Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Packet - 4/1/2024CITY OF %�64TERLOO IOWA THE CITY COUNCIL OF WATERLOO, IOWA WORK SESSION TO BE HELD AT Harold E. Getty Council Chambers Monday, April 1, 2024 4:50 PM RULES FOR WORK SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT Iowa Code Chapter 21 gives the public the right to attend council meetings, but it does not require cities to allow public participation except during public hearings.The city council shall not receive any public comment during a work session. Roll Call Agenda, as proposed or amended Approval of Minutes of the March 18, 2024, Council Work Session as proposed or amended. 4:50 p.m. Discussion of the FY2025 Budget. Submitted by: Bridgett Wood, Finance Director ADJOURNMENT Kelley Felchle City Clerk Page 1 of 18 March 18, 2024 COUNCIL WORK SESSION Harold E. Getty Council Chambers 3:50 p.m. Roll Call. Members present: Mayor Quentin Hart in the Chair. Mr. Boesen, Mr. Chiles, Mr. Simon, Ms. Wilder and Mr. Feuss. Mr. Nichols entered the meeting at 4:15 p.m., and Ms. Creighton -Smith entered the meeting at 4:23. Approval of Agenda, as proposed or amended. Feuss/Simon that the agenda, as proposed, be approved. Voice vote -Ayes: Five. Motion carried. Approval of Minutes of March 4, 2024, as proposed or amended. that the minutes of March 4, 2024, as proposed, be approved. Voice vote -Ayes: Five. Motion carried. Discussion of a one-way street in front of Irving School. Mohammad Elahi, Traffic Operations Director, provided information regarding traffic concerns of Irving School staff during drop-off and pick-up of children, suggesting that Western and Johnson Streets be designated as one-way streets. A study was performed and consultants recommended the street be designated as one-way to six corners. Ms. Wilder shared as a representative of the Safety Committee for the Church Row Neighborhood she appreciated the efforts to make the community safer and recommended the council members approve the recommendation to help the Irving School community. Mayor Hart questioned if a round -about was considered in the study. Mr. Chiles questioned if any other measures were considered to avoid confusion changing to one-way traffic. Mohammad Elahi assured the council signs would be posted noting one-way traffic and reviewed the parameters and history included in the study. Mr. Boesen requested clarification one-way traffic starting on Baltimore, traveling east and continue onto Western Avenue traveling south. Mohammad Elahi explained the one-way would start on Pleasant, just past the church driveway, traveling north on Western Avenue and then West on Johnson Street. Mr. Boesen expressed concern it would confuse drivers starting a one-way in the middle of a block as opposed to an intersection. Page 1of4 Page 2 of 18 Mohammad Elahi explained his intention was to avoid disrupting the church traffic and this could be accomplished with center lane markings and signage, but indicated he could speak with the churches regarding the project. Mr. Nichols questioned what communication will look like with families to make them aware of the changes. Mr. Simon questioned if this included widening the street. Mohammad Elahi responded the project was only for changing the streets to one-way traffic. Mr. Feuss questioned if the project could be done after school is let out for the summer and so drivers are used to the change by fall when school starts back up again and the impact or changelles if 5th Street is turned into a two-way street and Johnston is turned into a one-way. Mohammad Elahi responded the changes will not have a negative impact that they will help the situation. Zach Zimmerman, Principal at Irving Elementary, shared that if there is a change they would like it to happen in the summer. Mr. Boesen questioned if the study looked at the impact this would have on Pleasant Street. Mohammad Elahi responded the study included both intersections and feel the existing volume would not be adversely effected by the change. Ms. Creighton -Smith agreed she would like to see the one-way start at the intersection rather than the middle of the block. U odate from the Sanitation Department on technology and operations. Scott Brunson, Sanitation Director, provided an update on various aspects of Sanitation Department operations. Mr. Boesen questioned how much is being lost per month in recycling. Scott Brunson explained they will lose with $5,000-$6,0000 per month, dipping into reserves. Mr. Boesen asked if the City eliminates use of the calendars how do they reach people who do not have internet or smart phones? Scott Brunson explained, in those instances a calendar can be requested and mailed to a citizen. Mr. Boesen questioned when the city will be charging for overfilling cans. Scott Brunson explained the city currently doesn't charged for overfilling a can but for the return visit from sanitation to pick up excess refuse. Mr. Boesen questioned moving to a system for dumpsters being located in a secured enclosed Page 2 of 4 Page 3 of 18 area. Scott Brunson responded they have had that conversation, but that a decision has not been made yet. It is his opinion that the best solution would be to have locking mechanisms on the lids to control loose trash. Mr. Chiles commented that he likes the idea of an app and questioned if other city departments could use the same app or if other departments could use the same app. Chris Youngblut, IT Director, shared that ReCollect is specific to Sanitation operations and looking at other cities that have this software have a second, city specific app. Ms. Wilder questioned where the funds for the app would originate. Scott Brunson responded this has been budgeted for in this fiscal year already. Mr. Simon questioned overlap between the mailings and app use. Scott Brunson stated he would research the crossover futher. Mayor Hart explained citizens would have the choice of using the app vs. receiving a paper copy of the calendar and the savings associated with using the app. Mr. Simon questioned obtaining the customer data base to contact customers. Scott Brunson explained they use routeware to gather that information and coordinate informing costumers regarding the app. Discussion of an ordinance regarding rental application fees. Ms. Creighton -Smith provided an overview of the proposed ordinance and shared that the ordinance proposes to limit rental application fees charged by property owners for applications to what it would cost to run a credit check and a background check. Martin Petersen, City Attorney, explained that he spoke with an attorney in Iowa City who successfully argued a case at the Iowa Supreme Court that defended tenants regarding application fees. Mr. Boesen questioned how fees will be monitored. Ms. Creighton -Smith commented the city can determine an average of what background checks cost and use that amount to establish the ordinance limiting application fees as the fees cannot be banned totally. Ms. Wilder considers this a great step in protecting renters. Mr. Simon feels the fee should be equitable but have an avenue for adjusting the amount as the avererage increase for background and credit checks. Mr. Feuss questioned if the information could be added to the city website and investigating the Page 3of4 Page 4 of 18 entire application process and cost for both landlord and tenant. Kelley Felchle, City Clerk, explained all information could be added to the City Website to add transparency to the process and explained the new rental registration software allows for tenants to access landlord information online to determine if property has been inspected and if landlords are licensed and registered. She explained the payment of fees in the ordinance change would make the payment of fees for inspection a condition of maintaining a rental permit as opposed to a condition of receiving a rental permit. Mayor Hart questioned if a person submits a rental application and the background or credit check is denied does the applicant have a right to know the reason for the denial. Martin Petersen responded he is not aware of a requirement to inform and applicant of the reason for denial. Mayor Hart questioned if the applicant had a right to a copy of the report if the application is denied. LeKeisha Veasley, Director of Housing Authority, explained if an applicant signs a disclosure document they may receive a copy of the report. Mr. Nichols questioned if a renter could have one credit or background check run and that report used across the board for applications rather than paying for multiple applications. Mr. Simon questioned the accuracy and longevity of using and running one report as credit and background reports can change daily. He also questioned if a landlord overcharged for an application if that could be rebated to the renter upon first payment. Mayor Hart commented there is a consensus to do something with rental applications but that there needs to be more discussion. Kelley Felchle questioned if section 2 of the proposed ordinance could be moved forward to the April 1, 2024 meeting as a stand alone ordinance. Mayor Hart asked that the council schedule to complete additional discussion within a month to move forward with the remaining ordinance changes. ADJOURNMENT Simon/Wilder that the council adjourn at 4:55 p.m. Voice vote -Ayes: Seven. Motion carried. Kelley Felchle City Clerk Page 4 of 4 Page 5 of 18 3/29/2024 - • Ap FY2025 PUBLISHED BUDGET REVIEW "`"' CITY OF WATERLOO, IOWA April 1, 2024 CITY OF •.*110 IOWA Community of Opportunity • 1, • • * 1 Outline 1.FY2025 Published Levy Rates 2.FY2025 Proposed Certified Budget 2 2 1 Page 6 of 18 3/29/2024 FY2025 Published Levy Rates 8 3 Program FY2025 Published Levy Rates Percentage of Tax Levy Portion Levy Police and Fire $ 13.41669 60% Debt Service $ 3.20294 14% All Other Services $ 5.79648 26% Total City Levies $ 22.41611 100% Total $ 22.41611 4 4 2 Page 7 of 18 3/29/2024 FY2025 Published Levy Rates Building Inspections $ (0.06795) Public Works $ 0.909583 Health & Social Services $ 0.156344 $ 3.64364 Community & Economic Development $ 0.335678 General Government $ 0.81919 Culture & Recreation Total Other $ 5.79648 5 5 FY2025 Published Levy Rates Non-Ag Change Ag Change 13.85% (5.75%) Tax Rate Comparison - Current VS. Proposed Residential property with an Current Year actual/assessed value of $100,000 Certified 2023/2024 Commercial property with an actual/assessed value of $100,000 City Regular $1,078 Resident Budget Year Certified 2023/2024 $1,039 Percent Change -3.62% Current Year Budget Year Percent Certified 2023/2024 Certified Change 2023/2024 City Regular Commercia $1,078 $1,039 -3.62% 6 6 3 Page 8 of 18 3/29/2024 Where does my property tax dollar go? I'IIE l-Mil':l} S'1',i PAHATII 3 C81230251CI 3 ram. 'o* AL. City of Waterloo 49 cents I'.I•: ill•'_11ll:l:I['.� Waterloo Schools Black Hawk Co. Other 32 cents For the Year Ending 6-30-24 16 cents 3 cents 7 7 FY2025 Proposed Certified Budget 22 8 4 Page 9 of 18 3/29/2024 FY2025 Proposed Certified Budget Published Tax Estimated Change from Levy Portion Certified Tax Published Program Levy Portion Police and Fire Debt Service All Other Services Total City Levies $13.41669 $ $3.20294 $ $5.79648 $ 13.31370 $ 3.09910 $ 5.67637 $ (0.10299) (0.10384) (0.12011) $22.41611 $ 22.08917 $ (0.32694) 23 9 FY2025 Proposed Certified Budget Program -Breakout of Other Building Inspections Public Works Health & Social Services Culture & Recreation Community & Economic Development General Government Use of Fund Balance Published Tax Levy Portion ($0.06795) $0.90958 $0.15634 $3.64364 $0.33568 $0.81919 Estimated Change from Certified Tax Published Levy Portion $ (0.06743) $ 0.00052 $ 0.82698 $ (0.08261) $ 0.15514 $ (0.00120) $ 3.61567 $ (0.02797) 0.33310 $ (0.00258) 0.81291 $ (0.00628) $ - Total Other $5.79648 $ 5.67637 $ (0.12012) 24 10 5 Page 10 of 18 3/29/2024 How is the tax bill on my home determined? FY2025 Estimated Certified Assessed Value $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Times Rollback 0.463428 0.463428 0.546501 Equals Taxable Value $ 46,343 $ 46,343 $ 54,650 Divide by $1,000 46.3428 46.3428 54.6501 Times Total Tax Levy Rate $42.87322 $42.54628 $40.18730 Equals Total Tax Bill $1,986.87 $ 1,971.71 $2,196.24 City Portion of Tax Bill $1,038.83 $ 1,023.67 $1,078.26 Projected Annual Incr (Decr) $ (39.43) $ (54.58) $ 51.32 Percentage Incr (Decr) -3.80% -5.33% 4.76% FY2025 Published FY2024 Certified 11 11 FY2025 Proposed Certified Budget Non-Ag Change Ag Change Tax Rate Comparison - Current VS. Proposed Residential property with an actual/assessed value of 5100.000 Commercial property with an actual/assessed value of $100.000 City Regular Resident) City Regular Commerciall Current Year Budget Year Certified 202312024 Certified 2023/2024 31.078 51.024 Current Year Budget Year Certified 2023/2024 Certified 2023/2024 51.078 51.024 Percent Change -5.41010 Percent Change 5.01 % 12 12 6 Page 11 of 18 3/29/2024 FY2025 General Fund Budget Impacts at Proposed Certified Budget Personnel Increases (Primarily Contractual) Pay Increases, including payroll taxes, overtime, and other payouts. Increase in Fire Dept Overtime (military) Health Insurance Increase Police & Fire Pension Increase Total Personnel Increases $2,162,116 $75,000 $626,677 $250,770 $3,114,563 13 13 FY2025 General Fund Impacts At Proposed Certified Budget Other Significant Non -Personnel Changes Increase in Grant Funded Expenses Increase in Liability Insurance Increase in work comp expenses Increase in sidewalk expenses Increase in airport expenses Other expense changes -net Total Net Non -Personnel Expense Changes $822,830 $253,692 $190,000 $175,000 $137,097 $411,951 $1,990,570 14 14 7 Page 12 of 18 3/29/2024 FY2025 General Fund Budget Impacts at Proposed Levy Rates Significant Revenue Changes Increase in Ambulance Transport Revenue $453,863 Increase in Police ATE Revenue $100,000 Increase in Airport Revenue $184,500 Increase in Clerk/Finance Revenue $228,450 Increase in Sidewalk Assessments $175,000 Other increases, fees, grants - net $761,791 Total Net Revenue Increase $1,903,604 15 15 FY2025 General Fund Budget Impacts at Proposed Levy Rates Net Change in General Fund Property Taxes Net increase in personnel expenses Net increase in other expenses Net increase in revenue Net decrease in use of fund balance Total Net Increase in Property Taxes $3,114,563 $1,990,570 ($1,903,604) $1,650,000 $4,851,529 16 16 8 Page 13 of 18 3/29/2024 FY2025 General Fund Budget Impacts at Proposed Levy Rates Net Change in Property Taxes Increase in General Fund property taxes Increase in Debt Service Fund property taxes Overall Net Increase in Total Property Taxes $4,851,529 $1,530,492 $6,382,021 17 17 How are Capital Project Funds used? $2,508,333 4% $12,075,000 13% $2,018,333 \ $100,000 2% 0% ,_$4,538,000 5% $30,000,000/ 33% $10,000,000 11% $26,000,000 28% For the Year Ending 6-30-2025 Funded by TIF, Bonds, FAA Funds, Grants • Streets & Trailways • Traffic Improvements Bridges • TIF ▪ GO Issue Fiber Backbone Parks Airport 18 18 9 Page 14 of 18 3/29/2024 Sewer Fund Budget Debt Service for Sewer System Improvements $5,031,822 16% System Improvements $14,700,000 47% For the Year Ending 6-30-2025 Funded by Sewer Fees and SRF Loans Plant & System Maintenance Operations $11,727,175 37% 32 19 Storm Water Fund Budget System Improvements $4,500,000 72% For the Year Ending 6-30-2025 Funded by User Fees Street Sweeping $423,220 7% System Operations & Maintenance $1,333,641 21% 20 20 Page 15 of 1810 3/29/2024 Sanitation Fund Budget Garbage & Yard Waste Disposal, Recycling & Neighborhood Clean-ups $5,372,358 73% Equipment $800,000 11% For the Year Ending 6-30-2025 Funded by User Fees Animal Control $440,027 6% Code Enforcement $702,346 10% 21 21 Snow Removal $1,908,692 16% Road Use Tax Fund Budget Forestry Right -of Way Operations $1,181,844 10% Street Maintenance $2,604,498 22% N Engineering $1,558,496 13% Traffic Signals Street Lights $105,000 For the Year Ending6-30-2025 $500,000 1% 4 /o Funded by State Fuel Tax Streets & Bridge Repair $2,063,890 17% Traffic Operations $2,000,887 17% 22 22 Page 16 of 1811 3/29/2024 Local Option Fund Budget $1,264,532 7% Unimproved Street Repair $859,728 4% Engineering For the Year Ending 6-30-2025 Funded by Local Option Taxes $17,550,000 89% Street Repair & Construction 36 23 Federal Block Grant Funds Budget Administration & Other $1,305,792 15% Neighborhood Services $104,971 1% Housing Rehab & Construction $7,279,096 84% For the Year Ending 6-30-2025 Funded by Federal Block Grant Funds 37 24 Page 17 of 1812 3/29/2024 Federal Housing Funds Budget Down Payment & Other Assistance $70,000 1% $398,180 5% Ridgeway Towers Senior Public Housing Administration & Other _$1,079,643 14% For the Year Ending 6-30-2025 Funded by Federal Housing Funds Housing Assistance $6,120, 000 80% 38 25 11111\Illllllllllilll �,--�- 0 7tI1 Questions? Please contact City Hall to speak with Mayor Hart or Bridgett Wood with more questions. A special thank you to Mayor Hart, the City Council, the Finance Department Staff, and all City departments for their work to develop the budget and for the service they provide to our citizens year round. 40 26 Page 18 of 1813