition of Property by SRF Applicants
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ASSURANCE WITH RESPECT TO REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION OF TITLE III OF THE UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION POLICIES ACT OF 1970 AS AMENDED
The City of Waterloo (Applicant) hereby assures that it has authority under applicable State and
local law to comply with Section 213 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970,
Public Law 91-646, 84 Stat. 1894 (42 U.S.C. 4601) as amended by the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation
Assistance Act of 1987, Title IV of Public Law 100-17, 101 Stat. 246-256 (42 U.S.C. 4601 note) and 49 CFR 1.48(cc); and
certifies, assures and agrees that, notwithstanding any other provision set forth in the application.
1. For projects resulting in the displacement of any person:
a. It will adequately inform the public of the relocation payments and services which will be available as set forth in
Subparts A, C, D and E of 49 CFR 24.
b. It will provide fair and reasonable relocation payments to displaced persons as required by Subparts D and E of 49 CFR
24.
c. It will provide a relocation assistance program for displaced persons offering services described in Subpart C of 49 CFR
24.
d. Comparable replacement dwellings will be available pursuant to Subpart F of 49 CFR 24, or provided if necessary, a
reasonable period in advance of the time any person is displaced.
e. In acquiring real property, it will provide at least 90 days written notice to each lawful occupant of real property
acquired, stating the date such occupant is required to move from a dwelling or to move his business or farm
operation.
2. For projects resulting in the acquisition of real property:
a. It will fully comply with the requirements of Subpart B of 49 CFR 24.
b. It will adequately inform the public of the acquisition policies, requirements and payments which apply to the project.
c. It will make every effort to acquire real property expeditiously through negotiation.
d. Before the initiation of negotiations, it will have the real property appraised and give the owner or his representative
an opportunity to accompany the appraiser during inspection of the property, except as provided in 49 CFR
24.102(c)(2).
e. Before the initiation of negotiations, it will establish an amount which it believes to be just compensation for the real
property, and make a prompt offer to acquire the property for that amount; and at the same time, it will provide the
owner a written statement of the basis for such amount in accordance with 49 CFR 24.102.
f. Before requiring any owner to surrender possession of real property it will pay the agreed purchase price; or deposit
with the court, for the benefit of the owner, an amount not less than the approved appraisal of the fair market value
of the property; or pay the amount of the award of compensation in a condemnation proceeding for the property.
g. If interest in real property is to be acquired by exercise of the power of eminent domain, it will institute formal
condemnation proceedings and not intentionally make it necessary for an owner to institute legal proceedings to
prove the fact of the taking of this real property; and
h. It will offer to acquire the entire property, if acquisition of only part of a property would leave its owner with an
uneconomic remnant.
References to 49 CFR are citations to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 24, published in the Federal Register Vol. 54,
No. 40, March 2, 1989.
This document is hereby made part of and incorporated in any contract or agreement, or any supplements and amendments
thereto, relating to the above -identified application and shall be deemed to supersede any provision therein to the extent that
such provisions conflict with the assurances or agreements provided therein.
Legal Name of Applicant: City of Waterloo
Signature of Authorized Representative:
QuerEin 914rE
Date: 5/15/2023
01/2023 cmc
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-1320
Exhibit 11A
Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Wastewater Section
Construction Permit Application
SCHEDULE A, Construction Permit Application
APPLICANT
Owner: City of Waterloo, IA
Address: 715 Mulberry Street, Waterloo, IA 50703
Representative: Jesse Gaherty
Phone Number: 319-291-4553
Email: Jesse.Gaherty@WATERLOO-IA.ORG
ENGINEER
Firm: AECOM
Address: 501 Sycamore St, Suite 222, Waterloo, IA 50703
Project Officer: Chris Oelkers, PE
Phone Number: 319-231-6531
Email: Christopher.oelkers@aecom.com
Project Identification: CIPP Phase IVB
Estimated Start Date*: 10/1/2023 Estimated Completion Date: 6/30/2028
PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL QUESTIONS
1. Has an engineering report, facilities plan or other information previously been submitted for this project?
If Yes: Project Identity: W2023-0164A Date Submitted: 06/01/2023
2. Does the project and construction permit application, as submitted, follow the recommendations, design loadings,
construction schedule, permit limits, and conclusions of the approved engineering report or facilities plan?
If No: Provide the design basis and technical information justifying all changes.
3. Are there three complete sets of plans and specifications accompanying this application? ❑ El
For a minor gravity sewer extension within the meaning of 455B.183.3 Code of Iowa and Design Standard 11.1, two complete sets
will be adequate for expeditious approval. For more complex projects, three sets of plans and specifications may be requested.
4. Are approved standard specifications a part of this application?
If Yes: Approved Standard Specifications of
(municipality or firm): 2023 SUDAS
Date Approved: 12/9/22
Yes No
® ❑
® ❑
5. Does each set of plans and specifications or engineering report accompanying this application contain a ❑
El
"professional engineering seal" executed in conformance with 542B.16, Code of Iowa?
If No: Processing will be delayed pending receipt of applicable design schedules and certified plans, specifications or
engineering report.
6. Is this a joint wastewater and water supply project? ❑
If Yes: A construction permit application for the water supply project should be submitted separately to the Water Supply Section.
A Water Supply permit fee may be required.
7. Is the applicant to provide treatment of effluent resulting from this construction? ® ❑
If No: A Sewage Treatment Agreement executed by the authority providing treatment must accompany this form.
8. Is a new or amended operation permit necessary to use the facilities described in this application? ❑
If Yes: A new or amended permit to operate may be requested prior to the receipt of a construction permit.
9. Is any waterline located within 10 feet; or any private or public well, lake, or public recreation area located within 400 ❑
feet of the proposed construction?
If Yes: Identify and locate the facility(ies) relative to the proposed construction.
10. Will construction inspection be conducted by a licensed engineer employed by the applicant? ❑El
If No: Name of Engineering Firm Conducting Inspection: AECOM
11. Will this project utilize CWSRF loan funds? ® ❑
CERTIFICATION
APPLICANT ENGINEER
I certify that I am the authorized representative of the owner and I certify that all aspects of the design included in this application
state that the project identified above is approved by the owner. conform to applicable standards contained in Chapter 567 IAC 64,
or that an explanation and justification for any proposed variations
from such standards is attached. I am familiar with the information
contained in this application and, to the best of my knowledge,
y such information is complete and accurate.
Signature C / Date 4-25-23 Signature Date 4-25-23
*Estima Construction Start D e: Complete applications must be submitted at least 120 days in advance of the date for starting
constru ion in accordance with Rules 567 IAC 60.4 and 64.2
Please complete the Schedule Checklist on the following page of this form.
04/2016 cmc
L:\DCS\Projects\WTR\60682318_CIPP_Ph_IVA3\400_Technical\415_ PH IVB SRF\IUP\02 - IDNR-CIPP PH IVB - Waterloo_ScheduleA 5423129.dacx
DNR Form 542-3129; 28A
DOCUMENT CHECKLIST
Identify all categories included in this project. Also, identify schedules attached to this application.
Schedul Included in
e Title Attached Project Submittal Date
B Collection System ❑ 0
C Lateral Sewer Extension ❑ ❑
D Trunk & Interceptor Sewer 0 0
E Wastewater Pump Station 0 0
F Treatment Project Site Selection 0 0
G Treatment Project Design Data ❑ ❑
H1 Schematic Flow Diagram 0 0
Treatment Process Loading and Removal
H2 Efficiency ❑ 0
H3 Mechanical Plant Reliability 0 0
I Screening, Grit Removal and Flow Measurement 0 0
J Septic Tank System 0 0
K1 Controlled Discharge Pond 0 0
K2 Aerated Pond 0 0
K3 Anaerobic Lagoon 0 0
L Setting Tanks ❑ 0
M Fixed Film Reactor -Stationary Media 0 0
N Rotating Biological Contactor 0 0
O Aeration Tanks or Basins 0 0
P Gas Chlorination 0 0
Q Sludge Digestion and Holding 0 0
R1 Sludge Dewatering and Disposal 0 0
R2 (A&B) Low Rate Land Application of Sludge 0 0
Land Application of Sewage Sludge (To be
R3 developed) 0 ❑
S Land Application of Wastewater (To be developed) ❑ ❑
Sewage Treatment Agreement ❑ ❑
Identify any categories included in this project which are not provided in the above list of schedules.
Cured in Place Pipelining and Manhole Rehabilitation
04/2016 cmc
L:\DCS\Projects\WTR\60682318_CIPP_Ph_IVA3\400„Technical\415_ PH IVB SRF\IUP\02- IDNR-CIPP PH IVB- Waterloo_ScheduleA 5423129.docx
DNR Form 542-3129; 28A
SRF Environmental Review Checklist
The following checklist outlines the information needed to start the SRF Environmental Review (ER)
Services. Please provide the following to: srf-iup@dnr.iowa.gov
*Environmental Review Services will not be initiated until after all items marked REQUIRED are received.
Applicant Name: City of Waterloo, Iowa SRF
Applicant point of contact for environmental review (name): Chris Oelkers, P.E.
Telephone Number: 319-232-6531
Point of contacts role in project: Engineer
Email:
christopher.oelkers@aecom.com
✓ Contact information for other stakeholders in the project:
STATE
REVOLVING FUND
✓ The anticipated construction start date for the proposed project. (Check ALL that apply)
n T• he anticipated construction start date on the current IUP application is correct.
n T• he anticipated construction start date has changed from the date listed in the IUP application.
• What is the new anticipated construction start date for the project?
n T• he proposed project schedule is dependent on other funding source(s).
• Will the construction start date be delayed if other funding is not awarded? n Yes // No
n T• he proposed project schedule is dependent on an existing compliance schedule.
• What is the construction start date listed in the compliance schedule?
✓ A description of the current project scope including: what is proposed to be constructed, specific construction
methods that will be used, estimated dimensions (length, width, depth) of excavated areas and the proposed
construction schedule if construction will be phased (REQUIRED).
The city was issued a Consent Decree by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Iowa due to Sanitary Sewer
Overflows (SSOs) and sewer bypasses that the city has experienced. The overflows and bypasses are likely caused by inflow and
infiltration which is caused, in part, by the deteriorated collection system. Service Areas 12, 13 and 14 have been identified via
sewer televising as the area's most in need of sewer rehabilitation. Cured -In -Place Pipelining for deteriorated sanitary sewer
segments in Service Areas 12, 13 and 14 based on CUES scores obtained during regular cleaning and televising by City of
Waterloo Staff. Existing manhole rehabilitation by concrete lining, joint grout injection and chimney seals.
This is a non-destructive project. There will be no digging just repairing existing facilities in place within City Easement.
✓ Will an easement be necessary for the construction of the project? n Not applicable
n Yes. Please indicate the status of the easement (i.e. existing, proposed, in negotiation, finalized, etc.):
✓ Landowner permission is required for archaeological survey on private property, if needed. *Please note that
archaeological survey will not begin until this permission is obtained.
n Y• es, landowner permission has been obtained.
Does the landowner(s) have any specific requests or requirements for archeological work to be conducted?
(for example, before/after harvest)? acres
n N• o, landowner permission has not been obtained at this time.
• When is landowner permission anticipated to be obtained?
01/2023 cmc
Page 1of3
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-0618
✓ Indicate if any of the following ancillary impacts will result from the proposed project. (Check ALL that apply; these are
required to be included on the site sketch)
n A• bandonment or demolition (partial or entire) of existing building/structures
n B• orrow pits
n S• taging areas for equipment and materials
n T• emporary and/or permanent easement areas
n P• avement replacement (street, driveway, sidewalk)
n N• ew access for roads/utility lines
✓ A recent aerial map with the marked boundaries of the project area. The map should also include labeled location(s)
of all proposed construction boundaries (include any ancillary impacts listed above as applicable). If a specific area
has yet to be defined, please mark a larger area that will include the final project area.
n A• n aerial map of the project area map is included (REQUIRED):
• What is the approximate size of the total project area? 3,450 acres
• How much of the total project area will be impacted by ground -disturbing (excavation, grading, tree removal,
etc.) construction activity? 0 acres
n A • site sketch of the project area map is included with the following (REQUIRED):
• All locations of ground disturbance and staging areas marked
• North arrow
• A minimum of one labeled street
n S• hape files have been provided (ArcGIS Shape Files including all .cpg, .dbf, .prj, .shp, .shx OR Google Earth
.kml/.kmz)
✓ Photos with a descriptive caption (include location & direction) of the project area showing current land use and
habitat. (REQUIRED)
n P• hotos with captions are included (digital files are preferred).
✓ Indicate which of the following impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. (Check ALL that apply)
n D• emolition, abandonment or rehabilitation of any building/structure over 50 years old. Picture(s) showing the
interior and exterior facade of the building/structure should be provided. Provide the following information for
each building/structure over 50 years old that will be impacted.
• What year was the building/structure originally constructed? If the exact year is unknown, provide an
estimate (REQUIRED). dna
If the building/structure is over 45 years old, please answer the following:
• Picture(s) showing the interior and exterior facade of the building/structure should be provided.
• What is the visible material(s) of the roof, walls, and foundation?
• Have any additions or substantial alterations to the building/structure occurred? If so, describe what was done
and when.
n Not applicable
n B• rick sewers or street surfaces will be disturbed by construction activity.
n Sewers n Manholes
n Streets n Other:
❑X Not applicable
• Has a historic context (including Iowa Site Inventory Forms) been prepared for the brick sewers/street
surfaces? n Yes // No
• Describe any planned steps to minimize adverse effect to the brick sewers/streets.
01/2023 cmc
Page 2 of 3
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-0618
n Existing prairie will be disturbed by construction activity. ❑X Not applicable
• How much prairie will be disturbed? acres
• Has a floral study been conducted of the prairie area? n Yes ❑ No
• Describe any planned steps to minimize adverse effect to the prairie.
❑ Trees (greater than 4" diameter breast height) will be removed. n Not applicable
• Will tree removal occur between October 1 and March 31 to avoid impacting federally threatened or
endangered bat species during the summer maternity period? n Yes n No
❑ Wetlands will be disturbed by construction activity. ❑X Not applicable
• How much of the wetland area will be permanently impacted? acres
• What construction method(s) are planned for the crossing?
• Has a Joint Application been submitted to determine permit requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Planned stream/creek crossings. ❑ Not applicable
• What is the name of the stream/creek crossing? Cedar River
• What construction method(s) are planned for the crossing?
Utilize existing bridge for aerial crossing of force main
• Will excavation activity take place to the bed, bank of the stream/creek? ❑ Yes // No
• Has a Joint Application been submitted to determine permit requirements? ❑ Yes // No
❑ Planned work within a mapped 100-year flood plain. ❑ Not applicable
• What construction activity is planned within the flood plain?
• What construction method(s) are planned for work within the flood plain?
• If ground disturbance will occur, will pre -construction contours be restored after construction activity is
completed? n Yes // No
• Has a Joint Application been submitted to determine permit requirements? ❑ Yes // No
❑ Planned work within state or federal owned and/or managed land. ❑ Not applicable
• What construction activity is planned within state/federal land?
• Has a Joint Application been submitted to determine permit requirements? n Yes // No
**In the interest of keeping your project on schedule, SRF recommends submitting the Joint Application as soon as plans are
detailed enough to do so.
n Farmland will be permanently converted to non-agricultural uses. n Not applicable
• What is the total size of the farm unit(s) that contains the project area? acres
• How much of the project area has been farmed (managed for a scheduled harvest, haying, pasture or timber
activity) more than 5 of the last 10 years? acres
• How much of the project area will be permanently converted from agricultural use as a result of the proposed
project? acres
✓ Additional comments:
This is a non-destructive project. There will be no digging just repairing existing facilities in place within City Easement. Existing sanitary sewer will be lined in place. Existing manholes will be rehabilitated in place.
01/2023 cmc
Page 3 of 3
INVESTING IN IOWA'S WATER
www.iowasrf.com
DNR Form 542-0618
Plotted: 4/24/2023, 11:01:06 AM
09
O4
N
LOGAN AVE.
3
f 4Vy„'•
SA 12
•
a. a • • •
• ' 11. 1
•
1• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1
1 i#�•
• •1
1 1 • •#
I 1 1 , •
1 1I 8 1 1••,
•
1' ,N0'V1N `•••••••
1
•1 to. IT 1
1• •
•
•
•
♦
4.8
1M1 MD al
SA 14
O°e� 1
4 po
90
•• ♦♦ ••••••••1
I ♦�
I ♦♦
I ♦
1
1
1
INDEPENDENCE AVENUE 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
al al al al al al 1M1
T•
4
N
0' 500' 1000' 2000'
SCALE
�• PREPARED BY'.
eb
i
FIGURE 1
PROJECT OVERVIEW
CIPP PH IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO
WATERLOO, IOWA
501 SYCAMORE STREET SUITE 222 WATERLOO, IA. 50703-4644 1-319-232-6531 MAY 2023 60682318
A=COM
Plotted: 4/24/2023, 11:18:07 AM
• • •
• • • • •
•
♦
/
•
/
• • •.*/\,.
•
• >
•
♦
•
• • • • •.
•
♦•II
♦•
♦ 1
♦t 1
i
•♦ I
JU016\1!1°
•
•••
•
••
•
♦
1
1
1•••
••
•
•
•
1
1
1
1
1
•••••-
INDEPENDENCE AVENUE
1
1
1
1
1
1
LEGEND
FUTURE WORK RATED 40-100
0' 250' 500' 1000'
SCALE
FIGURE 2
SERVICE AREA 12
CIPP PH IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO
WATERLOO, IOWA
501 SYCAMORE STREET SUITE 222 WATERLOO, IA. 50703-4644 1-319-232-6531 MAY 2023 60682318
PREPARED BY,
A=COM
Plotted: 4/24/2023, 11:36:37 AM
•
1
1
Im
1
1
1
1
•
0 W I I
•
1
J
1
1
1
1
♦
♦
♦
♦•`
• `
•
• • I
♦•`
••9
• •
i
I•
I • ♦
•
1 • •
Jam' O
1 ♦ M�
1 ♦
1 ♦
♦
1
1
1
1
1
111
1 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE
1
.I ♦
♦
♦
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 GQG
1 F
LEGEND
FUTURE WORK RATED 40-100
0' 250' 500' 1000'
SCALE
PREPARED BY,
A=COM
FIGURE 3
SERVICE AREA 13
CIPP PH IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO
WATERLOO, IOWA
501 SYCAMORE STREET SUITE 222 WATERLOO, IA. 50703-4644 1-319-232-6531 MAY 2023
60682318
Plotted: 4/24/2023, 11:44:43 AM
••GPI
1
• al 4111110
• ♦
•
•
1
INDEPENDENCE-. VENUE
1
1
• 1
1
1
1
1
1
OP MI ale
1
0
•40 in 40 as 40) IS MD ID MI
•
••
••
•
♦•
•
LEGEND
FUTURE WORK RATED 40-100
0' 500' 1000' 2000'
SCALE
PREPARED BY,
A=COM
FIGURE 4
SERVICE AREA 14
CIPP PH IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO
WATERLOO, IOWA
501 SYCAMORE STREET SUITE 222 WATERLOO, IA. 50703-4644 1-319-232-6531 MAY 2023
60682318
Socioeconomic Assessment Worksheet
Fiscal Year 2023
Instructions
Enter or select each community that makes up the utility's service area in the blue boxes below, along with the corresponding percent of population served (must equal 100%). A
weighted average for each metric will be calculated and assigned points.
Example, a utility serving three communities with a combined population of 50,000 may look like this:
Population
Weighted Percent
City A City B
City C
Total
25,000
50.00%
15,000
30.00%
10,000
20.00%
50,000
100.00%
Percent of Population Served:
Enter or Select Communities:
100.00%
I
100.00%
Waterloo
■
Total Service Area
(Wtd. Avg.)
1 Median Household Income (MHI)
$47,327
$47,327
2 Percent Below Poverty Level
17.4%
17.4%
3 Percent Receiving Public Assistance or SNAP
18.4%
18.4%
4 Percent Receiving Supplemental Security Income
6.9%
6.9%
5 Unemployment Rate (Primary County 12 mo avg)
3.6%
3.6%
6 Percent Not in Labor Force
34.5%
34.5%
7 Percent over Age 65
16.0%
16.0%
8 Population Trend (2010-2020)
-1.6%
-1.6%
9 Percent with High School Diploma or Less
11.6%
11.6%
10 Percent of Vacant Homes (excl. Seasonal and Vacation)
9.4%
9.4%
11 Percent Housing Cost Burdened (>= 30%of Income)
26.4%
26.4%
12 Percent Minority
29.2%
29.2%
13 Social Vulnerability Index (Primary County)
82.65
82.65
14 Assessed Valuation/Capita
$60,755
$60,755
15 Outstanding Debt/Capita
$1,939
$1,939
TOTAL
Percent Households Below 200%Federal Poverty Level
41.0%
41.0%
Lowest Quintile Income (Upper Bound)*
$20,528
$20,528
* Some communities are too small to have reliable LQI data. In su h cases, the second -lowest quintile limit is us d.
Points
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
0
1
23
Name of Applicant: CITY OF WATERLOO, IOWA
State of Iowa
$60,523
11.5%
10.8%
4.2%
4.1%
32.7%
16.7%
7.9%
7.9%
21.8%
14.3%
A
$62,300
„,
A
Project: CIPP PHASE IVB
vs. Other Iowa Communities
1
1
1
1-
1
1
1
1-
1
4/24/2023
AXOM
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements -
CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
Prepared For:
City of Waterloo
715 Mulberry Street
Waterloo, Iowa 50703
Prepared By:
AECOM
501 Sycamore Street, Suite 222
P.O. Box 1497
Waterloo, Iowa 50704-1497
May 2023
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - CIPP PHASE IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO, IOWA
PREPARED FOR:
CITY OF WATERLOO, IOWA
PREPARED BY:
AECOM
MAY 2023
CERTIFICATION
COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - CIPP PHASE IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO, IOWA
MAY 2023
.��`0,0;r ssl+tp,,,,to ,,,
`�ie-'N 0 N,q` •,�,,
:tea 0
HARMANJIT . G�
MALLHI . Z
F.c., 1 20806 _
��'=.,�.`�s
I hereby certify that this engineering document was prepared by me or
under my direct personal supervision and that I am a duly licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Iowa.
4/26/2023
Christopher G Oelkers, PE
License No. 22053
Date
My license renewal date is December 31, 2023.
Pages or sheets covered by this seal:
ALL
Date Issued:
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
INTRODUCTION 2
PURPOSE 2
SCOPE 2
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROJECTIONS 3
PLANNING PERIOD 3
POPULATION 3
EXISTING CONDITIONS 3
ALTERNATIVES AND DESIGN CRITERIA 5
PIPELINE REHABILITATION 5
CIPP DESIGN 6
MANHOLE REHABILITATION DESIGN 6
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 7
COST EVALUATION 7
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND FINANCING 7
RECOMMENDATIONS 8
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 8
REFERENCES 8
APPENDIX 1 — SERVICE AREA MAPS
APPENDIX 2 — PIPE GRADING SYSTEM ILLUSTRATION
APPENDIX 3 — CUES PIPE GRADING SYSTEM INFORMATION
L:IDCS1Projects\WTR160682318CIPP Ph_IVA31400Technica11415 PH IVB SRF
May 2023
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Waterloo is the sixth largest city in Iowa and is located on the Cedar River in northeastern
Iowa. The City operates a wastewater collection system that is comprised of approximately 400 miles of
sanitary sewers, 9,300 sanitary manholes, 46,240 LF of force mains and 26 lift stations. The City was
issued a Consent Decree by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Iowa due to
Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) and sewer bypasses that the City has experienced. The overflows and
bypasses are likely caused by inflow and infiltration which is caused, in part, by the deteriorated collection
system. The sewer system in Waterloo is divided into service areas. Service Areas 12, 13 and 14 have
been identified via sewer televising as the area's most in need of sewer rehabilitation.
The purpose and scope of this project is:
1. To rehabilitate sanitary sewers in Service Areas 12, 13 and 14.
2. To rehabilitate manholes that have deteriorated in Service Areas 12, 13 and 14.
Various trenchless technologies were evaluated for rehabilitating sewers in Service Areas 12, 13 and 14.
This included evaluation of sliplining, pipe bursting and cured -in -place pipe (CIPP). CIPP was determined
to be the most suitable technology for this application. Manhole rehabilitation was also evaluated; and
cementitious mortar topped with an epoxy liner was determined to be the most suitable method. The City
has successfully used this method in the past to rehabilitate manholes.
The City has budgeted $500,000 per fiscal year starting in FY24 to FY28 (5yrs) for a total of $2,500,000
for these improvements, these costs include legal, engineering and contingencies.
As the entirety of this project is in previously disturbed areas, no environmental impact is anticipated.
The project is anticipated to begin construction in fall of 2023, with anticipated completion in fall 2028.
This project will include up to five phases spread over these five years. We anticipate one project per
year.
L:IDCS1Projects\WTR160682318CIPP Ph_IVA31400Technical\
415_ PH IVB SRFIFacility Plan
-1-
May 2023
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE
The City of Waterloo operates a wastewater collection system that is comprised of approximately 400
miles of sanitary sewers, 9,300 sanitary manholes, 46,240 LF of force mains and 26 lift stations. The
flows collected are treated at the City's Water Pollution Control Facility under National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. 0790001. The collection system is classified by Service Areas
(SA), see Appendix 1. There are a total of 15 SAs. The collection system and the treatment plant are
operated by the City's Waste Management Services Department.
The City has experienced SSOs and bypassing during wet weather events, which led to the City being
issued a Consent Decree (CD) by the EPA and the State of Iowa. Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) are the
primary causes of the SSOs and bypasses. As part of the CD, the City is required to assess the condition
of the collection system. This assessment (conducted via sewer televising), it was determined that the
next priority should be given to SA 12, SA 13 and SA 14. The City previously lined the sewers in Service
Areas 15, 16 and 19 under the previous SRF IUP S2016-0285. Approximately 175,000 feet of sanitary
sewer was lined, and 500 manholes were rehabilitated resulting in a significant decrease in inflow and
infiltration as part of this this program under S2016-0285. This new project is intended to extend this
successful program.
SCOPE
The scope of the project is to line the following manholes and pipes:
SA 12:
• 28,000 LF of Sanitary Sewer
• 126 Manholes
SA 13:
• 37,000 LF of Sanitary Sewer
• 31 Manholes
SA 14:
• 25,000 LF
• 50 Manholes
L:IDCS1Projects\WTR160682318CIPP Ph_IVA31400Technical\
415_ PH IVB SRFIFacility Plan
-2- May 2023
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROJECTIONS
PLANNING PERIOD
Since sewer projects are intended to have a 50-year design life, the planning period for the improvements
will be 50 years for a design year of 2073.
POPULATION
The population of the City of Waterloo has grown from 4,337 in 1870 to 66,941 in 2021. Figure 1 below
shows the population trends for the City of Waterloo.
90,000
80,000
70,000
2 60,000
0
Q 50,000
a 40,000
0
a- 30,000
20,000
10,000
0
CITY OF WATERLOO - POPULATION TREND
1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
YEAR
Figure 1: City of Waterloo Population Trends
As can be seen from the figure above, the population of Waterloo has either decreased or stayed stable
since 1980. Furthermore, SA 12, SA 13 and SA 14 are almost fully developed, with little to no growth
anticipated in these areas. Given the population trends and the level of development in the service areas,
future flows are not anticipated to rise significantly when compared with current flows.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
A majority of the existing pipe in SA 12, SA 13 and SA 14 was installed in the 1950s and 1960s. The pipe
has therefore outlived its typical useful life of 50 years for underground utilities. The pipe has been
televised and rated by city staff. In all three services areas, a majority of the pipe shows signs of age and
experiences infiltration.
L:IDCSIProjects\WTR160682318CIPP Ph_IVA31400Technical\
415_ PH IVB SRFIFacility Plan -3- May 2023
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
The City uses Granite XP CUES Inspection software to televise sewer lines. SA 12, 13 and SA 14 were
televised using this method. After televising, the video was analyzed by city staff and given a grade from
0-100, as follows:
100-80, Immediate Action: Defects Requiring Immediate Attention
79-60, Poor: Sever Defects That Will Become Grade 5 Defects Within the Foreseeable Future
59-40, Fair: Moderate Defects That Will Continue to Deteriorate
39-20, Good: Defects That Have Not Begun to Deteriorate
19-0, Excellent: Minor Defects
An illustration of this system is included in Appendix 2. All pipes receiving Grade 59 or poorer were
deemed suited for rehabilitation. The "Standard Observations for Sanitary Systems" manual for CUES is
included in Appendix 3.
Like the piping in SA 12, 13 and SA 14, manholes were also inspected in these areas. The manholes
were inspected by the contractor responsible for the manhole rehabilitation completed under the previous
SRF S2016-0285. The inspections were completed in consultation with the Engineer. Manholes showing
signs of infiltration were identified for rehabilitation.
L:IDCS1Projects\WTR160682318CIPP Ph_IVA31400Technical\
415_ PH IVB SRFIFacility Plan
-4- May 2023
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
ALTERNATIVES AND DESIGN CRITERIA
As mentioned previously, there are three separate components to the project:
1. Pipe Rehabilitation: This is the largest portion of the project and involves rehabilitating pipelines in
Service Areas 12, 13 and 14.
2. Manhole Rehabilitation: This involves rehabilitating manholes in Service Areas 15 and 16.
PIPELINE REHABILITATION
For all other areas, pipe excavation and replacement would likely be very expensive and could cause
significant traffic and existing utility concerns. Therefore, pipe replacement was not considered any
further for Service Areas 12, 13 and 14.
Multiple trenchless technologies are available for rehabilitating deteriorated sewer piping, such as:
1. Sliplining
2. Pipe Bursting
3. CIPP
Sliplining: Sliplining, in general, involves disconnecting existing services and laterals and pushing/pulling
a new pipe into an older deteriorated pipe. The services are then reconnected and the annular space
between pipes may be grouted. Typically, HDPE pipe is used for sliplining.
The primary advantage of sliplining is that it may be completed while the sewer is in operation; bypass
pumping is typically not required. Also, it is the simplest of the three technologies discussed here in
terms of contractor expertise required for installation.
However, there are significant disadvantages to using this system for this particular project:
1. Sliplining significantly reduces pipe capacity since the new pipe must be smaller than the existing
pipe. Furthermore, HDPE pipe typically has a thicker wall when compared with PVC and DIP,
which would further reduce the actual final inside diameter.
2. Service and lateral connections must be excavated to be connected.
3. Laterals and service connections must be connected carefully. During installation significant
stresses are placed on the HDPE pipe, causing the pipe to expand. After the pressures are
relieved, the pipe slowly returns to its original shape. If the laterals and connections are installed
too quickly, the liner pipe may move past the connection point, creating a blockage.
Given these disadvantages, this alternative was not evaluated any further.
Pipe Bursting: Pipe bursting involves the insertion of a conical -shaped bursting head onto an old pipe.
The head fractures the existing pipe and displaces the pipe fragments outward into the soil. As the head
fractures the pipe, a new pipe is pulled in behind the bursting head. Multiple proprietary bursting
techniques are available; the right technology typically depends on the material of construction of the
existing pipe.
The primary advantage of pipe bursting is that it does not reduce pipe size as part of the rehabilitation;
both sliplining, to a large degree, and CIPP, to a small degree, reduce pipe capacity as part of the
rehabilitation.
L:IDCS1Projects\WTR160682318CIPP Ph_IVA31400Technical\
415_ PH IVB SRFIFacility Plan
-5- May 2023
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
The following are some disadvantages of using this system for this project:
1. Similar to sliplining, service and lateral connections must be excavated to be connected. In this
case, it should be ensured that connections are cut and protected prior to beginning bursting.
2. The proximity of utilities to the area where pipe bursting is being conducted should be very well
documented. Pipe bursting typically is not conducted if other utilities (potable water, electrical, etc.)
are close to the sewer. This can be of particular concern if the existing utility is in a state of
deterioration itself.
3. Bypass pumping is typically required for pipe bursting.
4. Heaving of the existing ground is also possible and should be considered during design.
Given these disadvantages, this alternative was not evaluated any further.
CIPP: The CIPP process generally consists of the installation of a resin -impregnated felt tube in the pipe
to be rehabilitated. The liner is inverted into the pipe to be rehabilitated using water, and then the resin is
cured using heat to form a solid pipe within the deteriorated pipe.
CIPP is the most common means for pipe rehabilitation in Iowa. The popularity of CIPP is driven by the
fact that it does not have some of the significant disadvantages associated with pipe bursting and
sliplining. The following are some of the advantages of the CIPP process:
1. The City has used this process successfully in the past to rehabilitate pipe.
2. The felt can be custom designed for each project, an advantage that cannot be provided either by
sliplining or pipe bursting.
3. Cutting in services and laterals is easier via cutting tools commonly used in this process.
4. Although pipe diameter is slightly reduced when CIPP is installed in the host pipe, this
disadvantage is often overcome by the low friction the CIPP surface offers when compared with
traditional pipe surfaces.
The primary disadvantage of CIPP is that the sewer must be bypassed for installation in high flow
pipelines. Also, the system must be carefully designed in terms of the thickness of CIPP to be used.
Given the many advantages of CIPP over the other trenchless technologies, CIPP was chosen for lining
the pipes in Service Areas 12, 13 and 14.
CIPP DESIGN
Statewide Urban Design and Specifications (SUDAS) Design Manual Section 14C - Rehabilitation will be
used as the primary guide for the design of the CIPP lining. A combination of correct resin strengths and
liner thicknesses will be determined for each part of the project in line with the recommendations of
SUDAS Design Manual Section 14C.
MANHOLE REHABILITATION DESIGN
Unlike pipe rehabilitation, available options are limited for manhole rehabilitation. In general, manholes
are either repaired using a cementitious mortar liner with an epoxy seal or a new manhole is cast in the
existing manhole using cast -in -place concrete. Either method is suitable for manhole rehabilitation. In
the past, the City has successfully used the cementitious mortar liner method. It is likely that this method
L:IDCS1Projects\WTR160682318CIPP Ph_IVA31400Technical\
415_ PH IVB SRFIFacility Plan
-6- May 2023
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
will be used again. In addition to the manhole, the chimneys of these manholes will also be sealed, as
needed, as part of the project. SUDAS Specifications Section 6020, with appropriate modifications, will
likely be used as the basis for design.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Since the project involves primarily rehabilitating existing piping and manholes, no significant
environmental impact is anticipated for this project.
COST EVALUATION
Through the evolution of this program, the City has begun to budget $500,000 per year for CIPP projects
on a continuing basis. Therefore, there is no formal cost evaluation with quantities. The City will continue
using a phased approach for these CIPP projects. Instead of basing these on quantities, the City will line
as many segments as possible to reach the budgetary value of $500,000 per year. The City will start in
the north half of Service Area 12 and continue through Service Area 12 to the south and then on to
Service Areas 13 and 14.
The total cost of this project is bound by the Environmental Assessment. The Environmental Assessment
results expire after five years. Therefore, the total cost of this project is $500,000 X 5 years for a total of
$2,500,000.
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND FINANCING
According to the US Census Bureau, the median household income for Waterloo, Iowa, is $46,942, with
per capita income at $27,887 (2020 dollars).
The current sewer system has approximately 70,000 connections. The collection system is funded via
use fees established by the City of Waterloo City Council. The current rates for typical non -industrial
users are based on water meter readings and were adopted in July 2015. Prior to adopting these rates,
$11.1 million were generated in FY 2022. This includes fees paid by Tyson and Twin City tanneries, the
two major industrial loads. The new rates are anticipated to generate approximately $1.5 million in
additional funds for the Waste Management Services budget.
There are multiple options that may be used for funding the project. These include, but are not limited to,
General Obligation (GO) Bonds, Sewer Revenue Bonds, United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Special Assessments, and the Clean Water
State Revolving Fund (CWSRF).
The City is in the process of developing an application to apply for the CWSRF loan; this facility plan will
be part of that application. The CWSRF is a loan program administered by the Iowa Finance Authority
and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). SWSRF loan funds can be used by
municipalities and sanitary districts to finance the design and construction of publicly owned wastewater
treatment and conveyance improvements. The CWSRF offers low interest loans (currently at 1.75%).
The loans are similar to revenue bonding since user charge revenues are normally used to secure the
loan. In addition to the interest, the loans have an initiation fee of 1 % of the loan agreement amount and
a servicing fee of 0.25% of the outstanding loan principle. Each loan must be secured by a bond to
assure parity with other local debt. This bond can be either a Revenue Bond or GO Bond. For revenue
secured loans, the coverage requirement is 110% of the amount needed for debt. The improvements will
likely be funded in the long term (SRF loan installments) using the Waste Management Services budget.
L:IDCS1Projects\WTR160682318CIPP Ph_IVA31400Technical\
415_ PH IVB SRFIFacility Plan
-7- May 2023
Preliminary Engineering Report
Collection System Improvements - CIPP Phase IVB
City of Waterloo, Iowa
At this time, the City does not intend to spend more than $2,500,000 on the construction of the project.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the analysis provided here and the City's previous success with using CIPP for rehabilitating
pipe, it is recommended that Service Areas 12, 13 and 14 be lined with CIPP for pipe rehabilitation.
Manhole rehabilitation has recently been completed using cementitious mortar liner with an epoxy
topcoat. It is recommended that the manholes identified be rehabilitated in this manner.
The areas that televising has shown to require remedial actions should also be remedied using traditional
means of exposing and repairing the pipe.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
The project is scheduled to begin in the fall of 2023; and construction is anticipated to continue through
fall of 2028.
REFERENCES
1. Statewide Urban Design and Specifications (SUDAS) Design Manual and Specifications
L:IDCS1Projects\WTR160682318CIPP Ph_IVA31400Technical\
415_ PH IVB SRFIFacility Plan
-8- May 2023
APPENDIX 1
SERVICE AREA MAPS
Plotted: 4/24/2023, 11:01:06 AM
09
O4
N
LOGAN AVE.
3
f 4Vy„'•
SA 12
•
a. a • • •
• ' 11. 1
•
1• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1
1 i#�•
• •1
1 1 • •#
I 1 1 , •
1 1I 8 1 1••,
•
1' ,N0'V1N `•••••••
1
•1 to. IT 1
1• •
•
•
•
♦
4.8
1M1 MD al
SA 14
O°e� 1
4 po
90
•• ♦♦ ••••••••1
I ♦�
I ♦♦
I ♦
1
1
1
INDEPENDENCE AVENUE 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
al al al al al al 1M1
T•
4
N
0' 500' 1000' 2000'
SCALE
�• PREPARED BY'.
eb
i
FIGURE 1
PROJECT OVERVIEW
CIPP PH IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO
WATERLOO, IOWA
501 SYCAMORE STREET SUITE 222 WATERLOO, IA. 50703-4644 1-319-232-6531 MAY 2023 60682318
A=COM
Plotted: 4/24/2023, 11:18:07 AM
• • •
• • • • •
•
♦
/
•
/
• • •.*/\,.
•
• >
•
♦
•
• • • • •.
•
♦•II
♦•
♦ 1
♦t 1
i
•♦ I
JU016\1!1°
•
•••
•
••
•
♦
1
1
1•••
••
•
•
•
1
1
1
1
1
•••••-
INDEPENDENCE AVENUE
1
1
1
1
1
1
LEGEND
FUTURE WORK RATED 40-100
0' 250' 500' 1000'
SCALE
FIGURE 2
SERVICE AREA 12
CIPP PH IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO
WATERLOO, IOWA
501 SYCAMORE STREET SUITE 222 WATERLOO, IA. 50703-4644 1-319-232-6531 MAY 2023 60682318
PREPARED BY,
A=COM
Plotted: 4/24/2023, 11:36:37 AM
•
1
1
Im
1
1
1
1
•
0 W I I
•
1
J
1
1
1
1
♦
♦
♦
♦•`
• `
•
• • I
♦•`
••9
• •
i
I•
I • ♦
•
1 • •
Jam' O
1 ♦ M�
1 ♦
1 ♦
♦
1
1
1
1
1
111
1 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE
1
.I ♦
♦
♦
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 GQG
1 F
LEGEND
FUTURE WORK RATED 40-100
0' 250' 500' 1000'
SCALE
PREPARED BY,
A=COM
FIGURE 3
SERVICE AREA 13
CIPP PH IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO
WATERLOO, IOWA
501 SYCAMORE STREET SUITE 222 WATERLOO, IA. 50703-4644 1-319-232-6531 MAY 2023
60682318
Plotted: 4/24/2023, 11:44:43 AM
••GPI
1
• al 4111110
• ♦
•
•
1
INDEPENDENCE-. VENUE
1
1
• 1
1
1
1
1
1
OP MI ale
1
0
•40 in 40 as 40) IS MD ID MI
•
••
••
•
♦•
•
LEGEND
FUTURE WORK RATED 40-100
0' 500' 1000' 2000'
SCALE
PREPARED BY,
A=COM
FIGURE 4
SERVICE AREA 14
CIPP PH IVB
CITY OF WATERLOO
WATERLOO, IOWA
501 SYCAMORE STREET SUITE 222 WATERLOO, IA. 50703-4644 1-319-232-6531 MAY 2023
60682318
APPENDIX 2
PIPE GRADING SYSTEM ILLUSTRATION
' I~
�T
City of Waterloo
Condition
Assessment Program
,4+rlou 1a
1
Structural and O&M Defects Grading Table
Grade
Grade Description
Grade Definition
100-80
Immediate Action
Defects requiring immediate attention
79-60
Poor
Severe defects that will become Grade 5 defects within the foreseeable future
59-40
Fair
Moderate defects that will continue to deteriorate
39-20
Good
Defects that have not begun to deteriorate
19-0
Excellent
Minor defects
1
li
•e•_
1111011111N
oF.,,., ,.--?.
; ` , .
80
eclifapseil
Collapsed
Collapsed
Roots
79 -
60
`
Infiltration
Crack
59 -�
40
r
-
Infiltration
kiii
Joint 0 " - -
"" `Crack
20 Infiltration
Crack
19-
0
New Pipe
General Guidelines Regarding Deterioration Rates -
Grade
Grade Definition
100-80
Pipe has failed or will likely fail within the next 5 years
79-60
Pipe will probably fail in 5 to 10 years
59-40
Pipe may fail in 10 to 20 years
39-20
Pipe unlikely to fail for at least 20 years
19-0
Failure unlikely in the foreseeable future
'
The time estimated for pipe deterioration will vary based an local conditions.
The grade definitions are to be used as a general guideline only.
APPENDIX 3
CUES PIPE GRADING SYSTEM INFORMATION
Asset Inspeolion & Decision Support Soflwere
for the Wales Industry
4
51.
"The Standard of the Industry"
CUE
Standard Observations for
Sanitary Systems v.3
P/N:TBD 042007
9.8 FT.
lw 1 ):4PT w 2 3
4
OBSERVATIONS/DEFECTS IN THE SEWER
PIPELINE SYSTEM
CUES INC.
3600, RIO VISTA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FL 32805
Sanitary system standard observations/defects Page 1
INTRODUCTION
Many municipalities have different departments dedicated to specific infrastructure
issues. For example, an operation and maintenance problem is addressed by the
Sanitary Maintenance Department; where as a structural problem would be maintained
by the Sanitary Engineering Department. CUES standard observation codes are
categorized so that users will be able to prioritize the task based on the category and
assign follow up actions to the appropriate departments.
The four observation categories for observation codes are:
a. Structural
b. Operation and Maintenance
c. Inventory
d. Miscellaneous
NOTE: The users will be able to add/delete observations as needed and will also be able
to create new categories based on their city/county requirements.
Sanitary system standard observations/defects Page 2
Structural Observations
The structural defects are detected as irregularities of the pipe. The structural problems will
be corrected by repairing or by replacing the existing pipeline. e.g. broken pipe, collapsed
pipe, sag in the pipe, lining failure of sewer line, etc.
O&M (Operation and Maintenance)
Operation and Maintenance defects will be resolved by cleaning or maintaining the pipe
Structural fix of the pipe is not required. "Operation and maintenance" (O&M) includes all
aspects of running a building over the course of its useful life. Because of the far-reaching
nature of O&M, a well -designed and properly executed program is critical to the overall
success of a "sustainable -designed" facility. e.g. grease, debris, roots, vermin, lateral
abandoned - unsealed, etc.
Inventory
The inventory is a list containing the content of a buried infrastructure. This will include the
state and condition of a property including the pipe, the state of a property and also the
structural fixtures and fittings. This is the information that the utility will be able to see, if
necessary. e.g. clean out, lateral in the pipe, water mark in the pipe, dead end etc.
Miscellaneous
These are the observations that do not fall under either Structural, O&M or Inventory
categories. Cities may or may not be able to see these observations if they send another
crew to do an inspection again. e.g. camera under water, start downstream inspection,
abandoned survey etc.
Sanitary system standard observations/defects Page 3
OBSERVATION DEFECT DETAILS
MODIFIER
GROUP
CODE
PICTURE
/ SEVERITY
O&M (OPERATION & MAINTENAN
OBSERVATIONS
O&M - 1
Deposits
Light''
1, I.-... t'a
•
r •
•1
C ��S _t•} YI
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960054 — 31960053 0f 12/1/2006 10:35: 02
AM
Medium
�I iyq�5
• • � T,. fSt HH iAP i �i$LFY� r
r
�L • y.�'F t• 1 i tI 1'f
_ n.:,
. - ' i'.
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960057 — 31960052 0f 11/30/2006 10:36: 32
AM
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 4
Severe
Courtesy.
31960049
am 'y'
;
,irr i �.,t.. 1.�
Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
— 31960047 0f 12/01/2006 11:48: 53
AM
O&M - 2
Grease
Light
;Courtesy.
31960054
L2fOL- 10:54
• HH 5FART3- 319'60054
• . MH &DPP; •,3 '60053
T
•
F,z
.
Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
— 31960053 0f 12/1/2006 10:35: 02
AM
Medium
Severe
-22a. I F't } .
i 4. ,.
„7.011 Mil
'
+_
* `:454 i
- 4 i- -
.a
Courtesy. Doc Bennett, Vice -President,
International Sales, CUES Inc.
OR
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 5
1 - % S •• ,1S
•
r i
Ref
http://griffinfog.com/Images/grease%20found%
20in%20. i. ing.JPG
O&M - 3
Infiltration
Light
, j+`
"silk
, ti.
+ ,I
d11
1, !
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960059 31960058 0f 12/1/2006 8:46:36 AM
Medium
1 'i'.. 94.+y
s . '
ti1+H .E7oRTf19�::,
tHi4P:19 9
r r,
.t
,
r • .:•
! .P;tts� '42
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960059 — 31960058 0f 11/30/2006 8:46:36
AM
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 6
Severe
.. 'r1
• . . :. .
600ad
' •+ -. ; ;saes
—70
•
, If ' +� ,1
//A'
. • . +{7
• ! +
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960054 — 31960053 0f 12/1/2006 10:35: 02
AM
O&M - 4
Root
Light - Light Root
Problem
9V29'2146 12192 Ph
Prot* Ha?ei taoYoul Min `
iiiraaianodiiov�•n ��
ounstrear nqld• '
t(1l ., condiltol
sry hel phi: P
g shar i P_■
Cosptnts
.'
Courtesy. Hamilton, TN; Project Name: Lookout
Mtn; Pi.e.: Sewer Main 9-29-06-E.B. -Dro.
Medium - Medium
Root Problem
{ Yr
rr)r .,
'Pi
m �yi icy,
�'�y, i y It .
* J
r:t t� ,,1'• -
,3 . t Pi -..
Courtesy. CUES Sample DB Video
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 7
Heavy - Heavy Root
Problem
.I .1
.i
` i ,S
y{
'� 4 -
. \ ' ;•. . 4 _
1+u
{ 1 4 i. n
Courtesy. CUES Sample DB Video
O&M - 5
Debris
<=10%
A'
IP--..r -
,1+.•
Courtesy. Hamilton, TN; Project Name:
Savannah Bay Offsite; Pipe: Sewer Main 10-31-
06-SB0-04 (04-03)
<=20%
<=30%
>30%
•
F .•-
NN >;FON' or -or-
Courtesy. Hamilton, TN Project Name:
Kingwood; Pipe: Sewer Main 1552 (MH 1034-
1031)
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 8
O&M - 6
Lateral
Abandoned - Unsealed
+ r87 85
i 2.
Courtesy. Cross Bore Test on Lexington, TN;
Project Name: Kentucky Avenue; Pipe: Sewer
Main TB3_733_TB3_732 of 1/25/2007 6.:06:53
PM
O&M - 7
Vermin
Cockroach
Rat
Or P
i.y- ' t.;
Courtesy.
http://edp.org/Germany/Paris/SewerRatjpg
Mice
Snake
‘I'"` iiIP
s 4
' -
cif :i_I.
87 Rattlesnakes
Courtesy. Doc Bennett, Vice -President,
International Sales, CUES Inc.
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 9
Other
MirirlQ C: FROM 1$ 5, S¢:Hj{24
. y�e�4 f L1 : tjr:
,'� >r
,r IE.
c.
• • • 4 • • F ,
Courtesy. Gator Video from CUES
STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION DEFECTS
Structural - 1
Bricks
Missing
Light
•
-
a., -
E14,0 Fri
-MH Siwti C-LS_0@8-@5T6 r
MH ST0 = - 9 065-@n7B
Courtesy. Noblesville, IN
Medium
f -# �,--ice
•
}
Is 44`
Courtesy. Doc Bennett. Vice President,
International Sales, CUES
Severe
Structural - 2
Cavity
Small
Medium
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 10
Large
Courtesy.
•
= a - -_
1
Hamilton, TN; Project Name: Lookout
Mtn; Pipe: Sewer Main 9-29-06-SO-1 (MH
Dead End-1)
Structural - 3
Collapsed
Small
Medium
Large
'.
#{ r + ' }
1 '1;! i :1 '..-
•rt
Courtesy. From Doc Bennett. Vice President,
International Sales, CUES
Structural - 4
Crack
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 11
Circular - Narrow
: u,yr'; •.:s;•
•
,
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
3196064 — 31960065 0f 11/30/2006 2: 04: 40 PM
Longitudinal -
Narrow
.e/61166 0:38
CC,.1 Fr.
.`PT: 7196G054
6H STC3P: 31964053
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960054 — 31960053 0f 12/1/2006 10:35: 02
AM
7r4NW.
r '
.Vr.
, . ,7 tr.* — ' .?.. ..
S2.9. FI.
Courtesy. CUES Town Sample DB Video.
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 12
Multiple - Narrow
.. LL,.'��1
f r
il
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960057 — 31960052 of 11/30/2006 10:36:32
AM
Spiral - Narrow
Circular - Wider
Longitudinal - Wider
•Y $.
f: ; ~r '� ' ! -
4
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960045 — 31960044 of 12/05/2006 7.•45: 33
AM
Multiple - Wider
,
P 5 q`
•
';
Courtesy. Hamilton, TN; Project Name: Lookout
Mtn Pipe: 9-29-06-E.B of 9/29/2006 11:55: 05
AM
Spiral - Wider
Structural - 5
Surface
Damage
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 13
Light Material
Damage - Chemical
Problem
L
OF
12r15106••13:39
_, s 9 .'0FT .
l;' 1960036
jfTata .� 1960.035
,•;
l' ,
!ir_
Light Material
Damage -
Mechanical Problem
Medium Material
Damage - Chemical
Problem
-'
-
r ,...
, • • , - `
i = I'. mar-i•
-
n1 4IGI/O13:'2 • .
Courtesy. CUES Sample DB Video.
• • ,
y.
i
Medium Material
Damage -
Mechanical Problem
Severe Material
Damage - Chemical
Problem
Severe Material
Damage -
Mechanical Problem
Structural - 6
Flattened
—
Light
Medium
Severe
Structural - 7
Joint -
Gasket
Light
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 14
Medium
-
ggligpgppRRpS.+Fi
H S
Courtesy. Hamilton, TN; Project Name: Lookout
Mtn; Pipe: Sewer Main 9-29-06-S0-2 (MH 1-2)
Structural - 8
Joint -
Infiltration
Severe
,. I ', ..i.
A:
r-f �' ,bcR� lh,l '
i
F 14 I I 1i
1 r iil
'P.O. � ; . I + ;
i,1114, iit'' + 'A 1Y , 1
n • Ai
Light
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960059 — 31960058 0 12/1/2006 8: 46: 36 AM
Medium
P • " y._,,+'.
, 66
I![` iii I i; 31 ;.9- 14 .
1
5 $�
• r 4
rh C. ; fk, ,
-io,i.
; ':'.'
, . ;
h5 '
•
P' r +
'•,'�++•
I r , i+,
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960059 — 31960058 0f ll/30/2006 8:46: 36
AM
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 15
Severe
ki . 1 '
Courtesy. Orange County, FL,• Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960054 — 31960053 0f 12/1/2006 10:35: 02
AM
Structural - 9
Joint -
Separated
Small
Medium
n
.,
.L4
1.
Courtesy. Hamilton, TN; Project Name: Lookout
Mtn; Pipe: Sewer Main 9-29-06-E.B. (-Drop)
Large
Structural -
10
Joint Offset
Small
w—'12/o4r06 12:05
7A.2 FT.
NH STAVE S1960'347
NH STOP; 31940945
fie'
.
=
I.
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960047 — 31960045 0f 12/4/2006 11:58: 01
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 16
AM
Medium
r
^,ftH Or :
Y
L. ,
i
A
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960049 — 31960047 0f 12/1/2006 11:48: 53
AM
Large
Structural -
11
Sag
Light
12r65f06 pT:49
i9. FT.
MH START' 31969445
IiH STOPr 31969014
•
I
'1
I
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960045 — 31960044 0f 12/5/2006 7:45: 33 AM
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 17
Medium
worts 6?:54
HA STARtA 31966445
H1I S.T.'1 , 1966E4d
tir r
{,. . t
•
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960045 — 31960044 0f 12/5/2006 7: 45: 33 AM
Severe
E: ._
:7� i Fi.
:! Sr. T: :4r.;,:,;a
11X ST,;P: LYttiU:1
it/` ti i
(
--
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960063 — 31960062 0 12/1/2006 9: 28: 29 AM
Structural -
12
Broken
Soil Visible - Small
r
- , :i, 11 tkp,, ,
-fj ?'1 �.
` 4i,
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960049— 31960047 0f 12/1/2006 11:48: 53
AM
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 18
Soil Visible - Medium
25
11H f sJ
MH Pr i 33
11
Courtesy. Clark County, NV
x
. i
4
Courtesy. Hamilton, TN; Project Name:
Kingwood; Pipe: Sewer Main 1552 (MH 1034-
1031
,
� � 1
r
Soil Visible - Large
Courtesy. Hamilton, TN; Project Name:
Kingwood; Pipe: Sewer Main 1552 (MH 1034-
1031)
Void Visible — Small
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 19
Void Visible -
Medium
U,; FAT.24 2:
31960''�
STRPP 31960
MP
w rt
-•;
•
..•
- { r� -
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960049 — 31960047 0f 12/01/2006 11:48: 53
AM
Void Visible - Large
i• :c: s,k
'ram! • • I I
1111 :. I x F 1
Courtesy. Cross Bore Test on Lexington, TN;
Project Name: Kentucky Avenue; Pipe: Sewer
Main TB3_733_TB3_732 of 1/25/2007 6.:06.•53
PM
Hole
-. -. 07
. y
'r
3T.
•
} •,
MN r.rHD1
Courtesy. Cross Bore Test on Lexington, TN;
Project Name: Kentucky Avenue; Pipe: Sewer
Main TB3_733_TB3_732 of 1/25/2007 6:06:53
PM
Structural -
13
Deformed
<=10%
>10%
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 20
Structural -
14
Joint -
Angular
Small
Medium
Large
Structural -
15
Intruding
Sealing
Grout
Hanging
■
Gasket
<=10%
Hanging Gasket
<=20%
Hanging Gasket
<=30%
Hanging Gasket
>30%
Structural -
16
Intruding
Sealing Ring
Hanging Gasket
<=10%
Hanging Gasket
<=20%
Hanging Gasket
<=30%
Hanging Gasket
>30%
Structural -
17
Lining
Failure
Abandon connection
Blistered lining
Buckled
Connection cut
shifted
Detached
Defective end
Overcut connection
Undercut connection
Other
Lateral
Connection
Problem
Structural -
18
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 21
Connection Pipe
Damaged
295.1 FT.
+ { HH STAPT. 3k 7e:093E
HH STOP1 31961)9t:
•
4
.:
Courtesy. Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960038 — 31960037 0f 12/5/2006 9: 44: 25 AM
Connection•
Protruding
Courtesy.
Project
Main
TN;
. - FI
'' • •
.r }� �' ` •';% ;+
e: ti . -V,
��
C4-+V N N
9 F_17 9
Cross Bore Test on Lexington,
Name: Kentucky Avenue; Pipe: Sewer
TB3_733_TB3_732 of 1/25/2007 6.:06.'53
PM
Lateral Blocked
Factory Defective
Pi.e
Structural —
19
Cross Bore
— Gas Line
..� — _ iL �� ti `
r
- r / F �,
i , kf- i• ,�
?+� ,�'.• ,� ,.1,
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 22
T.
l' • it s'o. ._ .... . rcushi F],@
i t
r .• t
Courtesy. Courtesy Hamilton, TN
INVENTORY OBSERVATIONS
Inventory - 1
Catch Basin
Quit Fi4tn •• "I '..' Al
1{ i101,1' i;nt}
Y.11
r
#Pioatabies
al
w AA ,
r
{
I
• r - ' • •• i rF • r
•
- - - —rmmM _�
JIM
Ref: ktp://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/gif/floatcb.gif
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 23
Inventory - 2
Cleanout
pamineu1
2"
Hoar
INNEWOMPEnt
Min
WIE11114111mm,
Building s4wor
Ref:
http://www.sweethaven02.com/BldgConst/en511
2a0075.gif
Inventory - 3
Discharge
point
-.3.
a - .'tiF -. - - d
a
rAI •.}ram"-
Ref.
http://gis2.esri.com/library/userconf/proc02/pap
0830/discharge pntjpg
Inventory - 4
End of Pipe
Inventory - 5
Junction Box
Inventory - 6
Meter
Inventory - 7
Tee
Connection
Inventory - 8
Wet Well
Inventory - 9
Lateral
Live Connection
ot
'rim
Nij • IN��1FT ■
Courtesy: Hamilton, TN; Project Name: E.R.
Dabney RD; Pipe 2626
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 24
Capped
.,
S
4
•
-Yr
Courtesy: Hamilton, TN; Project Name:
Kingwood; Pipe: Sewer Main 1552 (MH 1034-
1031)
Inventory - 10
Pipe Size
V
TOPS
r
E r #
' '.'
,.
Courtesy: Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960057 — 31960052 0f 11/30/2006 10:36: 32
AM (from 6 inches to 4 inches)
Inventory - 11
Pipe Type
•
trOL 7 l M -. { Si, . S FS I 3 y !. ?,S�.3
f.
, .. ow
Courtesy: Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
31960064 — 31960065 0f 11/30/2006 02:04:40
PM
Inventory - 12
Dead End
Inventory - 13
Pipe Continue
Inventory - 14
Water Mark
>=50%
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 25
>=75%
Inventory - 15
Dye Test
Not Visible
Visible
Inventory - 16
Grouted
MISCELLANEOUS OBSERVATIONS
Miscellaneous
- 1
CONT. WITH
FLOW
Miscellaneous
2
CONT.
AGAINST
FLOW
Miscellaneous
- 3
START WITH
FLOW
Miscellaneous
- 4
START LAT
INSPECTION
Miscellaneous
5
START
AGAINST
FLOW
Miscellaneous
-6
STOP
Miscellaneou
s-7
Water Level
<25%
31960057
- -
3„Ji -
r ai—
Courtesy: Orange County, FL; Project Name:
3196-Corrine Terrace; Pipe: Sewer Main
— 31960052 0f 11 /30/200610. 36. 32
AM (from 6 inches to 4 inches)
Sanitary system standard observations/defects
Page 26
>=25%
,r . '
{ • A
.t- - ..
41
Courtesy: Hamilton, TN; Project Name:
Kingwood; Pipe: Sewer Main 1552 (MH 1034-
1031)
>=50%
>=75%
100%
Miscellaneous
- 8
Camera
Under Water
rt
:a Phi ill
Courtesy: Hamilton, TN; Project Name: E.R.
Dabney RD; Pipe 2626
Miscellaneous
- 9
Abandoned
Survey
Sanitary system standard observations/defects Page 27